When President Biden said “It's time to put Trump in the bullseye", he gave anyone an open hunting license to shoot Trump

[Redneck Mystic]

Fair enough........ If you would be kind enough to show exactly what Mr Biden said, both before and after that phrase.

Fair enough........ If you would be kind enough to show exactly what Mr Biden said, both before and after that phrase.

Excerpts:

Defiant Biden tells donors: 'We're done talking about the debate'

Biden delivered a forceful message in a private call with his National Finance Committee, which includes hundreds of top Democratic donors and bundlers.

By SARAH FERRIS and ELENA SCHNEIDER0

7/08/2024

A defiant President Joe Biden insisted to his donors on Monday that he is “done talking about the debate” and implored the party to ignore any further distractions and direct its attention back to Donald Trump.“We need to move forward. Look, we have roughly 40 days til the convention, 120 days til the election. We can’t waste any more time being distracted,” Biden said in a private call with donors Monday, according to a recording obtained by POLITICO.“I have one job, and that’s to beat Donald Trump. I’m absolutely certain I’m the best person to be able to do that. So, we’re done talking about the debate, it’s time to put Trump in a bullseye,” Biden said.

The forceful message from Biden — which was delivered to hundreds of top Democratic donors and bundlers in the president's National Finance Committee — is the latest evidence that the president and his allies are working furiously to stem defections in the party. Earlier in the day, Biden sent a fiery missive to congressional Democrats, declaring his intentions to remain in the race even as roughly a half-dozen members have publicly called for him to bow out.

 

[We Never Know]

FOX "News" (more like Faux Noise) isn't a trustworthy news source. People who read it have already made up there mind's. In otherwords your credibility crashes to zero when you cite it.

As a researcher, Ivy League PhD holder and now professor one of the first things we learn to do (& teach other's to do is to vet there sources). Anyone who quotes biased sources either is (a) dishonest and has an agenda or (b) isn't very smart. Faux Noise is not much better than ruZZian propaganda and at its core it aims to dismantle civil society. It is essentially stochastic terrorist propaganda, a thinly veiled version of "Der Sturmer" of the 1930's. They are on the side of the criminals.

Relying on Faux Noise for news is like seeking financial advice from a scammer— you might get an answer, but it'll only lead to confusion and lies.

Here is the bill link introduced by the dems. What more do you need vetted?

A Democratic bill that would have stripped Trump’s Secret Service protection detail upon sentencing for a felony conviction.

As a professor you shouldn't judge a book by its cover.

 

[Redneck Mystic]

Here is the bill link introduced by the dems. What more do you need vetted?

A Democratic bill that would have stripped Trump’s Secret Service protection detail upon sentencing for a felony conviction.

As a professor you shouldn't judge a book by its cover.

I don’t watch FOX News. Trump’s Secret Service Detail was not diminished the day he was shot, so your argument about a bill the Demis introduced, which did not pass (yet, or ever), doesn’t seem to have anything to do with what happened that day.

 

[We Never Know]

I don’t watch FOX News. Trump’s Secret Service Detail was not diminished the day he was shot, so your argument about a bill the Demis introduced, which did not pass (yet, or ever), doesn’t seem to have anything to do with what happened that day.

I haven't claimed it does

Some one said the dems wanted to strip Trump from SS protection. It was basically called BS by someone else.

I'm just showing they did want to strip Trump from SS protection.

 

[Redneck Mystic]

I haven't claimed it does

Some one said the dems wanted to strip Trump from SS protection. It was basically called BS by someone else.

I'm just showing they did want to strip Trump from SS protection.

not relevant to day of shooting

 

[Ebionite]

Official Russian media can bugger off. Of course it says Putin is the good guy trying to right a wrong.
Fortunately the reasonable people in the world don't buy Russia's nonsensical excuses. Ukraine shelled Ukrainians so Russia is going to shell and kill and rape Ukranians? But that's logic under a fascist. Two plus two equals five according to those scum types.

Putin Derangement Syndrome.

 

[We Never Know]

not relevant to day of shooting

I agree if someone claimed that.
Did someone claim that?

 

[Ebionite]

FOX "News" (more like Faux Noise) isn't a trustworthy news source. People who read it have already made up there mind's. In otherwords your credibility crashes to zero when you cite it.

Ad hominems are a losers argument.

 

[Ebionite]

So. Much. Whataboutism.

The real issue is that the acoustic signatures of the rifle shots prove that there were at least two gunmen, which proves conspiracy.

Audio Analysis Is 100% Clear: Trump & Crowd Were Shot At By Two Separate People |

There's zero doubt. Two separate weapons were fired toward Trump and the Crowd. One fired 3 rounds, the other(s?) 6 or 7 depending on how many sniper rounds were fired at Crooks. This indicates a conspiracy to assassinate Trump.

peakprosperity.com

 

[Kathryn]

The real issue is that the acoustic signatures of the rifle shots prove that there were at least two gunmen, which proves conspiracy.

Audio Analysis Is 100% Clear: Trump & Crowd Were Shot At By Two Separate People |

There's zero doubt. Two separate weapons were fired toward Trump and the Crowd. One fired 3 rounds, the other(s?) 6 or 7 depending on how many sniper rounds were fired at Crooks. This indicates a conspiracy to assassinate Trump.

peakprosperity.com

Interesting.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

Putin Derangement Syndrome.

Putin is an autocrat and fascist. According to those types 2 + 2 = 5. We see it everywhere we see such tyranny. Yes, governments lie, but it's worst under authoritarianism.

 

[oldbadger]

I..............

Hi... The post you sent to me would not respond to a reply, so I've copied one para from it, ok?
__--------------------
Excerpts:

Defiant Biden tells donors: 'We're done talking about the debate'

Biden delivered a forceful message in a private call with his National Finance Committee, which includes hundreds of top Democratic donors and bundlers.

Ah! So Mr Biden was NOT calling out anything to the whole big bad world.....he was making a private call and then got repeated.

That makes so much difference. Thank you for that.

 

[Redneck Mystic]

Hi... The post you sent to me would not respond to a reply, so I've copied one para from it, ok?
__--------------------
Excerpts:


Ah! So Mr Biden was NOT calling out anything to the whole big bad world.....he was making a private call and then got repeated.

That makes so much difference. Thank you for that.

There were hundreds of rich Democrat potential donors on that phone call, which one of them leaked, do you wonder why?

 

[metis]

Huh?

To my knowledge a felony conviction doesn't stop anyone from being president

Oops, I should have qualified it more accurately:

Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3:
"No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability."

 

[oldbadger]

There were hundreds of rich Democrat potential donors on that phone call, which one of them leaked, do you wonder why?

The call was private, and not appealing to the whole world for any kind of 'bullseye' action.

Thank you for that verification.

 

[Kathryn]

The call was private, and not appealing to the whole world for any kind of 'bullseye' action.

Thank you for that verification.

I guess like the 2016 text message that Vance thought was private. OOPS!

 

[Redneck Mystic]

Oops, I should have qualified it more accurately:

Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3:
"No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability."

The US Supreme Court said Section 3 does not apply to the presidency, or it will take an Act of Congress not make it apply, both of which rulings defy Section 3 in this old lawyer’s opinion.

 

[fantome profane]

I guess like the 2016 text message that Vance thought was private. OOPS!

Yes, but the arguments are different, the people making those arguments are using these private conversations to show different things.

Vance's private comments are being used to show Vance's state of mind. That is perfectly logical.

On the other hand some people are suggesting that Biden's private conversation had an impact on the thinking of the Trump shooter. This is not logical as the shooter had no way to be aware of such comments. It is very simple. Since Biden's comment was not public knowledge until after the assassination attempt it cannot have been a factor in that assassination attempt.

Right?

 

[Redneck Mystic]

Yes, but the arguments are different, the people making those arguments are using these private conversations to show different things.

Vance's private comments are being used to show Vance's state of mind. That is perfectly logical.

On the other hand some people are suggesting that Biden's private conversation had an impact on the thinking of the Trump shooter. This is not logical as the shooter had no way to be aware of such comments. It is very simple. Since Biden's comment was not public knowledge until after the assassination attempt it cannot have been a factor in that assassination attempt.

Right?IYes, but the arguments are different, the people making those arguments are using these private conversations to show different things.Vance's private comments are being used to show Vance's state of mind. That is perfectly logical.On the other hand some people are suggesting that Biden's private conversation had an impact on the thinking of the Trump shooter. This is not logical as the shooter had no way to be aware of such comments. It is very simple. Since Biden's comment was not public knowledge until after the assassination attempt it cannot have been a factor in that assassination attempt.Right?

By SARAH FERRIS and ELENA SCHNEIDER0

7/08/2024

A defiant President Joe Biden insisted to his donors on Monday that he is “done talking about the debate” and implored the party to ignore any further distractions and direct its attention back to Donald Trump.“We need to move forward. Look, we have roughly 40 days til the convention, 120 days til the election. We can’t waste any more time being distracted,” Biden said in a private call with donors Monday, according to a recording obtained by POLITICO.“I have one job, and that’s to beat Donald Trump. I’m absolutely certain I’m the best person to be able to do that. So, we’re done talking about the debate, it’s time to put Trump in a bullseye,” Biden said.

The comment was leaked and the press go a hold of it.

 

[fantome profane]

The comment was leaked and the press go a hold of it.

After the assassination attempt.