• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Who made God?

St Giordano Bruno

Well-Known Member
I am must more at ease with a universe that created itself and complexity emerges necessarily as matter self organizes through one of its numerous phase transitions, like for instance water crystallizing into complex ice lattices as it freezes as opposed to a complex God responsible for such complexity. You see complexity is quite capable of emerging through its own inherent self organization such as phase transitions rather than an external intelligent designer which of course creates a paradox as to where that complexity came from.
 

Adonis65

Active Member
Isn't 'Creator' singular?

It sure is. But Isn't 'Father' singular as well? If someone is a father but his father is also a father, wouldn't that make his father the father?

Stop thinking one dimensionally. There's more out there than you know.
 

PolyHedral

Superabacus Mystic
It sure is. But Isn't 'Father' singular as well? If someone is a father but his father is also a father, wouldn't that make his father the father?

Stop thinking one dimensionally. There's more out there than you know.
Well, yes, father is a singular. Any given person has only one direct father, after all.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Isn't 'Creator' singular? If someone created the Creator then that someone would be the Creator instead of the Creator being the Creator.
It seems to me that this implies that if the theists can't resolve the question of how God can exist uncaused, then there remains a possibility that God is a false god.
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
It seems to me that this implies that if the theists can't resolve the question of how God can exist uncaused, then there remains a possibility that God is a false god.
If we can't resolve how the universe is here uncaused we must not exist. :p
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
It seems to me that this implies that if the theists can't resolve the question of how God can exist uncaused, then there remains a possibility that God is a false god.

I can find no fault with what Jesus taught.
Jesus believed what was written in the Hebrew Scriptures [John 17v17]
such as Psalm [90v2] that says God is from everlasting to everlasting meaning always existed.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
I can find no fault with what Jesus taught.
Jesus believed what was written in the Hebrew Scriptures [John 17v17]
such as Psalm [90v2] that says God is from everlasting to everlasting meaning always existed.
That doesn't answer the question at all.

Simply saying "God always existed" is not an explanation for how it could be possible for God to have always existed.

And "Jesus believed _____" does not necessarily imply "_____ is true".

So... my point holds: until you actually demonstrate that what you claim is true - i.e. until you can demonstrate that "our Creator" cannot have a creator himself - there remains a possibility that your God, even if he exists, is a false god.
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
Except that there is loads of objective empirical evidence that we exist.
God...not so much.
We cannot be certain whether or not we have always existed. The only thing we know is that we have not always existed in this form. How any sort of god could be involved is a tough call when we don't know how existence itself came to be.
 

McBell

Unbound
We cannot be certain whether or not we have always existed.
Yet we not only can be certain we currently exist, but we can be certain that we have existed.
Unlike god.
Who can not even be demonstrated to ever exist beyond human concept.
 
Top