• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

whats your beef with brexit?

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Give me Tommy Robinson over Bercow any day. At least Tommy has British values.

...and he shows indignation when a UK soldier is victimized by the animal world.

Dv9WydCWwAAnaew.jpg
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Unfortunately this is not a game. The Italians are disgusted because last May they have seen how far the Brussels élites can go...they have tried to prevent the euroskeptics legitimately elected from ruling.
The same élites are now manipulating the British Parliament.
I take it that what you are claiming connects to this somehow?

2018 Italian government formation - Wikipedia
 

Notanumber

A Free Man
Sovereignity is a fiction at the best of times. No one should lose any sleep over it.

The UK should be thankful that we had Churchill the last time the country needed to be defended.

If we submit to the EU and their Remoaner supporters, all that will have been in vain.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
The UK should be thankful that we had Churchill the last time the country needed to be defended.

If we submit to the EU and their Remoaner supporters, all that will have been in vain.
If you say so.

Myself, I prefer to put fiction on its proper place.
 

Altfish

Veteran Member
The UK should be thankful that we had Churchill the last time the country needed to be defended.

If we submit to the EU and their Remoaner supporters, all that will have been in vain.
Is that the same Churchill who in a letter to Eden in 1942 said ...
"I look forward to a United States of Europe, in which the barriers between the nations will be greatly minimised and unrestricted travel will be possible.’
 

Altfish

Veteran Member
How things change 2016 v 2019

2016: We have to Brexit. It will be brilliant for Britain.
2019: We have to Brexit. Or fascists will get crosser.

2016:“There will be no downsides to Brexit only considerable upsides”
2019:“You will have enough calories to survive”

2016: Brexit will be amazing!
2019: A no-deal Brexit is not "suicide" "survivable" and better than Dunkirk

2016- "Food will be plentiful & much cheaper"
2017 - "There won't be any shortages"
2018 - "We will have adequate food"
2019- "You might have to fight the bouncer at your local ASDA"

2016: “Opportunity! Sovereignty! Prosperity!”
2019: “We need to practise traffic jams

2016: there will be no downsides to Brexit, only considerable upsides
2017: there will be adequate medicine
2018: we will ship in the adequate medicine on emergency ferries if we must!
2019: the ferry company doesn't have any boats

2016
"We'll take back control"
"We'll have blue passports"
"We'll have £350m a week for the NHS"
2018
We'll be stockpiling blood, food, medicine & we've spent more on Brexit than we do on EU payments as well as losing £300m a week from the economy.
2019
Passports for dinner?!

2016 ‘Brexit will make Britain global!’
2019 - ‘You must check with the government before you book a holiday abroad’

2016 Brexiters: No sharks after Brexit
2017: Nobody said there wouldn't be sharks
2019: You all voted for sharktown
 

Notanumber

A Free Man
Just imagine what Junker would have been like if we had sent this woman over instead of Mrs May.

He would have been putty in her hands.


 

Notanumber

A Free Man
You believe what you like but he certainly envisioned a united Europe.

Even what you have quoted / linked talks of that.

I wonder if Churchill supported Kalergi because Hitler unsurprisingly had utter contempt for Kalergi.

It does look like the EU and the UN are modelling themselves on the Kalergi Plan.

However, we still have a lot to thank Churchill for during the war.
 

Terrywoodenpic

Oldest Heretic
I wonder if Churchill supported Kalergi because Hitler unsurprisingly had utter contempt for Kalergi.

It does look like the EU and the UN are modelling themselves on the Kalergi Plan.

However, we still have a lot to thank Churchill for during the war.

The Kalergi plan went far beyond Europe and envisioned a new world order.
Hitler would have not liked it because it did not center itself on German or Arian supremacy and he though it was run by masons.
Churchill was a Francaphile and had a love of Europe.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
I wonder if Churchill supported Kalergi because Hitler unsurprisingly had utter contempt for Kalergi.

It does look like the EU and the UN are modelling themselves on the Kalergi Plan.

However, we still have a lot to thank Churchill for during the war.
Kalergi was a frustrated evil man that had inferiority complexes for being a mongrel. So he wanted to destroy the European races through miscegenation.
He was the first to receive the Charlemagne Prize, for putting the criminal plan called EU into action...(a plan of destruction of European nation-states and European identities and the creation of a banking dictatorship). Even the Vatican was occupied by these Freemasonic delinquents: just figure that John Paul II and Francis I received the Charlemagne Prize, whereas John Paul I was assassinated for opposing those plans.
And who knows why Ratzinger resigned....

kalergi4.jpg
 
Top