• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

whats your beef with brexit?

Notanumber

A Free Man
How to reconcile the country - Not

This country is going down fast, it will not recover in my life; I'm so disappointed with the right wing money people who have got us here, the press that hide the truth if it doesn't suit their agenda.
The likes of Rees-Mogg and Bannon and Johnson and Tim Martin will be quids in if we crash out.

I am glad that I don’t worship money or envy those that have more than I do.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Does the EU give money to Brazil, if so, how much?
What do you even mean by "giving money"? Are we talking about trade?

Surely you know that there has been very recent talk about a trade deal? And that our own comedian chief of the executive blundered it?
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
The point, @England my lionheart , is that it is at the very least legit to ask whether such a result has - or should even be allowed to claim - such impressive power without the ability of Parliament to overrule it.

You do not vote for your generals, your engineers, or even your cabinet ministers. And by the same token, it is not a direct referendum's business to rule on anything nearly as major and technical as a "Brexit" - something that, to this day, is only defended because it is skilfully presented in a very ambiguous way that hides how undefined and destructive it would be.

The 2016 referendum would probably not even happen had it been proposed as legally binding back in the day.

In a way, it is too bad that it wasn't. Would have spared the British a lot of grief and harm.
 

England my lionheart

Rockerjahili Rebel
Premium Member
The point, @England my lionheart , is that it is at the very least legit to ask whether such a result has - or should even be allowed to claim - such impressive power without the ability of Parliament to overrule it.

You do not vote for your generals, your engineers, or even your cabinet ministers. And by the same token, it is not a direct referendum's business to rule on anything nearly as major and technical as a "Brexit" - something that, to this day, is only defended because it is skilfully presented in a very ambiguous way that hides how undefined and destructive it would be.

The 2016 referendum would probably not even happen had it been proposed as legally binding back in the day.

In a way, it is too bad that it wasn't. Would have spared the British a lot of grief and harm.

Government could have overruled it,as I said before,government is sovereign and by proposing and endorsing the referendum it becomes legal.
 

ratiocinator

Lightly seared on the reality grill.
Government could have overruled it,as I said before,government is sovereign...

No, the government isn't sovereign, Parliament is sovereign.

Parliamentary sovereignty is a principle of the UK constitution. It makes Parliament the supreme legal authority in the UK, which can create or end any law. Generally, the courts cannot overrule its legislation and no Parliament can pass laws that future Parliaments cannot change. Parliamentary sovereignty is the most important part of the UK constitution.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
No, the government isn't sovereign, Parliament is sovereign.

Parliamentary sovereignty is a principle of the UK constitution. It makes Parliament the supreme legal authority in the UK, which can create or end any law. Generally, the courts cannot overrule its legislation and no Parliament can pass laws that future Parliaments cannot change. Parliamentary sovereignty is the most important part of the UK constitution.

No...you are wrong...the Government has the executive power...whereas the Parliament the legislative power..
Which implies the Government is supposed to put the referendum results into action through decrees.
But as far as I know...you guys have no written Constitution...so it is confusing...
 
Last edited:
Top