• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Who Believe the Earth is 6000 Years Old???

XAAX

Active Member
FFH said:
I'm amazed that so many LDS don't even understand or accept the 13,000 year old earth teaching. It is completely and Biblically accurate....

I guess most LDS think Adam just hung out in the garden of eden for a month or so, that being what let's see....30,000 years....

We need to look at the pattern set forth by God in scripture and then we can realize creation and the fall of Adam was no longer than 7,000 years and then began the beginning of another 7,000 years, we being in the beginning of the 6,000th year when Christ will rule and reign for the final 1,000 years...

Many think Christ has delayed his coming because we are well into the 6,000th year, and that very well may be and I need to look at the Jewish calendar again to see what year we may actually be in.

Are we really in the year 6,007 or how far off is our Gregorian calendar...some say up to 7 years off and other say possibly even more than that...

No offense FFH, I just read through the website posted earlier. Once again, it is full of misleading information. The only people that I know of who would by this stuff is maybe someone who has had no interaction with the outside world. I mean you would have to be completely ignorant to almost every type of science. I have heard some ridiculous things on here from different religions (no names mentioned..:D), but that takes the cake. What do you need to join this organization, a lobotomy? Sorry if I am coming across as rude, but this is just so ridiculous I almost think it has to be a joke. What do you think of fossils, carbon dating, astronomy, anything??? Is every other piece of evidence that has ever been discovered some satanistic plot to mislead us?? Please tell me...
 

FFH

Veteran Member
Kcnorwood said:
The bible ONLY speaks of a levathen
The word leviathan has become synonymous with any large aquatic monster or creature. In Modren Hewbrew it simply means "whale.
NOT dinosours get it right.
According to the account given by Job this creature had scales, nostrils and a neck.

Never seen a whale with scales, nostrils or a neck, let alone a fire breathing one...(insert fire breathing smiley here). :rainbow1: ;)

A seal would fit this description more closely than a whale, and even then there are no scales and the size is all wrong of course...:rolleyes:

The Hebrew translation is as close to anything we have of similar size, but is not anything like what Job described...
 

FFH

Veteran Member
beckysoup61 said:

If we can back this up by doctrine, most of us would be hapy to accept it.
And really there is no "LDS doctrine" to back this up just our own study of the scriptures and prayer.

We never really get into anything too deep in church, this is why we all spend so much time at Deseret Book, we all want to know more than is taught in the small amount of time spent at church....It is just designed to teach us the basics, not any of this stuff we have discussed in detail....

The doctrine is there we just have to study it out for ourselves in more detail than we are limited to in the few hours spent at church.

Like you said we are not all robots but can search the truth of all things out for ourselves, since we are only taught basic doctrine at church, no time for anything else.
 

s2a

Heretic and part-time (skinny) Santa impersonator
FFH said:
Einstein spent many hours studying the Torah in Hebrew and claimed the formula for E=mc2 is in there....

Please cite credible references in direct support of this claim.

I have read Einstein's [FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"Relativity: The Special and General Theory", and (incredibly enough!) there is no mention of the Torah as either inspiration, foundation, or mathematical source of his proposed theorem. NONE.

I declare your assertion as complete and utter bunk, predicate upon your presentation of clear and readily accesible documentation to the contrary.

BUNK.


[/FONT]
 

s2a

Heretic and part-time (skinny) Santa impersonator
FFH said:
And really there is no "LDS doctrine" to back this up just our own study of the scriptures and prayer.

We never really get into anything too deep in church, this is why we all spend so much time at Deseret Book, we all want to know more than is taught in the small amount of time spent at church....It is just designed to teach us the basics, not any of this stuff we have discussed in detail....

The doctrine is there we just have to study it out for ourselves in more detail than we are limited to in the few hours spent at church.

Like you said we are not all robots but can search the truth of all things out for ourselves, since we are only taught basic doctrine at church, no time for anything else.

Wow.

This is the very first concession by means of excuse I've ever encountered to argue that, in essence, "My religious faith is too busy to bother with details in defining it's own beliefs."

From this...'truth" is declared...
 

FFH

Veteran Member
s2a said:
Please cite credible references in direct support of this claim.

I have read Einstein's [FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"Relativity: The Special and General Theory", and (incredibly enough!) there is no mention of the Torah as either inspiration, foundation, or mathematical source of his proposed theorem. NONE.

I declare your assertion as complete and utter bunk, predicate upon your presentation of clear and readily accesible documentation to the contrary.

BUNK.


[/FONT]
www.chabad.org

"Torah does not talk in terms of matter as a self-contained substance, but as an event, a 'word'. Today we understand matter as simply a dynamic of concentrated energy, as in the familiar formula E=mc2. Or, in physicist David Bohm's definition, "That which unfolds, whatever the medium".

From this page: http://www.chabad.org/library/article.asp?AID=71692

Okay here is the explanation as to where Einstein found the E=mc2 formula.

9267da3ebc90055c4529846d499e3a41.png


Genesis 1:16

16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the small light to rule the night; he made the stars also.

The Hebrew translation for greater light is "hama'or hagadol" (literally, the light the great)

ma'or (mem alef vav resh) is sometimes translated as sun but it is literally light or luminary.

ma (mem alef) is mass

or (vav resh) means light or fire

subtract 1, and ma'or becomes ma'har or mee'her
(vav -1 = hey)

mee-her is speed

then he applied the old Hebrew rule that says letters of the same sound are equal to each other, he reversed the word.....

rum equals "raised"

Finally, he substituted letters of the same sound

re-ba equals squared

obtaining mass times the speed of light, raised to the square for the meaning of ma'or.

This is the claim as given by Yacov Rambsel in his book The Genesis Factor

Don't have a direct web link to this of course, because it's in this book, but if I find a good link from an internet book seller, which sometimes one can search the pages of books and get a paragraph or two as a sampler, I'll post a link to his claim that Einstein found the formula for E=mc2 in Genesis 1: 16.
 

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
XAAX said:
OH No, not again...lol...this is not a mormon belief?? If not, why would one mormon believe this and not another??
When a religion -- any religion -- fails to take an official stance on a subject that is outside the realm of theology, as is the question of the age of the Earth -- its members are free to decide for themselves what they believe. For every Latter-day Saint who believe as FFH does about the age of the Earth, you will find hundreds or perhaps thousands who believe that the Earth is billions of years old. It's a huge mistake to assume that all Mormons think alike on issues that have nothing to do with their religion. We don't even all root for the same football team, for Heavens sake!
 

XAAX

Active Member
Katzpur said:
When a religion -- any religion -- fails to take an official stance on a subject that is outside the realm of theology, as is the question of the age of the Earth -- its members are free to decide for themselves what they believe. For every Latter-day Saint who believe as FFH does about the age of the Earth, you will find hundreds or perhaps thousands who believe that the Earth is billions of years old. It's a huge mistake to assume that all Mormons think alike on issues that have nothing to do with their religion. We don't even all root for the same football team, for Heavens sake!

Oh, I know Kat...I was under the impression for a moment that it was part of the religion. I think it was Becky that cleared it up. I can see as why the church wouldn't take a stance on this, it kinda falls into the realm of common sense, or lack there of...lol...
 

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
FFH said:
I'm amazed that so many LDS don't even understand or accept the 13,000 year old earth teaching. It is completely and Biblically accurate....
I can't speak for all of us, FFH, but I look to the Bible for spiritual guidance, not as a math, English, geography or science textbook. God gave us brains, and scientists are using theirs to discover some incredible things about our universe. I'm at a loss as to why you are so insistent upon dismissing their findings.
 

FFH

Veteran Member
s2a said:
Unawarded apostate
I award you the most intelligent athiest debator on RF. There is none better than s2a.

How is it that the mods have overlooked your vast wealth of knowledge and understanding of the human psychi.....

Thanks s2a for cutting through all the garbage and getting to the heart of the matter with your unique insight into Christian culture....

Your posts cut me through to the core, but I'm still not budging...;)

Would it surprise you to know that Jesus Christ actually created this world by the direction of the Father according to revelation given to Joseph Smith and recorded here in The Book of Moses, which is just Genesis 1- 13 restored.

And would it also surprise you to realize that there was/were more than one God/persons involved with creation. Adam and many of us had a say and a hand in how the earth appeared and was created...

See: The Book of Abraham
 

FFH

Veteran Member
Katzpur said:
I can't speak for all of us, FFH, but I look to the Bible for spiritual guidance, not as a math, English, geography or science textbook. God gave us brains, and scientists are using theirs to discover some incredible things about our universe. I'm at a loss as to why you are so insistent upon dismissing their findings.
Of course we have our own minds and can think for ourselves and God encourages us to do so.

All intelligence/truth ultimately originates from God...

We are not to glory or take credit for anything we have accomplished, for God gives us our very breath and he expects us to acknowledge him in all things...

To take credit for inventions we think we have come up with, or any scientific or mathematical discoveries, is to deny that God exists or is the source of these discoveries/intelligence/truth, which originates from God who allows us to discover these truths.

Satan is in the business of blocking all truth from entering our brains at all cost. Even to the destruction of the individual....

Satan can and does motivate people to perpetuate scientific lies, because he knows that the majority of the population is ignorant of scientific methods/studies not to mention advanced mathematical calculations and so we buy into the lies these so-called experts in their fields feed us, because we assume they are telling the truth about what they've discovered, when in actuality they are just theories passed off as solid scientific discoveries.....

Scientific THEORIES not truth...
 

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
FFH said:
Of course we have our own minds and can think for ourselves and God encourages us to do so.

All intelligence/truth ultimately originates from God...

We are not to glory or take credit for anything we have accomplished, for God gives us our very breath and he expects us to acknowledge him in all things...

To take credit for inventions we think we have come up with, or any scientific or mathematical discoveries, is to deny that God exists or is the source of these discoveries/intelligence/truth, which originates from God who allows us to discover these truths.
Uh... Did I say something to prompt this?

Satan is in the business of blocking all truth from entering our brains at all cost. Even to the destruction of the individual....

Satan can and does motivate people to perpetuate scientific lies, because he knows that the majority of the population is ignorant of scientific methods/studies not to mention advanced mathematical calculations and so we buy into the lies these so-called experts in their fields feed us, because we assume they are telling the truth about what they've discovered, when in actuality they are just theories passed off as solid scientific discoveries.....

Scientific THEORIES not truth...
Well, I guess that's where we differ. I see scientists as being as truthful as anybody else. It sounds to me like you think they're the enemy.

I'll tell you something else that bothers me about your point of view. I get the feeling that, for some reason, you'd find the creation to be less of a miracle if it took place over several billion years than if it look place over 6000 years. Could you explain why that is?
 

FFH

Veteran Member
Well, I guess that's where we differ. I see scientists as being as truthful as anybody else. It sounds to me like you think they're the enemy.
Scientists are not the enemy until they try to pass of scientific theories as fact. Darwin towards the end of his life or on his death bed said that he never intended his theories of evolution to be taught as fact and readily acknowledged that they were just that, THEORIES. I think he also had acknowledged he had a little to do with his theories being taught as fact, but later tried to clear that up by stating again that these were only theories not scientific facts....

Sometimes we are also guilty of taking scientific theories and passing them off as facts. I see this being done in high school classrooms and college lectures.... We turn a theory into fact by simply leaving out a few details of the original scientific discoveries.

Sometimes the facts get distorted over time also, the same way a person telling a story to another gets the facts mixed up when trying to retell the original story and then another tries to tell the story based on a regurgitated version of the original until the original story gets so distorted it doesn't even sound like or resemble the original...

I'll tell you something else that bothers me about your point of view. I get the feeling that, for some reason, you'd find the creation to be less of a miracle if it took place over several billion years than if it look place over 6000 years. Could you explain why that is?
Not less of a miracle, but less likely, and Adam could have hung out in the Garden for.... (let's do the calculations: let's just say Adam hung out for 10 million earth years in the Garden, after the earth was created in 6 days/6,000 years, in including the day/1,000 years God rested, divided by 1,000 earth years to get heaven's timetable, which would give us 10,000 days as measured by heaven, divided by 365 days, which equals 27 years.

So in other words Adam and Eve waited 27 years to partake of the forbidden fruit.

Well at least they had a few good years in paradise before they had to leave that place...;)

Now I don't feel so bad for them...

But if what I have said in the past is true, the earth being only 13,00o years old, then Adam and Eve would've eaten the forbidden fruit on the day that God rested, the 7th millennium of the earth's existence, the time period from 6,000 to 7,000 in earth years.

They could have waited a day or two or a month or two or even a year or two or more, we don't know, but it seems like the pattern just would not fit, because there is nothing to back up Adam and Eve spending more than a day in the Garden....

Just my thoughts....and there are others who would agree with me on this...

just think about it and tell me if more than a day passed before Adam partook of the fruit....and we have to remember this was a long day, a thousand years in our time.....

Adam and Eve had a long time to think things over, wouldn't you agree, or was that thousand years like a day to them too ???

I think it was like a day to them also, but a lot can be accomplish/experienced in this time frame/heavens timetable...

From what I've heard from people who have died and experienced heaven and come back to tell about it they say that the time frame is so different there that 2 minutes being dead was like hours in that heavenly existence, just the opposite, but more was accomplished in those few hours than could be accomplished/learned in the same time frame on earth. So a day in the presences of God, like Adam and Eve experienced was a 1,000 years of experience on earth. Much more is learned/experienced in a day in heaven than could be experienced in a 1,000 years on earth...

How long would it take to get bored of the other fruits of the Garden, which would make you want to try a supposedly more tasty forbidden treat ??? ;)

That's the real question, then we can start talking in terms of days, months or years, which would equate to thousands (days/months in heavens timetable) and millions (years in heaven's timetable) of earth years...

If 27 years in heaven equals 10 million years on earth then 2,700 years in heaven would equal 1 billion years on earth...

Did Adam and Eve wait 2,700 years in paradise before eating the forbidden fruit or even 27 years ??? or just a day like the Bible seems to suggest, which would keep the time frame in the thousands of years not millions....

Even if they waited a month or two before eating the fruit that would still put the earth's age under 100,000 years...

The earth is nowhere near even that old.

Our top soil on the earth is only inches thick not even feet thick. Farmers have a horrible time trying to keep things growing on their lands. The soil must be rested or the land rotated at least every 7 years for things to continue to grow... Remember the horrible dust storms which wiped out so many farmers earlier in the last century ???? The topsoil literally blew away and they were forced off their farms in search of another way to make a living...

How is that possible after so many millions or billions of years that there is not more topsoil than we now have ???
</IMG></IMG>
 

Rough_ER

Member
FFH said:
Scientists are not the enemy until they try to pass of scientific theories as fact. Darwin towards the end of his life or on his death bed said that he never intended his theories of evolution to be taught as fact and readily acknowledged that they were just that, THEORIES. I think he acknowledged he had a little to do with his theories being taught as fact, but later tried to clear that up by stating again that these were only theories not scientific facts....

:banghead3
 

FFH

Veteran Member
Rough_ER said:
:banghead3
The truth hurts... I know...... maybe even worse than banging your head against the wall...at least you didn't poke me in the eye, like Comprehend does and a I appreciate that... :slap:
 

FFH

Veteran Member
Rough_ER said:
Give me your definition of theory please.
A suggestion that something might be true, but has not been proven as such, because of various missing links in information gathered, which would complete the "equation".
 

Rough_ER

Member
Then please tell me what theory you have which is supported by more evidence than evolution. By your critique I assume you do have a more convincing theory to offer... :)
 
Top