Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Suppose there were a person whose gender would be indeterminate at birth. Let's say this person matures into a person with an overdeveloped clitoris / underdeveloped penis. What type of sexual behavior from such a person would be permissible, according to the Bible?
Nothing directly, but they would be required I think to find out if they were able to either bear children or inseminate. Depending upon their capability they would proceed from there. If they couldn't reproduce at all then no sexual behavior would be required I think. That is -- if they were taking the command seriously to be fruitful and multiply.Suppose there were a person whose gender would be indeterminate at birth. Let's say this person matures into a person with an overdeveloped clitoris / underdeveloped penis. What type of sexual behavior from such a person would be permissible, according to the Bible?
There are chromesome tests that determine male or female.Suppose there were a person whose gender would be indeterminate at birth. Let's say this person matures into a person with an overdeveloped clitoris / underdeveloped penis. What type of sexual behavior from such a person would be permissible, according to the Bible?
Suppose there were a person whose gender would be indeterminate at birth. Let's say this person matures into a person with an overdeveloped clitoris / underdeveloped penis. What type of sexual behavior from such a person would be permissible, according to the Bible?
Nothing directly, but they would be required I think to find out if they were able to either bear children or inseminate. Depending upon their capability they would proceed from there. If they couldn't reproduce at all then no sexual behavior would be required I think. That is -- if they were taking the command seriously to be fruitful and multiply.
There are chromesome tests that determine male or female.
There are chromesome tests that determine male or female.
I don't think ancient goat herders were that advanced, though.
Suppose they were advanced enough to do genetic testing that resulted in the detection of 46,XX/46,XY "true hermaphroditism" genetic condition caused by chimerism, what gender would they have considered somebody like this to be?
If they were that advanced, the bible would be so radically different that it would be a moot point.
Suppose they were advanced enough to do genetic testing that resulted in the detection of 46,XX/46,XY "true hermaphroditism" genetic condition caused by chimerism, what gender would they have considered somebody like this to be?
I also take it non-literally; however the OP is asking about very literal bronze age living where its a lot more dangerous to have babies, women don't live as long, babies often die young etc. They have more of a problem keeping the population up. Also suppose your family carries an important virtue such as a tradition of peace. You might infer an ethical requirement to reproduce.The command to be fruitful and multiply has nothing to do with having offspring, in the spiritual. To me, the literal Word is only a container for the incredible beauty hidden within. The Divine design guarantees the species will perpetuate itself. Nearly 8 billion people running around this planet is evidence.
Nothing directly, but they would be required I think to find out if they were able to either bear children or inseminate. Depending upon their capability they would proceed from there. If they couldn't reproduce at all then no sexual behavior would be required I think. That is -- if they were taking the command seriously to be fruitful and multiply.
I would be circumspect about it, since it is part of a commentary about divorce. He is suggesting I think that though there is the command to procreate its better to live like a eunuch than to have a hard heart towards a wife, and if you can't be nice then don't get married. He also implies divorce happens because of the man's hard heart. Its significant as it interprets the law which says if a man finds something wrong with his wife he should divorce her. A hermaphrodite ( a fairly rare case probably ) is not specifically referred to. Also I think its not suggesting that a eunuch is holier than a married man. Its just saying there is no point in marrying if you're going to be a jerk. Just stay single if you can't be a decent husband. There are other points of the law that circumspectly suggest that and Bible stories, too. Jesus is not saying anything innovative. Its what we would call common sense.I wonder if Matt 19:12 would apply to them? I would think so.
Why do you ask a question like this?Suppose there were a person whose gender would be indeterminate at birth. Let's say this person matures into a person with an overdeveloped clitoris / underdeveloped penis. What type of sexual behavior from such a person would be permissible, according to the Bible?
Androgynos - WikipediaSuppose there were a person whose gender would be indeterminate at birth. Let's say this person matures into a person with an overdeveloped clitoris / underdeveloped penis. What type of sexual behavior from such a person would be permissible, according to the Bible?
I would be circumspect about it, since it is part of a commentary about divorce. He is suggesting I think that though there is the command to procreate its better to live like a eunuch than to have a hard heart towards a wife, and if you can't be nice then don't get married. He also implies divorce happens because of the man's hard heart. Its significant as it interprets the law which says if a man finds something wrong with his wife he should divorce her. A hermaphrodite ( a fairly rare case probably ) is not specifically referred to. Also I think its not suggesting that a eunuch is holier than a married man. Its just saying there is no point in marrying if you're going to be a jerk. Just stay single if you can't be a decent husband. There are other points of the law that circumspectly suggest that and Bible stories, too. Jesus is not saying anything innovative. Its what we would call common sense.