No, you tend to employ the Socratic method in various threads. Meaning, instead of proposing anything, you tend to state that other proposals are not absolutely verifiable, even if others haven't suggested that anything is absolutely verifiable.I have been asking you for quite some time to point out where i have said that living forever would be an enjoyable situation. This is all your misunderstanding, or misrepresentation of what i have said.
Considering how you have misrepresented me so far, i don't think that your opinion on how 'i seem' to have done something holds any value.
So you've defended the notion that 10 quadrillion years of video games may be worthwhile.
If you're not under the impression that living forever would be an enjoyable situation, then all of your posts to me have been irrelevant because my post was about how it would be unwise to agree to live forever without the option of ending it.
Because it only takes a few seconds for me to do so when it pops up in my user cp. You replied to me initially, and I've merely responded to your posts directed at me.So why do you keep replying to me?