Moon Woman said:
That's quite a sweeping negative assumption and says more about your beliefs than theirs.
It's not a "sweeping" negative assumption, it's a specific negative assumption based on a specific set of claims. And what exactly do you think this says about my beliefs, since you seem to imagine that it says so much?
Moon Woman said:
Funny, I have a lot of Christian friends and none of them believes God is a big vengeful monster waiting to throw unsuspecting souls into the hungry mouth of a fiery furnace. What I hear is much, much different from what you think or imagine.
Well, I have met many a Christian who DOES believe in a jealous and vengeful God, and who revel in the idea (based on their interpretation of the Book of Revelations) that this jealous and vengeful God is going to severely punish all those of us who dared not to believe as they believe. And as I said before, if you don't believe they exist, I can introduce you to some of them.
Moon Woman said:
For God so loved the world he gave His only begotten Son to die for us, that whosoever should believe on HIm should not perish but have everlasting life, and that sort of thing.[/I]
.... Thus clearly implying that those who DON'T "believe on him" WILL perish in everlasting death.
Moon Woman said:
Beyond objecting to the unfair application of assumptions to a group of people none of us (except the author of this thread) knows personally, my contribution was rather minimal here and in no way deserved the tone you have adopted towards me.
Perhaps I was reacting to the crack about how my comments say more about me than them, implying some negative motive on my part, but then never clarifying this implication. When I posted my opinion about the motives of the people being referred to in the opening post, I stated that it was an opinion and I clarified why I held it. If you wish to impugn my motives, then I'd ask that you be honest enough to do the same, and not take vague pot-shots at me.
Moon Woman said:
Judging by the harshness of your comments I'd have to assume you have some bone to pick with me personally.
I have no bones to pick with you or anyone. I respond to what I read in the posts as I believe appropriate, and I don't know a thing about you or anyone else who posts, here, personally. If my comments seem harsh perhaps it's because your own comments were not as amiable as you had intended them to be. Or perhaps I misunderstood them. It's easy to do when all we have are words on a computer screen to go by.
Moon Woman said:
Rather than distracting from the rest of the posts I'd just as soon let people decide for themselves who is mischaracterizing whom.
I don't see any need for anyone to be mischaracterizing anyone. I offered a negative opinion about the possible motivations of some Christian's beliefs, and resultant behaviors. That is not a mischaracterization of you, of them, or of anyone else. It's an opinion. And so far, the only argument you seem to have to counter my opinion is that you personally have not met any Christians who believe God is jealous and vengeful and who LIKE that image of God. And all I can say to you in response is that I have met them, and I can introduce you to a web site where you can meet them, too, if you really don't think they exist.