No, you insult our intelligence by asking questions that are readily availble to anyone who takes a few minutes to look for.
Her policy positions are not clear. They are not on her website and apparently she has changed her mind on some things but that was not from her but her campaign. Instead of telling me her positions or where I can find them your go to is insults. Typical.
False, we have offred many links to her statments, and stated what we have heard her say. That you ignore the facts is your problem. Look it up. We have investigated the MAGA plans, and they are unacceptable for a modern and progressing nation
Yes, and she has made contradictory statement now. So without her clarifying her positions how do I know what her positions really are. Where are they on her website?
. She's been a candidate for how long? A month? Who needs a website when she is out talking every day in front of reporters?
No she is not. She is not answering questions from them. She is telling them what she wants to say.
No, women don't have reproductive healthcare freedom in many red states, and that is because Trump gave the far right what they wanted: a SCOTUS that would rule against Ros v Wade. MAGAs are responsble for this, and the majority in the USA don't like it. Even Kansas voted to make abortion access a constitutional right. We will see what Missouri does. If the citizens vote to allow abortion access, we could see a lot of trouble caused by conservatves.
That has nothing to do with Trump. His stance is to leave it up to the states. He is ok with some states having abortion and some not.
Meaning she wants healthcare to be a right for all citizens. Buut there will still be premium healthcare access for the wealthy.
No, she wants to take away private health insurance and take away my choice. She has said this in the past.
Meaning no more new gas cars, but existing gas cars will still be used. You seem to have a problem of the horse and buggy being replased by the gas powered automobile. Tough, conservatives need to acknowledge that the world progresses. Feel free to give up your internet and live in caves.
The horse and buggy was replaced by the free market. It was not mandated by the government. That is what I have a problem with. Do you understand the difference
False. She wants to monitor companies who are inflating the price of certain foods to make excessive profits. This isn't a new thing for governments to do. It's related to antitrust laws. But what do conservatives want to do? Let the markets dictate prices.
Yes, as long as there is competition.
Well that is why much of the inflation the world faced happened, the markets inflating vrices. And then you conservatives complain about inflation. You can't have it both ways.
Are you serious. Companies do not cause inflation, governments do.
You certainly don't. I've not heard her say anything like this.
Harris's quotes on border wall:
President Trump’s border wall is “un-American.” Harris
Trump’s border wall is a “medieval vanity project
“I’m not gonna vote for a [border] wall under any circumstances
“Trump’s border wall is a complete waste of taxpayer money and won’t make us any safer.
Her own words to decriminilize illegal crossings.:
And don't forget (which I'm sure you have) that congress had a border refom bill that would have passed, but Trump sabotaged it. So you have zero right to complain about anything happening at the border.
negatory good buddy. You have bought the leftist propaganda.
Here are some of the reasons why the conservatives did not support the border wall:
1. Under current law the president has authority to shutdown the border if he deem sit detrimental to the US. This law would have limited the president's authority until the 7 day average border crossings is above 4000.
2. It also states that this legislation cannot be activated for more than 270 calendar days the first year after the effective date, 225 days in year 2 and 180 days in the third year.
3. it mandates a minimum of 1400 inadmissible aliens be processed each day.
4. 1-3 place restrictions on what the president can do now, it does not help the president.
5. Authorizes an additional 16,000 detention beds that are not full today. The problem is not detention beds but the president swill to detain them.
6. Authorizes $1.4B to communities struggling to handle the immigrants. Sanctuary cities should pay for it themselves, they said they would. It would provide public funding for illegal aliens. Why is that a good idea?
Biden and Harris can secure the border today without this legislation, Trump did it without this legislation. And so I will still complain about the non action by Biden and Harris on the border. It has been completely their debacle.
The vice president is expected to focus on both curbing the current flow of migrants and coordinating with countries in the region to address the root causes of migration.
www.nbcnews.com
A senior administration official said Harris' role would focus on "two tracks": both curbing the current flow of migrants and implementing a long-term strategy that addresses the root causes of migration.
Has she done either of these things? No.