Are all people who disagree with you rude?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What's purpose to lable this DIR"Evolution Vs. Creationism"
- Thread starter Godobeyer
- Start date
Are all people who disagree with you rude?
No, not all of them.
Shad
Veteran Member
One based on the argument at hand rather than how you feel. All you have done is appeal to your emotions as a basis for rejecting an argument which is fallacious basis as appeals to emotions are a fallacy.
gnostic
The Lost One
Muslims didn't invent trigonometry. They didn't even invent algebra.
The Egyptians and the Babylonians have been using algebra in their works in the 1st half of the second millennium BCE.
The Babylonian and Egyptian mathematicians may not have invented symbolic algebra, there are number of ways to solve algebra problems or equations.
The Babylonian mathematicians were the first to solve the quadratic and cubic equations, as can be seen in one example, the Plimpton 322 tablet, where it solve their equation through the use of tables. The Babylonians invented what is called "rhetorical algebra" and often used geometry to use solve their equations. The Greek mathematicians also used geometry to solve algebraic equations, in the next millennium.
The Rhind papyrus was written in Egyptian hieratic, showed they have mastered linear equations.
And you can't use or understand geometry, without getting involve in trigonometry.
Muslims did start the next phase of algebra, which I have already mentioned - the symbolic algebra, which was later used by mathematicians in Europe.
No one here is denying Muslim's contributions to mathematics and science, but I wouldn't say they "invented" them. They did pioneer in "symbolic" algebra and they did coin the name for this type of mathematics, but they didn't invent algebra.
Last edited:
This actualy talks about you, you rejecting the arguments "pro-Islam" based on emotions "hate" of Islam.
Shad
Veteran Member
Considering I have provided evidence that your own arguments are rejected by your fellow Muslims for being well based on ignorance your point is false. Try again son, may try thinking next time....
Beside you linked the Big Bang miracle. I pointed out the errors in your argument. I then provided a Muslim view of your argument from a physicist point out the same error and more from his field. Perhaps he is right. Most Muslims are lazy and ignorant.
I know who I am talking to.
Shad
Veteran Member
Yet you have no idea what you are talking about....
At least I have idea who I talking to
Shad
Veteran Member
At least I have idea who I talking to
Irrelevant. Knowing who you are talking to does nothing to show you know what you are talking about.
If you know the source, you will know by 99%,what coming through that source
Shad
Veteran Member
If you know the source, you will know by 99%,what coming through that source
Irrelevant tripe. You have done nothing to establish your source is reliable or even true. I can make the same claim. My source gives me knowledge that your source is wrong. My source is superior to your source. See how easy it is to make claims without support?
It's not about irrelevant or not, fact is you are anti-Islam.
Shad
Veteran Member
Hardly. I am anti-ignorance. Your arguments fit this criteria. You just happen to be a very easy target since you wallow in ignorance and post these horrible arguments a lot.
I support agnostic Islam, a new emerging view that rejects the gnostic view point and literialism. If I was anti-Islam I would reject this as well. I do not. Cry wolf more son.
This is exactly what I said you did before. You can not separate your arguments for Islam. You treat your arguments as if it is part of Islam, it isn't. You project your ego and arguments on to Islam then cry wolf only due to your projections, nothing more. This is plain arrogance
Last edited:
I am anti-ignorance and anti-arrogance that you used.
You deny that Muslims had not any infact on science or invent anything in past, which is far from the truth.
Just google : Muslims golden age and europe dark age.
Europeans Dark Ages the Muslim golden age
Shad
Veteran Member
Hardly as you rely on the miracle arguments
No I didn't since I didn't even object to 3 out of the 5 from your list posted days ago. I objected to only 2. One was based on a 15th century poem and the other was algebra. Your reading abilities are lacking.
This is a child's film, not a history book. Your film still makes the same mistake you do. It takes unreliable sources as fact or creates distorts contribution made as if it had greater impact than it did. You do not fact check anything it claims, that is your problem. Calling someone anti-Islam for rejecting your claims as false is not to be anti-Islam. It just shows I do more research than you do.
If you want to see a true advances look at astronomy and navigation.
As brief :
Since Muslims were in golden age, Europe was in dark age.
Your anti-Islam is brillant like sun.
Shad
Veteran Member
So? The Tang dynasty was a golden age when Europe was in the dark ages. Also the dark ages are in fact a myth. It is called as such due to a lack of records not progress. You are repeating a popculture myth which again shows you do not educate yourself regarding topics you bring up
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Ages_(historiography)#Modern_academic_use
Nope I am rejecting some of your claims. I pointed out advancement already, you ignore these. Cry wolf more son.
Do you have some degree of graduation in "blah blah" ?