gnomon
Well-Known Member
In last couple of election, many people voted for George W. Bush because he said he 'wouldn't' do this and that. Instead of voting for someone who 'won't' do anything, how about voting for someone who will do something. What do you think?
I'm voting for myself.
Honestly, only Ron Paul actually talks about what can be done in the confines of executive power while all the rest either knowingly talk about continuing the restriction of our liberties (Republicans) or offer us stupid little promises that are not the power of the executive to enact (Democrats).
Actually, what we need is someone who won't expand the drug war. Someone who won't interfere in foreign matters. Who won't continue down this raid putting even more Americans in prison. Who won't ruin local economies with over expansive health care or immigration plans.
The federal government has been doing too much for too long. Other than eliminating laws currently on the books I don't want officials promising to do anything.