Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
loverOfTruth;2835306]
WHY? What has changed about your god? If you visualise your god, does the visualisation magically become your god? Surely such behaviour would have absolutely no effect on your god.loveroftruth said:If you create a picture or idol of God, none of those attributes hold true anymore.
So which is the Creator?
God. Creation is specifically connected with Christ who is the Logos. The Godhead or Urgrund would be simmilar to the Nirguna Brahman someone mentioned above. It's preexistential and beyond being as we know it.
the one attribute about god that i can see is...
indifference.
Quite the opposite
God is not indifferent to His creation, as one of His attributes is The Ever-Living
To give an idea of how much He cares for us, you may wish to read this Hadith Qudsi:
“If my servant comes closer to Me a hand span, I come closer to him or her an arms-length; and if he or she comes to Me walking, I come to him or her at speed.”
(Al-Bukhari)
moot.
now look at syria...
edit:
consider tsunamis, hurricanes, drought
and earthquakes for starters...or maybe elizabeth friztl...as god just stands there and watches.
indifference is what can be determined through observation from my eyes.
Drawing something creates a symbol. The statement that God can never be created or destroyed is not affected by an artist's depiction of Him.
According to my religion, God is both formless and possessing form. The scriptures provide some descriptions as to the qualities and characteristics of this form.
According to my religion and ability to use logical thinking, one whose intention is to think of God will therefore be thinking of God. Having an inaccurate image in ones mind does not change the fact that you are thinking of God. Just like if you tell me what you look like but I have never actually seen you, it is still you that I am thinking of despite having an inaccurate image in my mind.
The very fact that you worship God reduces God to a physical object. There is no harm in beginning this way. But if we are to progress and discover the truth that God is not limited, we have to discover there is no subject-object separation that we are not separate from God. Till we achieve this, we are idol worshippers. When we discover we are not separate from God, worship becomes redundant a possibility not envisaged in Islam but is the very goal of Hinduism.
Worship is required only if God is separate from the worshipper. When the worshipper realises God is not separate from him, then worship becomes superfluous.
How so?The very fact that you worship God reduces God to a physical object.
fishy said:Quote:
Originally Posted by loveroftruth
If you create a picture or idol of God, none of those attributes hold true anymore.
WHY? What has changed about your god? If you visualise your god, does the visualisation magically become your god? Surely such behaviour would have absolutely no effect on your god.
Is your God infinite?
But then you do believe that one of the attributes of God is more close to the humans like 'having a child - son or daughter', right ? That kind of restricts the greatness of God, don't you think ? To me, He is nothing like His creation.
And why would God all of a sudden need to come up with a Son where as He had been sending Messengers/Prophets from the beginning of mankind ?
Who set the PRICE?i've never understood this line of reasoning.
God does not reproduce offspring in the way we do, but that does not mean he cannot have children. If he creates an intelligent being, lets say an angel, that angel is said to be his Son in the scriptures. All angels are called 'sons of God' just as all mankind are called Gods children.
So when we say that Jesus is Gods Son, it doesnt mean that God reproduced Jesus in the way a man and woman would reproduce a child. It simply means that Jehovah God created Jesus and the close bond they have is similar to that of a father and his son. Its just a 'figure of speech'...it doesnt mean he has a humanlike reproductive system. He is not a 'reproducer' he is a 'creator'....he creates life and he is the father of all living things.
because those messengers were usually imperfect humans who eventually died due be being born sinners. The messengers of the past could not save mankind...they could only reveal Gods intentions to save mankind. Even Mohammad spoke of Gods intention to save mankind, yes?
Divine justice required a perfect human life to save mankind...and no prophet or messenger was perfect. So God sent one of his holy angels, his most beloved angel, to earth to be born through a woman and thus be 'fully' human.
The one he sent into the world was Jesus. Born perfect, Jesus life was the equivalent of the life that Adam lost....perfect. So only he could rightly offer to God the price of redemption on behalf of all mankind.