When Should Women Obey Their Husbands?

[Robert.Evans]

1. Bigger or stronger, does not make you superior.

Yes it does.

A little monkey is stronger than any human male, and a gorilla can be both stronger and bigger. Are they superior to YOU?

In strength? Yes!

NO! They are just stronger, or bigger. Human brains are superior to any outward appearance, or strength. And BOTH males and females have these superior brains.

Than animals yes.

2. The President of the USA had to bring up the disparity between wages, for the same jobs, between women and men, - in his State of the Union Address! Think about it. Women are still thought of as sexual body parts. Their sexualized body parts are used to sell pretty much anything. This sexualizing of women leads to such incidences, as males OINKING at women (to embarrass and demoralize) those whom don't comply with their men's sexualized ideas about women.

If you are speaking of pornography, may I ask who it is who does this in the first place, and who it is whose ego benefits and bank balance? Do you need any help?

According to the CDC - "An estimated 19.3 percent of women have been raped at one point in their lives." That is almost 1 in every 5 women.

And how many men? Though women are more worried about being assaulted when they go out, it is men who are more likely to be asaulted. Going to jump up and down about that are you in favour of men?

Additionally, they tell us - nearly 44 percent of women have experienced some other form of sexual violence; and 15 percent of women have been stalked.

Obviously A lot of work still needs to be done in this area.

*

I agree, a lot of work does need to be done. Let's start with the way women dress so you don't keep projecting one side of your personality to everyone. Of course, you could just ignore that, allow women to do what they heck they want, and then blame men, right? We could call that, oh, I don't know, what about ''equality''.

 

[Robert.Evans]

You only mention good men in your posts. God says there are no good people though. If people would have kept the truth of God and propagated it then there would have been no bad people. See?

Clearly the law is only of any use if people adhere to it.

 

[savagewind]

Clearly the law is only of any use if people adhere to it.

And people will only adhere to it if it is right.

 

[savagewind]

If you are speaking of pornography, may I ask who it is who does this in the first place, and who it is whose ego benefits and bank balance? Do you need any help?

This is grossly unfair to all the many young people taken prisoner to do porn.

I agree, a lot of work does need to be done. Let's start with the way women dress so you don't keep projecting one side of your personality to everyone. Of course, you could just ignore that, allow women to do what they heck they want, and then blame men, right? We could call that, oh, I don't know, what about ''equality''.

Very interesting. Have you forgotten already what you say "all women should be"?

 

[Robert.Evans]

And people will only adhere to it if it is right.

They might, they might not.

This is grossly unfair to all the many young people taken prisoner to do porn

You are speaking as all women seem to do, about a minority in comparison. That is breaking the law and a different subject altogether

Very interesting. Have you forgotten already what you say "all women should be"?

??

 

[savagewind]

??

On the thread about what all women should be you agreed they should be like the woman in the video. You did! I checked to see if Robert Evans' like was still there. It was. Is it still there?

 

[Wirey]

Clearly the law is only of any use if people adhere to it.

Or are made to by a civilized society. You know, like the one we live in where someone bigger than you isn't allowed t take your TV?

 

[Robert.Evans]

On the thread about what all women should be you agreed they should be like the woman in the video. You did! I checked to see if Robert Evans' like was still there. It was. Is it still there?

I have explained that.

 

[Robert.Evans]

Or are made to by a civilized society. You know, like the one we live in where someone bigger than you isn't allowed t take your TV?

As I say, the law is there to be kept, and that is for all, men and women alike

 

[savagewind]

I have explained that.

And because you are MAN I should take your explanation as reasonable. I don't.

 

[Underhill]

Did you see any qualifications to the scriptural commands I cited? Nope. There are none. Want a husband? Then be prepared to obey. PERIOD!

This is one reason, among many, I find the bible disgusting. There are too many cases like this where the book is absurd. Either god doesn't exist and it was made up by a bunch of blokes, or god is an insufferable *******. Either way I want nothing to do with it.

 

[Robert.Evans]

And because you are MAN I should take your explanation as reasonable. I don't.

I might throw the same at you madam

 

[savagewind]

I might throw the same at you madam

What explanation?

 

[Robert.Evans]

This is one reason, among many, I find the bible disgusting. There are too many cases like this where the book is absurd. Either god doesn't exist and it was made up by a bunch of blokes, or god is an insufferable *******. Either way I want nothing to do with it.

I think you will find the poster is tongue in cheek, as he is an agnostic. Scripture has to be understood. If you don't like passages that has commanded that people die for some reason, then how do you reconcile that with people dying now? Is that God? Is that man? Do you want nothing to do with mankind?

 

[Robert.Evans]

I

What explanation?

I have given it. I am not bothered how you or anyone else chooses to read it. End.

 

[savagewind]

I have explained that.

And because you are MAN I should take your explanation as reasonable. I don't.

I might throw the same at you madam

What explanation?

I
I have given it. I am not bothered how you or anyone else chooses to read it. End.

What explanation of mine do you "throw me the same"?
Do you understand the question? Does anyone?

What explanation of mine do you think is unreasonable? Not yours, mine.

 

[savagewind]

Do you understand the question?

In the USA if defense or prosecution brings up a point the subject enters the "alls fair" arena. OK?

You say you can say my explanation is unreasonable. I agree! Which one please?

 

[Robert.Evans]

Do you understand the question?

haha
savagewind on the warpath again..

 

[TashaN]

Under what conditions, if any, should a woman habitually obey her husband? Are there any conditions under which a woman should not obey her husband?

If a woman should habitually obey her husband, why should she habitually obey her husband? Is a woman who does not habitually obey her husband acting in an immoral manner?

If a woman believes her husband is a fool, should she still habitually obey him? If a woman believes her husband is abusive, should she still obey him?

Bonus Question: Why is nearly every woman on the Forum secretly in love with Debater Slayer despite his appalling taste in socks?

She can obey him only if her husband can strip for her and do a lap dance.

 

[MysticSang'ha]

I might throw the same at you madam

Robert, this whole debate and argument tactic of "I know you are but what am I?" has been done before, though unfortunately for you it's 1) unsuccessful, and 2) been done by Pee Wee Herman.