I heard that Putin 's conditions are sensible .
Why just not accept his conditions?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What makes Putin tick:
- Thread starter stvdv
- Start date
I heard that Putin 's conditions are sensible .
Why just not accept his conditions?
What are they?
The way things are going for Putin,
Ukraine might become the one
dictating conditions.
May he & his invaders die a quick death.
Heyo
Veteran Member
[citation needed]
We have worse constitutional problems than that.
We still have US bases here, namely Rammstein. We know the US uses Rammstein to relay drone operator commands (and possibly drone operators in Rammstein). The bases are not extraterritorial but rented off so that German law applies. US drone strikes are obviously against article 26 (preparation and conduction of an attack war, or, sometimes, simple murder).
Why are the bases still here? We ask the Amis if they do something illegal on the ground they have rented, they say "no" and we pretend to believe them. And that is OK with the Bundesverfassungsgericht.
I guess Putin just wants Crimea and Donbas.
And all the Soros stuff to get out of Ukraine, of course
Last edited:
Do you oppose supplying Ukraine with anti-missile systems,Yes...it is a very interesting turn of events
ie, weapons that shoot down only incoming Russian missiles?
BVG May 5 2020.
It was a historic moment that finally made people understand how rotten the Troika is.
I do.
The only help I can provide is humanitarian aid and diplomatic solutions.
stvdv
Veteran Member
That ship has sailed I would say
Heyo
Veteran Member
Yes, sadly. I can imagine Xi's smile getting wider and wider.
Heyo
Veteran Member
I fail to see the relevance regarding weapons send to Ukraine.
I am not the only one who says it is uncostitutional.
Here they are saying it is not compatible with art. 11 of our Constitution.
We all want this war to finish immediately.
Heyo
Veteran Member
Good idea. Let's ask the one who started it when he intends to stop.
I think he also wants a demilitarised Ukraine - so they will not be a threat to Russia, but the larger and more militarised one (Russia) can be a threat to the Ukraine. So how is that at all sane let alone fair?
This means that it's better (more ethical?) to let the
Russian missiles land, destroy buildings, & kill Ukrainians
than to render Russian missiles harmless. Most odd.
Well...as far as I know...the last missile hit a Russian majority city...Donetsk.
And the perpetrators were not Russians.
Are you claiming that the missiles you don't want
shot down are not Russian missiles at all?
I did not get the sentence.
I'm having trouble discerning just what point
you're making because so many posts seem
like either non-sequiturs or counter-points or
something else. I don't know which.
I am saying that Ukrainians launched a rocket onto civilians in Donetsk.
Few days ago.
Evidence?
And is this to justify your view that Ukrainians should not
be using anti-missile systems against Russian missiles?
The missiles should be allowed to land in Ukraine?