Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That both circumcisions are going to be compared whether people like it or not.
You understand what I was getting at, though, right? You can't really criticize one and ignore the other in your criticisms, even if it seems 'justified' to do so.
Then you lost me on what your argument is.
That's my take on this too. To compare the two is to trivialize FGM. It is not a mere "cosmetic tweak".
They're both circumcision, and they both have a religious origin. You're statement is...wrong.
I believe the differences between the two is obvious. I believe trying to "level the playing field" between the two in the outrage factor is intellectually dishonest.
i beg to differ...
religion justifies it.
Justifies what?
i guess god was only kidding when he created the clitoris and the foreskin
:sarcastic:
i beg to differ...
religion justifies it.
Hey, circumcision isn't part of my culture, however I don't have a strong opinion about male circumcision, really. You can take up this argument with those who disagree with your opinion.
It does? Religion justifies FGM or are you only referring to male circumcision?
I think my comments have been valid. And it is about intellectual honesty.
male...
i'm not so sure about the female...
but i wouldn't be surprised if there are those who would twist scripture to justify it being done to women.
And if male circumcision were remotely comparable to FGM, I'd be just as nonchalant about that. The female equivalent to male circumcision is removal of the clitoral hood, nothing else.On my "Circumcision: for or against" (male circumcision only) thread, some of the responses from females were very nonchalant, go figure, right?...But there is obviously a female bias here, when something concerns them it becomes far more important.
I think my comments have been valid. And it is about intellectual honesty.
What have your comments been besides "You have to compare both male and female circumcision"? Okay... that's been done multiple times.
Are you suggesting that posters here are being dishonest? Dishonest about what?