You and yourself?There are already several posters arifying what you're getting wrong.
Which definition of mine are you referring to?And that is that you definition defines nothing, and therefor everything.
In a very broad definition of the word atheism this is correct. The word atheism has many definitions and subsets, so to refer to the most broad meaning will leave the interpretaton to the other. One major flaw you have is a talent to use many words to weave incoherent explanations of how you think human knowledge works. You love to be confused, but don't let using words get in the way. You even wrote recently that language is inadequate to describe reality. False, it is very good at describing reality when used for that purpose, and with the intent to express knowledge. You seem to disdain this as much as atheists, who as a category are well informed and can distill nonsense from factual explanations.Toads are atheists. Trees are atheists. Anything that can't or won't think is an atheist.
Much the same way not being a cyclist involves no movement, no thinking, no focus, no effort, etc.Because by your definition atheism is thoughtless, and pointless, and devoid of any intellectual substance or value.
Oddly your statement here is what blind faith is. Atheism has been resolved in the mind. Atheists have done the work to examine whether religious ideas are credible and believable. Atheists do give believers the chance to present arguments for why gods exist, but they consistently lack evidence, the one crucial element. Atheists have done the homework and theists offer nothing new.
What theists claim is is the emptiness. This doesn't mean that people can have religious feelings and experiences and it inspires them to be as good a person as they are capable. I'm not talking about this. Such folks are like my grandmother who, along with her friends at church, would feed about 200 people twice a week. They never once talked about Jesus or Christianity. They served their fellow citizens. To my mind this is the best way to show how Christianity is a valid spiritual path. Trying to argue it in debate? No, theists can't win. That they don't realize this is why they fail.All these must be provided by the theist or the empty silence that results is "atheism".