Out of curiosity, as a non Brit, can I ask what the whole deal is with Brexit?
@Brickjectivity @Rival @9-10ths_Penguin ??
I have seen lamentations over leaving the EU (from both sides of the political aisle.) And I have seen lamentations over staying (again from both sides of the political aisle.)
But I’ve also heard of “real harm” from both sides. I’m afraid I’m not clued in into the scenario. Sorry, merely curious.
As to why there’s not a lot of Conservatives/conservatives Brits on here. That well could be just because this is a niche website. So the pool is already going to be small from the offset. Of those from the pool I’d imagine you’d likely get more left leaning folks by default, since it is a bit of adventure and random happenstance to even get here. And well I mean no offence but Conservatives tend to hang out on Facebook and alternative social media sites these days. Yes even outside the US.
But that’s just speculation.
Maybe there are conservative British folks on here who are just more private about their politics and wish to focus on religious discussion. I mean the website is titled religious forums after all
A little bit of history may help.
After world war one countries in Europe became more nationalist and economically protectionist, putting up tariffs barriers on each other. Germany had special issues because it was blamed for world war one and forced to pay reparations that seriously hurt its economy and had to borrow money from the USA to pay for it. When the wall street crash happened, Germany couldn’t repay its loans to the US and was hit really badly during the great depression. The mass unemployment in Germany helped Hitler into power and the wider global impacts destabilised Europe as a continent with the far right and far left destroying democracies. This is how we got world war two.
When the Nazis were finally defeated, Europe basically didn’t want to go through that all again. As the Cold War geared up, America sent us a massive bail out with the Marshall plan and NATO was formed to resist the Soviets. The European Economic Community (EEC) was our way of making sure Europe worked together so we didn’t have another war or a major economic crisis. Ensuring we had prosperity was also a way for democracies to protect each other from fascism and communism.
Britain held back and only joined the EEC in the 1970’s. We were losing what remained of our Empire and was going through a pretty turbulent period of economic crisis and industrial unrest. So a common market to sell our goods and to create prosperity was a really attractive idea.
Around the time when communism fell, the EEC became the European Union which explicitly sought to create common laws to regulate a common market- so countries lose some sovereignty over what laws they can create. The Euro was launched as a single currency as a step towards greater economic integration and eastern European countries who were transitioning from central planning to free market capitalism, joined the EU hoping to share in the west’s prosperity. Many eastern European immigrants came to the UK offering cheap unskilled labour in hope of a better life but this caused racial tensions in some communities.
On top of this is the legacy of the 1980’s in Britain where whole industries were wiped out and many communities devastated economically. Some areas recovered, whilst others didn’t as much. So (at least the perception of) having loads of immigrants come here whilst many brits are struggling and unable to get decent job opportunities or even welfare for themselves wasn’t great. Equally, the EU is a free trade bloc that limits governments ability to intervene in their economies to ensure they can integrate. So the UK had a decade of austerity partly because of EU fiscal rules limiting government spending, making it harder for people to cope. You then have a powderkeg of racial tensions and economic hardship and many people blamed immigrants (and thus the EU because of free movement).
Alot of the heat in the Brexit debate is therefore indirectly a challenge to the model of post-war reconstruction and the lessons drawn in 1945 that nationalism threatens democracies and leads to racism, economic crisis and war. The “Remain” side emphasises the dangers of taking the economic nationalist route, whilst the “Leave” side points towards a range of grievances that the EU played at least some role in contributing to but also won’t be able to solve- immigration being the biggest one. Based on promises we won’t have more immigration, won’t have to accept EU laws and regulations and could have free trade outside the EU, we then have Brexit.
[Edit:] When the results came in support for Brexit was largely an
English issue, with the Scots and Northern Irish (and many of the Welsh) wanting to stay in the EU. Central London voted Remain but that's because it's where all the money and banking is and free trade is good for business. Many in Scotland and Wales want to leave the UK basically because England is Tory and they hate Tories and leaving the EU is just another grievance inflicting on them by Tory/English/British rule. Finally, being in the EU was for northern Ireland the best of both worlds- they were governed by Westminster, whilst being able to have an open border with the south
as if Ireland were a single country. Closing the Irish border and reminding Northern Ireland they are still part of the UK is a pretty quick way to rekindling decades of terrorism and centuries of hatred and conflict. So, we don't want to do that either.