“God, being ineffable, needs a mediator to receive and translate what God communicates into something humans can understand, so God chooses certain individuals who have a dual nature, human and divine, to receive His communication.”
There is absolutely NO reason why a God is in need of a "mediator" simply because God is ineffable. IOW, humans are incapable of comprehending God from OUR limited perception.....however, God is NOT limited and COULD communicate with each and every human being, singularly, or as a group. There is absolutely NOTHING preventing such a God from doing that.
[QUOTE="Trailblazer, post: 6089061, member: 63455] "God is preventing Himself from doing that, because He does not WANT TO….. and God only does what God WANTS TO DO. [/QUOTE]
That's classic! God is perfectly CAPABLE of communicating with people, one on one, but has chosen NOT to; I guess in order to 'accommodate'
your notion of , there needing to be a "messenger" to do that FOR God.
[QUOTE="Trailblazer, post: 6089061, member: 63455]God is NEVER going to communicate directly to everyone because it is unnecessary and nobody could understand an ineffable God except a Messenger so it would fall on deaf ears…[/QUOTE]
And why IS that?.....is God speaking in some kind of foreign language that only GOD knows, and we need a "messenger" to TRANSLATE that to us?
Do you have ANY idea just how SILLY that sounds?
[QUOTE="Trailblazer, post: 6089061, member: 63455]But besides that fact, God does not want to make belief that easy, God wants our faith.[/QUOTE]
Ahhhh yes, the FAITH card comes out now. That, besides God apparently being a 'butt' about this matter of people believing in (Him).
"Let's make it tough for these silly Humans to believe, just for the "hell" (pun intended) of it...buwahahahaha <evil God laugh>
[QUOTE="Trailblazer, post: 6089061, member: 63455]I guess you had better go back and read your Bible.[/QUOTE]
No thanks, once was enough for me, reading that crazy book.
[QUOTE="Trailblazer, post: 6089061, member: 63455]God separates the wheat from the chaff… Those who have faith are the wheat and the chaff will fall by the wayside in their own arrogance, expecting an Almighty God to hop to and deliver their order… I am sorry you cannot understand how arrogant that is…[/QUOTE]
I might not 'understand' how arrogant it is....but I do know how ignorant it is to be believing such nonsense about this otherwise INEFFABLE God.
[QUOTE="Trailblazer, post: 6089061, member: 63455]Why not just go back to BUE and join Dotsman?[/QUOTE]
And do what? Mr Dotsman seems to be quite capable of handling himself...he surely is not in need of anything I might have to offer.
[QUOTE="Trailblazer, post: 6089061, member: 63455]all the Abrahamic religious believers have Messengers who established their religions, why pick on Baha’is?[/QUOTE]
Bahais say humans NEED a mediator, because without one, nobody would be able to "understand" what God is saying.......which is NOT necessarily true,
[QUOTE="Trailblazer, post: 6089061, member: 63455]What evidence do you have that it isn’t true? If it was true, then why doesn’t God communicate directly to humans? You got an answer to that?[/QUOTE]
There are a myriad of things that this God doesn't "do", which I have no answers for. God, in MY playbook, is ineffable.
However to respond to your question.....one cannot go very far without encountering SOMEONE who is declaring that GOD "told them something"...."just now, last night, yesterday, a week from last Tuesday".....God SPOKE to them, COMMUNICATED with them...and they UNDERSTOOD IT!
Are you going to go on record here and now and declare that all those people were LYING and MADE IT ALL UP?
[QUOTE="Trailblazer, post: 6089061, member: 63455]But the most important thing is that you can give me no logical reason why God would not use Messengers; you just don’t LIKE the idea, but God is not going to change His time honored method of communication because you and a few atheists don’t like it. An Omnipotent God does not take orders from humans.[/QUOTE]
The only LOGICAL reason I can give you, is that I do not believe that an OMNIPOTENT God, necessarily NEEDS someone to be 'relaying' (His) messages to people.....even YOU admit that God is more than CAPABLE of communicating to one, or a group, of people........just that (according to you), God doesn't WANT to.
[QUOTE="Trailblazer, post: 6089061, member: 63455]all the Abrahamic religious believers have Messengers who established their religions, why pick on Baha’is?[/QUOTE]
Well, for nothing other than for reasons known only to Bahais, they have taken it upon themselves to refer to biblical "prophets" as "messengers".
And NONE of those "prophets" necessarily did any such thing as "established their religions". About ALL they did, was predict things...some of which came to fruition, some didn't.
The believed that they were doing the bidding of their God.....all the while never fully explaining why such a God actually NEEDED their "assistance". Sounds very 'suspect' if you ask me.
[QUOTE="Trailblazer, post: 6089061, member: 63455]What is demeaning about God using Messengers to communicate? Answer the question, and I want a logical answer.[/QUOTE]
It is demeaning to an omnipotent God, one believed to have literally THOUGHT the entire universe into being, would have to 'stoop' to the level of mentality of human beings, just to get a few words in edgewise, inbetween all the cacophony from all these human beings all talking at once about how GREAT and WONDERFUL and POWERFUL their God IS.....and then say God cannot, will not, or simply doesn't FEEL like saying what needs to be said, without going through some self-appointed mediator.
It IS demeaning to such a God! I would even go do far as to suggest that it is INSULTING to such a God.
[QUOTE="Trailblazer, post: 6089061, member: 63455]You are completely ILLOGICAL. If there was a
better way, an All-Knowing and All-Wise God would have used that way, and we all know he hasn’t….[/QUOTE]
Which says to me, one of the following must be true....
1)God is NOT all-knowing or all-wise.
2)There is no such God.
3)It is purely a Bahai invention framed around the biblical notion that Jesus really DID say that no one can talk to God without going through himself.
And then the very same people who claim that Jesus said that, turn right around and declare that not only is GOD "god", but Jesus is "god" TOO. < rolls eyes now>
[QUOTE="Trailblazer, post: 6089061, member: 63455]What you are saying is that you know more than God about how to communicate, which is logically impossible since you cannot be MORE than All-Knowing.[/QUOTE]
A completely irrational statement, born out of Bahai way of thinking, in order to justify their belief and need for a "messenger".
[QUOTE="Trailblazer, post: 6089061, member: 63455]YOU do not MAKE the rules, God does. I suggest you get over it because you cannot MAKE an Omnipotent God do what you think He should.
[/QUOTE]
There is something really seriously wrong with your line of reasoning here, but there would be no point in bringing it up, as you would simply deny it, and then come back with something else from your playbook of appropriate responses.
[QUOTE="Trailblazer, post: 6089061, member: 63455]And if you do not LIKE what God does, take it up with God, not with me... I do not make the rules. [/QUOTE]
I'll take that under consideration, the next time I find nothing to watch on NetFlix.