outhouse
Atheistically
and some people avoid known history, and flat refuse common knowledge
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Where did Cain obtain his food and wife?
- Thread starter Sweetvoice
- Start date
and some people avoid known history, and flat refuse common knowledge
sincerly
Well-Known Member
True, the history of the source of all things was recorded in the Bible.
Many are flat refusing the common knowledge of Adam having unnamed daughters and that the earth being covered with vegetation and animals.(But, no other human beings.)
outhouse
Atheistically
mythology is not history
even by the bibles account, this was written thousands of years after the fact. It has no credibility or accuracy concerning historicity of any event regarding the OP.
the people who wrote it even state its allegory and not a literal account of history.
that is not common kowledge.
it is fantasy and illusion based on historical ignorance on your part
hebrews/jews/israelites did not exist prior to 1200 BC, they were Canaanites prior to that time period. NOW this is a fact.
you cannot refute it in any way shape or form no matter how hard you try, because you cannot change reality.
Last edited:
Thief
Rogue Theologian
Common knowledge?
So God and Man have never met?
Dismissing scripture as myth leads to such declaration.
The Garden event happened.
Some people just refuse to believe.
BSM1
What? Me worry?
Exactly. Thank You
outhouse
Atheistically
absolutely not
go read the definition of mythology wait ill do it since you wont
Mythology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
] Myths typically involve supernatural characters and are endorsed by rulers or priests. They may arise as overelaborated accounts of historical events, as allegory for or personification of natural phenomena, or as an explanation of ritual. They are transmitted to convey religious or idealized experience, to establish behavioral models, and to teach.
you dont have to believe them, or swallow it hook line and sinker, since its not literal!
its allegory ment to be used as a tool to teach and make people better, by following a literal rule you ruin the mans work
Not according to history, science, scholars, and the people who wrote the words [facepalm]
waitasec
Veteran Member
in other words, his quest for truth found in objective evidence is noted
javajo
Well-Known Member
I find it interesting that Jesus' genealogy is traced all the way back to Adam in Luke 3, and there were only 9 generations from Abraham to Noah and from Noah to Adam. Everyone (Jews) had genealogies traced back to Abraham and he is an historic figure. So it is not difficult to believe Adam was real, after all, Jesus who was impeccable in character spoke of both Adam and Noah.
outhouse
Atheistically
if you rely on absense of evidence to live by, thats fine. but that doesnt mean your NOT refusing known knowledge.
I choose knowledge
there is NOTHING AT ALL in reality that shows this to be true.
outhouse
Atheistically
all false
the genealogies are traced back with men who are claimed to have lived 900+ years
and according to scholars mythicalscholarships know for a fact that much of this was a literary creation, and it carries no HISTORICITY AT ALL.
Abraham has ZERO historicity and by scholarships is known to exist only in literature. [mythology]
that goes for adam as well that is known Mesopotamian mythology
javajo
Well-Known Member
Ok, but I believe itall false
the genealogies are traced back with men who are claimed to have lived 900+ years
scholarships know for a fact that much of this was a literary creation, and it carries no HISTORICITY AT ALL.
Abraham has ZERO historicity and by scholarships is known to exist only in literature. [mythology]
that goes for adam as well that is known Mesopotamian mythology
sincerly
Well-Known Member
According to the "Talk" examination section of the "editors" in discussing what can be posted in wikipedia "MYTH" is a "symbolic narrative". There is still debate raging among them. Anything which is "original material" is labeled such----Therefore, since the Bible was all "Original material", it was classified as "myth".
Now for "Reality" notice the areas which need to be hammered out:
Contents
1 Pending changes
- 2 Quantum mechanics again:
- 3 The Axiom axiom?
- 4 What reality might not be
- 5 Definition
- 6 This article should be self-referencing Wikipedia!
- 7 Truth
- 8 Why is Quantum Mechanics Included?
- 9 Why is the page being vandalised ?
- 10 Edit request from Reyobem, 3 March 2011
- 11 REFERENCES ON REALITY
- 12 Sources
- 13 Kuhn
- 14 Lead first and second sentence; time and space section
- 15 Proposal re WP:Synth, Lead, topics, and article evolution
- 16 Buddhist and Hindu conceptions
- 17 Nothingness
- 18 More reification content is needed
- 19 Realism section is needed
- 20 Native American conceptions
- 21 Dreamtime section needed
- 22 Fresh start needed
- 23 See also section
- 24 Edit request from Krakajakmak, 1 August 2011
- 25 Ken Wilbers AQAL theory
- 26 Fresh start needed
- 27 Typo
- 28 Truth vs. Fact §
- 29 Edit request from , 20 November 2011
- 30 Edit request on 10 December 2011
- 31 Edit request on 17 December 2011
- 32 Levels of reality
- 33 (Subjectivity and mysticism) Walmarks OR Amputation
- 34 Edit Request
Outhouse, Each person has a choice to make---drinking the "kool-aid" of those with "theory--but no verification" or The "Living Water" from The "Witnessed and recorded "examples" which were given for our admonition and learning"---(1Cor.10:6, 11)
You mean those people who are propagating the falseness that the BIBLE is a "myth"??? AND rejected the Messiah ---Jesus---when HE came the first time???