• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What kind of a god would make a place like Hell/Hellfire?

Glaurung

Denizen of Niflheim
I never said I objected to my existence. That isn't the
point. I'm addressing the inaccurate claim that God
doesn't impose Himself on us. He decides who will
exist—and, by extension, where they'll end up given that
He foreknows this.
It is the point. You don't scream at your parents for not aborting you every time life doesn't go your way, because existence is a gift. It's a factious objection to use God's foreknowledge as a means to deny your responsibility for your own fate. I don't find it compelling, because I reject the premise. (That God has any responsibility for our choices)

It's interesting how people will include certainty of hell in
the "mystery" but any other, less dire, scenario is set
aside because hey, it's all a mystery
That's not what I said.

It's no mystery as to why Hell exists. What is a mystery is why God does not do more to ensure the salvation of more people. And I admit this is a valid question. But it is partly answered in acknowledging that we aren't owed anything by God. But we owe God, and we owe Him obedience.

God knows better, and He is no way obligated to give us more grace that what He fells sufficient. And it's our fault, and our fault alone if we fail to cooperate with that grace. You either understand and accept that, or you refuse to. It's up to you.

Ironically, the very insistence that our wills be free
negates the spirit of "Thy will be done".
The point of our free will isn't for us to do what we like. You don't actually have the right to sin or reject God. (Which is why we will all answer for our lives at the end of them). You have free will so to obey the moral law. Automatons don't really obey laws, they obey a program. But God didn't write a program, He created a world. And that includes morally accountable beings.
 
It is the point. You don't scream at your parents for not aborting you every time life doesn't go your way, because existence is a gift. It's a factious objection to use God's foreknowledge as a means to deny your responsibility for your own fate. I don't find it compelling, because I reject the premise. (That God has any responsibility for our choices)
No, it is not the point. You're making this about
throwing a fit over existence when that's not my point at
all. I'm simply drawing a direct line between God's
actions and the results.

You are free to reject the premise (in fact, as a Catholic you
are probably morally obligated to), but that won't make it
go away.

That's not what I said.
It was implied, or else I wouldn't have made the
observation. :)

It's no mystery as to why Hell exists.
It may not even be a fact that it exists, either, let alone why.

What is a mystery is why God does not do more to ensure the salvation of more people.
Who says He doesn't? This is just one belief out of how
many out there.

What's a mystery to me is why so many insist on settling
for that scenario in their belief systems.

And I admit this is a valid question. But it is partly answered in acknowledging that we aren't owed anything by God. But we owe God, and we owe Him obedience.
Depends on the religion, and even then no one can agree
as to what constitutes "obedience", even within the same
religion.

God knows better, and He is no way obligated to give us more grace that what He fells sufficient. And it's our fault, and our fault alone if we fail to cooperate with that grace. You either understand and accept that, or you refuse to. It's up to you.
That's your belief, and that's all it is: a belief.

The product is not to be blamed for the flaws the
manufacturer placed within it. The manufacturer alone is
responsible for that. If a mere human manufacturer can
be expected to live up to this standard, I'm sure God can.

The point of our free will isn't for us to do what we like. You don't actually have the right to sin or reject God. (Which is why we will all answer for our lives at the end of them). You have free will so to obey the moral law. Automatons don't really obey laws, they obey a program. But God didn't write a program, He created a world. And that includes morally accountable beings.
The robot analogy falls flat when one considers that the
Christian scriptures refer to people as "clay"—far inferior
to robots—and God the Potter.


-
 

Glaurung

Denizen of Niflheim
It may not even be a fact that it exists, either, let alone why.
Do you understand how discussion woks? If you're questioning the Christian belief in Hell, then that question assumes for the sake of discussion that Hell exists. Turing around saying prove it was never the question.

The robot analogy falls flat when one considers that the
Christian scriptures refer to people as "clay"—far inferior
to robots—and God the Potter.
Being clay shaped by God is actually a far superior state than to be a robot. That clay, is in God's image. The image of truth and goodness itself. And why we are only happy in God.

But Saint Paul is correct. As glorious as that clay is, we're still clay infinitely inferior to God. The fact that God ought to care for us at all is infinitely more than to what we're entitled.

It's a high view of humanity actually. That we're the beloved children of the one and only God. Of course, if you'd rather believe that we're mere animals here to breed and die you're free to it. But it's not me then with the low view of humanity.
 
Last edited:

gnostic

The Lost One
The point of our free will isn't for us to do what we like. You don't actually have the right to sin or reject God. (Which is why we will all answer for our lives at the end of them). You have free will so to obey the moral law.
Then, there is no free will here, which would render free will as pointless, if we exercise the free will of not believing or worshipping this God.

I can only believe what I actually see, what I can actually feel and what I

Seriously, how does that make God any better than the Devil?

It actually make God an oppressive tyrant than the devil...well, that if either one of them "exist".

Telling people how they should think, how to feel, or what to believe, and then punishing them for not toeing the line, is not free-will, but oppression.

Well, didn't Church oppress a lot of people with tortures and executions for alleged heresy and witchcraft? The church made a name for themselves for oppression and crushing people's will. I'd bet that Jesus is cheering you on. o_O*sarcasm*
 
Last edited:

Glaurung

Denizen of Niflheim
Then, there is no free will here, which would render free will as pointless, if we exercise the free will of not believing or worshipping this God.
It's not pointless. We are not given this life to do as we please. We are given this life is to determine our answer to God's offer of salvation. We must want salvation of our own accord. Just because we have the freedom to sin, doesn't mean we have the right to. Because we're not here to have a fun, pleasurable time. We're not here to sleep around and determine what we want to be true. We're here to answer a question.

"Do you want to spend eternity with Me, or do you want to go your own way?"

Seriously, how does that make God any better than the Devil?
God is the source of all goodness. He is the truth and no happiness exists outside of Him. (Nothing can even exist but for God's will) He wants you to be happy, but will not force you to actually accept that happiness. The Devil is a miserable liar who because of his own pride fell from the happiness he was created to enjoy. In petty revenge he now seeks nothing more than to drag as many human souls down with him into his pit to join him in eternal misery. God loves us, the Devil despises us. God has our best interests in mind, the Devil wants to hurt us. The Devil is also a mere created being, as dependant on God as we all are. In short. God is infinitely better. And God as creator actually has the right to our obedience.

Telling people how they should think, how to feel, or what to believe, and then punishing them for not toeing the line, is not free-will, but oppression.
You really don't understand what I mean by God. This kind of argumentation can only come from someone who really doesn't get it. (Or doesn't want to) God isn't some being telling us what to do. God is the uncreated truth. His very name translates to "I am that am." God cannot not change that. (As the truth is what it is) and we can no more rebel against the truth than we can break the laws of physics. What is up to us is to determine our response to the truth. (Which is God) We can embrace it, or we can hide from it in eternal futility.

But either way, sooner or later each and every one of us will make a final and irrevocable answer.

Well, didn't Church oppress a lot of people with tortures and executions for alleged heresy and witchcraft?
Not really, your history is out of date. The inquisitions (well, the versions we've been sold for about 150 years) are largely gross exaggerations. Most of the horrors that people whine about were done by secular authorities, not the Chruch. Further, Christ promised that the Chruch would last until the end and never fall into doctrinal error in her official dogma. He never said anything about the people who comprise the Chruch organisation. They obviously, can do immoral things or fall into error. And finding that from them in the Church's history is like shooting fish in a barrel.

But that's really no argument. It's no argument against what the Chruch teaches and claims to be. Nor is it an argument that has anything to do with the discussion. Our moral accountability before God.
 
Last edited:

gnostic

The Lost One
It's not pointless. We are not given this life to do as we please.
My parents give me life, Bassist.

And before that my parents' parents gave birth them, and so forth.

What make you think God had anything to do with my life or how I came to be.

You bible just a bunch of superstitious and with very little understanding of the world, of nature.

And for another, I didn't say that we can do what we please with out life, so this is argument of yours, is straw man.

All I am saying, is that I should not be punished for what I think, feel or believe...OR what I don't think, feel or believe...depending on the question or claim.

And I ONLY know what I have learned and experienced. You want me to believe in invisible, all-powerful, all-knowing god, then where is the fricking hell is he?

If a girl believe in the Easter bunny or a fairy, and she die, would God punished her believing in them and not Him?

After all, according to your bible, believing anything or anyone other than him, is consider a sin. Would God torment for all eternity, because she believe in something else?

Do you remember what Jesus said...that it is a sin to "look" at another woman, even if nothing happen between you and that woman. Seriously, how can anyone not sin with such oppressive and restrictive rule.

And there lie the illogical stupidity of the Christian doctrine.
 

gnostic

The Lost One
Not really, your history is out of date. The inquisitions (well, the versions we've been sold for about 150 years) are largely gross exaggerations.
Actually, I wasn't talking about the inquisition of the late middle ages or early modern period.

Hersey began appearing in the 3rd century, possibly even earlier, where heresy was crushed.

Before the inquisition, Charlemagne put to death, who goodness' know how many pagan Saxons, who didn't convert, and the Pope at that time, praise the Frankish king for doing good work on behalf of that Church of yours, and in the name of Jesus or your nonexistent deity.

Would Jesus be happy or horrified at the king's action or the Pope's stance on genocide?

So spare me, your biased view of your so-called good church, Bassist.
 

Glaurung

Denizen of Niflheim
My parents give me life, Bassist.
I'm well aware of the reality of sexual reproduction. I just don't see what it has to do with God as the source of existence.

You bible just a bunch of superstitious and with very little understanding of the world, of nature.
Do you have any real point to make? You don't like Christianity, I get it. But this is a discussion of Christianity nonetheless.

And for another, I didn't say that we can do what we please with out life, so this is argument of yours, is straw man.
I said that the point of our free will is to enable our moral accountability. But for accountability to be meaningful there must be a law. When I bring this law up, you call it oppression.

All I am saying, is that I should not be punished for what I think, feel or believe...OR what I don't think, feel or believe...depending on the question or claim.
You really ought to learn about what Catholicism teaches before you attack it. It does not teach that a mere failure to be Catholic (or even Christian) will result in Hell. What will result in Hell is the obstinate refusal of the truth to the extent that you are culpable. This is only something God can judge. And you accuse me of stawmans.

And I ONLY know what I have learned and experienced. You want me to believe in invisible, all-powerful, all-knowing god, then where is the fricking hell is he?
I don't 'want' you to believe anything. You're the the one who engaged me. But if you'd like a tip in finding God, you can start though prayer, fasting, reading of the Scriptures and listing to holy music (chant) and the divine liturgy. (I personally recommend the Tridentine or Byzantine liturgies). Most importantly however is the humility to be sincerely open to the possibility of God. Otherwise it'd all be for naught. God is revealed through faith. Not blind fundamentalist fideism, but a lifelong commitment to belief, reason and practice.

But whom am I kidding? You have no such interest. And I need to improve in all of this myself as well. I've been inexcusably lazy the past few weeks.

If a girl believe in the Easter bunny or a fairy, and she die, would God punished her believing in them and not Him?

After all, according to your bible, believing anything or anyone other than him, is consider a sin. Would God torment for all eternity, because she believe in something else?
Are you sure it's me and my faith that's the problem? You seem to be expressing a ridiculous caricature of it. It makes me think that you don't really grasp what I'm really saying and what I actually believe. And your tone tells me you don't actually care to really understand. Which is fine, but it makes for futile discussion if all you really want to do is to lash-out.

Before the inquisition, Charlemagne put to death, who goodness' know how many pagan Saxons, who didn't convert, and the Pope at that time, praise the Frankish king for doing good work on behalf of that Church of yours, and in the name of Jesus or your nonexistent deity.
Oh please, none of that faux-outrage over events that occurred in the ninth century. It's tiresome. There's nothing to repent over, ninth century Europe was a very different world. I'm sorry if humanistic values weren't as practised back as we'd have it. The mediaevals weren't evil. Charlemagne and the feudal warlords like him were products of their own historical contexts. It's no scandal to admit that we have progressed for the better in many respects.

And yeah, whether you want to admit it or not the so call crimes of the Church are no where near as pervasive and context free as those with an anti-Christian axe to grind would have us believe. History is complicated, grow up.

Do you remember what Jesus said...that it is a sin to "look" at another woman, even if nothing happen between you and that woman. Seriously, how can anyone not sin with such oppressive and restrictive rule.
It's actually impossible to do without the grace of God. I fail to live to the Christian ideal all the time. In fact, I'm arguably failing now by getting dragged in to what is clearly becoming a futile discussion. (So unless you have a real point to make this will be my last response to you). Conversion is a lifelong process, and yeah, we stumble from time to time. But as a Catholic I'm blessed with the Sacraments. One of the most important is Confession. It exists because the Christian path really is that demanding. You're not expected to live a perfect life. You're expected to do your very best in trying.

And there lie the illogical stupidity of the Christian doctrine.
Where? That it's demanding? So far you've expressed nothing but a caricature of Christian belief. So your insights regarding Christian illogic don't fill me with confidence.
 
Do you understand how discussion woks? If you're questioning the Christian belief in Hell, then that question assumes for the sake of discussion that Hell exists. Turing around saying prove it was never the question.
Seriously? Do you understand that the questioning of
a belief in something also assumes that the existence of that
something is going to be called into question as well?

Also, please show me where I said "prove it".
Thanks in advance.

Being clay shaped by God is actually a far superior state than to be a robot. That clay, is in God's image. The image of truth and goodness itself. And why we are only happy in God.
Well, the bible doesn't seem to consider it all that
great if God can so casually toss it into an eternal
incinerator if He's got no more use for it.

It's a high view of humanity actually. That we're the beloved children of the one and only God. Of course, if you'd rather believe that we're mere animals here to breed and die you're free to it. But it's not me then with the low view of humanity.
You like assuming what others believe, don't you? :)
Care to try again?


-
 
Last edited:

ThirtyThree

Well-Known Member
The other day I burned my finger (only slightly, nothing serious) and I was spiraled down the rabbit hole of "what if" propelled by the idea that fire and burning is probably one of the few things that elicits an instantaneous reaction from our bodies. On contact, our bodies instantly recoil due to the instantaneous and lingering pain of a burn. That got me thinking, most human animals could not inflict that kind of lingering pain on others, aside from horrid things like Napalm used during conflicts, of course. Beyond that though, what kind of a being could stand by and watch some of its supposed creations writhing in pain for more than a few short moments - let alone, eternity?

Any thoughts justifying this would be appreciated.

A supernal who can absolutely hate as much as he can absolutely love, is what type of deity would endorse such an eternity.

It seems a lot of people, especially Christians, want to either pretend Hell does not exist, is just a temporary place of sleep prior to annihilation of the wicked or even that everyone just goes to paradise regardless of how evil they were in this world. Personally, I have no issue with Yahweh's absolutes and it confuses me why so many Christians can not accept that their deity can be ultimately violent as much as he can be ultimately compassionate or merciful. The whole double edged sword of such a being seems to leave them confused and frightened.
 

ThirtyThree

Well-Known Member
If god is all present, powerful, loving, etc then Id assume that hell cannot exist. If it did, where would it be? If everything and every place is in "the sight of god" and god cannot be in darkness, what and where can a place be thats absent from his presence?

The only hell I can think of, and I will find the scripture; its there, is separation from god. To any believer, Id assume that be worse than burns and pitch forks.

The Lake of Fire is, in my opinion, what existed before creation. To be exact, the waters of chaos. Existing there is indeed separation from Yahweh. Beyond that, use your imagination.
 

dawny0826

Mother Heathen
The other day I burned my finger (only slightly, nothing serious) and I was spiraled down the rabbit hole of "what if" propelled by the idea that fire and burning is probably one of the few things that elicits an instantaneous reaction from our bodies. On contact, our bodies instantly recoil due to the instantaneous and lingering pain of a burn. That got me thinking, most human animals could not inflict that kind of lingering pain on others, aside from horrid things like Napalm used during conflicts, of course. Beyond that though, what kind of a being could stand by and watch some of its supposed creations writhing in pain for more than a few short moments - let alone, eternity?

Any thoughts justifying this would be appreciated.

I struggle with this on certain days.

And then on others, I read of a man who rapes and murders a child and I kind of get it.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
I struggle with this on certain days.

And then on others, I read of a man who rapes and murders a child and I kind of get it.
Though I do understand, Dawn, I could not watch someone writhing in pain forever. While abusing a child is beyond my comprehension I cannot wrap my head around torturing the abuser endlessly. THAT would make me as bad, if not worse, than the abuser. I suppose I can be as vindictive as anybody else, but I do have my limits. At a certain point anyone with a scintilla of compassion would say, "Ok, I think that is enough."
 
Though I do understand, Dawn, I could not watch someone writhing in pain forever. While abusing a child is beyond my comprehension I cannot wrap my head around torturing the abuser endlessly. THAT would make me as bad, if not worse, than the abuser. I suppose I can be as vindictive as anybody else, but I do have my limits. At a certain point anyone with a scintilla of compassion would say, "Ok, I think that is enough."
There's also the fact that people who would commit such crimes
are already in a kind of hell, and/or aren't even sane to begin with.
How more of the same is supposed to rectify the situation is
beyond me.


-
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
There's also the fact that people who would commit such crimes
are already in a kind of hell, and/or aren't even sane to begin with.
How more of the same is supposed to rectify the situation is
beyond me.


-
more of the same?.....as in confinement with others of similar mind and heart.
as I mentioned earlier....
I believe the peace of heaven is guarded.
it is reported only a few find the way

the 'riff raff' cannot be allowed into kingdom ....chaos would follow

so....some kind of containment must exist
and if only a few find their way to heaven.....
then the container of hell is crowded.

I suspect the 'spacious ground' of heaven is larger and less populated.
 
more of the same?.....as in confinement with others of similar mind and heart.
as I mentioned earlier....
I believe the peace of heaven is guarded.
it is reported only a few find the way

the 'riff raff' cannot be allowed into kingdom ....chaos would follow

so....some kind of containment must exist
and if only a few find their way to heaven.....
then the container of hell is crowded.

I suspect the 'spacious ground' of heaven is larger and less populated.
But see that just makes heaven out to be some exclusive
country-club for the elites. I don't buy it.

I'm persuaded that God can do better. He holds the cure
to spiritual illness. To refrain from using it is unjust.
Unless someone likes that sort of thing, then yes, I
can see how the preservation of it somewhere for
all eternity might have a certain allure for them. I don't
get it, but there it is.


-
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
But see that just makes heaven out to be some exclusive
country-club for the elites. I don't buy it.

I'm persuaded that God can do better. He holds the cure
to spiritual illness. To refrain from using it is unjust.
Unless someone likes that sort of thing, then yes, I
can see how the preservation of it somewhere for
all eternity might have a certain allure for them. I don't
get it, but there it is.


-
picture Jesus, Judas and Hitler sharing bread and a sauce bowl....
looking each other in the eye.

what CAN you do about getting along?....
group people of similar thought and feeling

you get to spend eternity with people that think and feel like you do

How else to be happy?
how else to be fair?
 
picture Jesus, Judas and Hitler sharing bread and a sauce bowl....
looking each other in the eye.

what CAN you do about getting along?....
group people of similar thought and feeling

you get to spend eternity with people that think and feel like you do

How else to be happy?
how else to be fair?
People grow and evolve; they don't remain the same
forever.

If everyone's in tune with God, they will automatically be
in tune with each other.

I can only imagine that physical death alone would
transform a person, given that whatever likes, dislikes,
personality traits, and behaviors they had were largely
influenced by the biochemical and hormonal cocktails their
physical body was constantly generating over their
physical life-span.

The "me" that's under those influences isn't going to be the
same "me" outside of them. Someone behaving cruelly
due to whatever disorder they had, whether diagnosed or
undiagnosed, will no longer be under the influence of that
disorder once they're outside of their physical body. I
don't even think we have our egos at that point, and those
things really influence our behavior as well.

All we know about the entity we call Hitler is what that
entity did when he had his body on. We don't know what
that entity is like now—most likley, the entity is far
different (and better) than what it was when being Hitler.

Things change. People change.

We never stop being His creation; He transforms and heals
people wherever it's needed.



-
 

serp777

Well-Known Member
The other day I burned my finger (only slightly, nothing serious) and I was spiraled down the rabbit hole of "what if" propelled by the idea that fire and burning is probably one of the few things that elicits an instantaneous reaction from our bodies. On contact, our bodies instantly recoil due to the instantaneous and lingering pain of a burn. That got me thinking, most human animals could not inflict that kind of lingering pain on others, aside from horrid things like Napalm used during conflicts, of course. Beyond that though, what kind of a being could stand by and watch some of its supposed creations writhing in pain for more than a few short moments - let alone, eternity?

Any thoughts justifying this would be appreciated.

Well, the christian God would make a place like hell. Furthermore, allah would make a place like hell. There are many other examples.
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
Well, the christian God would make a place like hell. Furthermore, allah would make a place like hell. There are many other examples.

Please tell us where in Scripture the Christian God (the God of the Bible) makes a place like hell.
KJV translated the word Gehenna into English as hellfire. Gehenna was just a garbage pit outside of Jerusalem where things were destroyed Not burning forever.
The ' Bible's hell ' is simply mankind stone-cold temporary grave for the unconscious dead.
If ' biblical hell ' was a permanent place Jesus would still be in hell - Acts of the Apostles 2:27; Psalms 16:10; Acts of the Apostles 13:30,37
Jesus taught (Not pain) but sleep in death - John 11:12-14
Sleep in death is also what the old Hebrew Scriptures teach about the condition of the dead:
- Psalms 6:5; Psalms 13:3; Psalms 115:17; Psalms 146:4; Daniel 12:2; Daniel 12:13; Ecclesiastes 9:5
So, there is a BIG difference between the teaching of a religious-myth permanent hell of forever burning, and the Bible's temporary hell (grave) for the sleeping dead (R.I.P.)
Often clergy teach that non-biblical ' religious-myth hell ' teaching as Scripture in order to use scare tactics to try to control their flock by using the fear of fire on them.
Their wrong teaching does Not make the Bible's teaching as wrong, but makes their wrong teaching about hell as wrong.
 
Top