Nanda
Polyanna
To be enlightened means to be "awakened." To be free from delusion.
If that's the criteria, then I'm not sure that anyone is.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
To be enlightened means to be "awakened." To be free from delusion.
Spirituality and a path to creator should never be for sale.
Most people have jobs... even the enlightened I'm sure don't mind a little hard work. In fact for many hard work is part of the path to enlightenment.
I'm also sure that the truly enlightened would be happy to just know they have helped another on the path.
wa:do
That's an interesting comment. Most people would say Jesus was enlightened, but he was probably one of the most blatent when saying he "was the way, the truth, and the light" etc. So my question is this: If people say they are enlightened, does that mean they aren't, or if they say they aren't enlightened, does that mean they are? I'm not really sure who I think is enlightened. I guess I say that because we are all enlightened in our own unique ways. Pieces of the complete puzzle kinda. Maybe it takes all of us collectively to represent enlightenment. Hmmm, just thinking out loud .....Anyone who says they know the way I can know my 'true self' has something to sell...
wa:do
Spirituality and a path to creator should never be for sale.....
Greetings. Whether to charge or not is an interesting question. Surely an Enlightened one will not need any reward, monetary or emotional, but would work towards illumination of others. On the other hand as ranjana posts, one has to eat. Perhaps the future will see a mixture of approaches. Hopefully, those that receive money either donated or sales will use that money to spirit their efforts.maybe but arent they human? shouldnt they have an income? the rest of us have jobs, (mostly) and expect to be paid as teachers, or whatever our title may be.
is the teacher supposed to live off of light? or get a 'regular job' like the rest of us, and take away precious time from their purpose to illuminate?
Is enlightenment restricted to Religious persons?
This may be strange but for a non-religious person i'd have to say Karl Marx. His vision was amazing. He had an "awakening." I do not believe in communism but i think his work was well before its time.
Possibly Tony Blair
I will readily grant that I am guessing with little information, but no, I am not joking.
Actually, I am basically going by Ken Wilber's word, as well as by a hint of good judgement in the way he renounced his power a while ago.
I may easily be wrong, however, perhaps very wrong.
This man followed a complete *** into Iraq...
Greetings Darkendless. From my view enlightenment is not restricted to religious persons and is available for anyone, and more available today than ever before. However, although not necessarily religious before enlightenment, an enlightened one will likely be his/her own religion.Is enlightenment restricted to Religious persons?....
Yes, it is a god-given right.all im saying is why should this knowledge be for free and those who are selflessly devoted to bringing this knowledge into people's awareness should receive nothing for their work? again, what else do you propose we exchange? nothing? youre saying its our god-given right to be taught the nature of our true being?