Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Really good illustration on how people view the same term differently by which the answers become so varied and diverse.The thread is working with bizarre defs.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Really good illustration on how people view the same term differently by which the answers become so varied and diverse.The thread is working with bizarre defs.
Since the question assumes evolution the answer is simple: the senses, they have selective advantage without consciousness.
Because there is a selective advantage for them to work in harmony. Organisms where the senses do not works in harmoniously with the consciousness will be selected against, they will die out without passing on their genes.. Organisms where the senses work more harmoniously with consciousness will be selected for and they will pass on their genes in greater number. This is evolution 101.And how consciousness evolved to interact with the senses and both work in harmony?
Because there is a selective advantage for them to work in harmony. Organisms where the senses do not works in harmoniously with the consciousness will be selected against, they will die out without passing on their genes.. Organisms where the senses work more harmoniously with consciousness will be selected for and they will pass on their genes in greater number. This is evolution 101.
And don't think that our senses work in perfect harmony with our consciousness. Our consciousness sometimes causes us to misinterpret the input we get from our sensory organs. But they are harmonious enough and in a way that has allowed us to survive. But people die everyday because their senses were not in harmony with their consciousness.
We are not talking about human babies, we are talking about how senses and consciousness evolved in the first place. We are talking about microscopic single celled organisms, and then following the evolutionary process from there.Why the born baby aren't conscious? why consciousness develop later on?
IOW we born with the senses but consciousness isn't.
We are not talking about human babies, we are talking about how senses and consciousness evolved in the first place. We are talking about microscopic single celled organisms, and then following the evolutionary process from there.
So your answer to the question would be the same as mine. Senses came before consciousness.I mentioned human babies as an example for the fact that they're born not aware of the surrounding.
Everybody is so serious on these threads. I'm sure you will all be able to answer all the questions of the universe before you're done.....good luck!So your answer to the question would be the same as mine. Senses came before consciousness.
Hey, don't try your sarcasm on me bub. I am the king of sarcasm.Everybody is so serious on these threads. I'm sure you will all be able to answer all the questions of the universe before you're done.....good luck!
So your answer to the question would be the same as mine. Senses came before consciousness.
Hair developed and not evolved on a baby's head, it develops later later on.No it isn't the same, consciousness developed and not evolved, consciousness doesn't evolve in a baby human but it develops later on.
Senses without consciousness have great value.Senses without consciousness has no value, similarly consciousness without senses has no value.
How senses and consciousness evolved simultaneously, was it due to plan or just happened by chance?
Senses without consciousness has great value.
Hair developed and not evolved on a baby's head, it develops later later on.
There is some truth to that, unconscious humans have little need for most of their senses.Not for humans.
But comparable enough to put the lie to your construct.Not the head but the groin area, but still incomparable to senses and consciousness.
But comparable enough to put the lie to your construct.
There is some truth to that, unconscious humans have little need for most of their senses.
yes
yes
no its been examined and I am not throwing assumptions.