Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The strongest evidence of God's existence is the billions of people that claim to benefit from God's existence, that's pretty scientific.
We don't have to prove anything, just accept that God exists.
What are you so afraid of, that people might learn about God in school, and make up their own mind and start believing in God, perish the thought, I see you must be afraid, what a catastrophe for the forces of darkness.
I don't know if you know this, but most civilized countries, like my country, Australia, teach a world religions course in High school.
Polling peoples opinions is actually a part of science, a lot of scientific studies involve sample interview and polling of people to come to conclusions.
Just to give you an example of a scientific testing of the effects of God, you could poll people diagnosed with cancer, and see if there is any difference in the survival rate for people that are religious or have a lot of friends and relatives praying for them vs, atheist and non believers survival rate.
It doesn't surprise me at all that you would write such a thing as you've written even far worse about Jews and Israel many times before.In all fairness I might hate God if God actually was as "he" is described in the Old Testament, but I don't believe in that God, I think he's a figment of the misogynist Jews imagination.
I don't know and I doubt it, in that order.So you don't think Jews made up major portions of the Bible???? That Jews are the master race, chosen by God???
I, too, believe in God but I also admit that I have no evidence of God and that it is entirely possible that my beliefs are my own delusions about what I want to believe. It seems fair to me to admit that there is zero evidence of God. I am not sure why you are so adamant that you see God as real. Can you point to something that is 100% proven of God?I don't think any experimental evidence could possibly disprove God, because God exists.
I see nothing wrong with a world religion course that teaches the rudiments of each and every faith there is. That is vastly different than teaching belief in a God, no matter which one one might name. I am curious what about the US Constitution you find so 'stupid'. Please elaborate on that one. I agree with you about gun control but unfortunately, I am in the minority here. The NRA has far too loud a voice, IMO, in matters of state. I firmly believe that even police at this point should only carry weapons after many hours of teaching, given the recent police problems we have here.I don't know if you know this, but most civilized countries, like my country, Australia, teach a world religions course in High school. America has a stupid constitution, that makes them do some stupid things IMHO. We also have gun control and one of the lowest per capita firearm fatality rates, less than 10% that of the USA I believe, call us primitives.
If that is what you see wrong with the Constitution, I totally agree with you. We should have national healthcare and the fact we don't is an embarrassment, IMO. And that children here still go hungry is another thing I hate. The election we have pending is but one example of the things that are beyond wrong here in this country. Trump is a bully and a loud mouthed braggart who would be the worst ever president but Clinton is not that much better. Just marginally better than Trump. So we agree about that part but there are some things in the Constitution that are good, and one has to take those things along with the things that are wrong. Things are changing however. Such as SSM and so on.The biggest flaw, it doesn't guarantee basic subsistence living and health care for all citizens, that's what my essay is about, the other issues of what should go into a constitution are not really my field of expertise.
I don't know and I doubt it, in that order.
Do you believe Jews made up most that's found in the N.T.? Do you believe Christians formed the newly "chosen by God"? Even hear of the expression "double-standards", Lyndon?
One wonders what those 76% would do if the Constitution were abolished
today?
Our freedoms likely would not exist as it does.
We likely would not be discussing anything here either.
Would we have the various religions, political processes, care for the
less fortunate, vast melting pot of cultures, .......................................................????
Ferriners are so ignorant about not just our Constitution, but about the function of a constitution in general.People all over the world in different countries than the USA live perfectly fine without our constitution, they all have their own constitutions, many if not most of them newer, more recent, less primitive in that they never condoned slavery, gun rights, denying women and minorities the right to vote, like our constitution originally did as written, Their constitutions are in many ways better and worse than our present constitution, If our constitution was really that special, countries would be copying it all over the world, its just a template for American style of government, doesn't protect or provide food, lodging or medical care for every citizen, in many more socialized countries those things are practically guaranteed to all citizens.. Americans tend to be very Myopic about their constitution.
But that's not what the N.T. states.No I firmly don't believe any race, tribe, country, religion or non religion is any more or less chosen by God
You are correct that spirituality is a benefit in healthcare. Nursing's new paradigm's now incorporate spirituality as an integral part of that whole. That being said however, as a nurse with over 40 years experience in critical care, I can also report that by and large those who refuse to let loved ones pass quietly with appropriate pain control are Christian. And btw sir, I have done several studies of spirituality and religion in healthcare and all of it is anecdotal. Literally. One cannot measure for these types of studies that are quantitative. By its nature, it is always qualitative. The two are vastly different when it comes to validity and reliability. There is no way to accurately measure for psychological variables. Some scientists tried years ago but most of those studies were at best, unethical.Just to give you an example of a scientific testing of the effects of God, you could poll people diagnosed with cancer, and see if there is any difference in the survival rate for people that are religious or have a lot of friends and relatives praying for them vs, atheist and non believers survival rate. Of course you could claim any benefits for believers was all psychological, and their belief in God tricked them to fight or not fight the cancer, but at least it would give some scientific testing of the benefits or detriments of being a believer or not.
This has not been my experience Demon. In fact, quite the opposite. Those with families who are deeply religious tend to not let loved ones die, even when their suffering is so profound as to make doctors tell us to do what is called a 'slow code' meaning we walk VERY slowly to resuscitate the patient.One of the studies showed that knowledge of prayer resulted in serious complications in 59% of the people vs. only 51% in those who were either not prayed for or were prayed for without their knowledge.
Just sayin'. I saw another study where it suggested people who are waiting for God to save them may "give up" more and have less tendency to fight for life.
So this idea that it may not hurt anything may just not be true.
But that's not what the N.T. states.
You are correct that spirituality is a benefit in healthcare. Nursing's new paradigm's now incorporate spirituality as an integral part of that whole. That being said however, as a nurse with over 40 years experience in critical care, I can also report that by and large those who refuse to let loved ones pass quietly with appropriate pain control are Christian. And btw sir, I have done several studies of spirituality and religion in healthcare and all of it is anecdotal. Literally. One cannot measure for these types of studies that are quantitative. By its nature, it is always qualitative. The two are vastly different when it comes to validity and reliability. There is no way to accurately measure for psychological variables. Some scientists tried years ago but most of those studies were at best, unethical.