Ultimately for anything to happen, it is Brahman's choice...Even if someone decided to come back.
I thought all that was explained before and made clear, several times, there is little to no comparison between Hindu beliefs and Revelation.
And so far most have been wrong, which is why we've moved into a debate section, as everyone is asserting opinions that don't necessarily match the text.
http://www.yoga-philosophy.com/eng/kalki/kalki.htm
There are numerous articles across the web showing the similarities between Revelations and Kalki.... Yet a quick list is:
- Both ride on the white horse to end the age of deception, by fighting against the iniquity with the words of his mouth.
- Both bring forth an age of enlightenment.
- After they've come the saints shall return, and shall remain on earth.
- Both come from Heaven.
- Both bring the end of the age.
- Both will reestablish righteous practise (dharma), and rule the earth.
- Both have a special name.
- etc...
No, not chosen, no one chooses Vishnu to take Avatara.
Vishnu chooses to come back.
Not correct, "following" anything is not specifically Dharmah, Dharmah is not religion, I think this is where your getting confused.
Oneness is the name of Heaven, Dharma is the Way...
So saying I'm wrong, as you've inserted your own misunderstanding of Oneness to only be limited to one aspect of Hinduism, when not everyone sees it like that, is silly.
It is Oneness in the beginning of creation, that unified the Heavens, the Dharma was the core of the beliefs that came from this.
But then to class some as Godly and Others as not according to their religion
If someone's religion says it is right to eat babies, and murder the innocent, that leads to bad karma; so therefore the religion can dictate someones Karma.
So Kalki never classes people according to their religion.
Kalki might have reasons that some religions might be adharmic...There might be logical reasons to do so, and prophesied throughout time it would happen.
It is not about "following Dharmah", but doing Dharmah Karma.
If people are walking (following) in a path of righteousness (dharma), then they will create good karma by their deeds....If they don't follow righteousness, they're likely to do bad deeds (adharma).
This is not the Hindu Idea of Brahman, the Hindu says that our essential nature is Brahman, That we are Brahman and we are Sat-Chit-Annand.
That is only one school of thought of Hinduism, some people believe in duality....Though Brahman is the source of all atman.
It is easier to understand like this, Brahman is the CPU manifesting the Matrix we see around us; our atman exists within the Matrix, thus without Brahman our atman wouldn't exist, yet not the other way around, Brahman doesn't need us to exist.
None is waiting for anyone.
Brahman is waiting for us all to evolve spiritually, as the whole meaning of life is for that reason....Else why bother sending messengers throughout history.
Regarding depression you are confusing Atman with Manas.
Not confused anything, we don't know where depression comes from, some can be within the mind, and some the soul.
Incorrect, Our Atman is Brahman and Sat-Chit-Annand, we have to realize that we already are Brahman by ridding ignorance/Maya of separation from Brahman.
As saying previously, we're only a program running in the Matrix, we're not the CPU; we're not in constant bliss in a pure state of consciousness, and only if we're dead can we attain being even close to Brahman, as matter is slowed down consciousness that isn't pure.
We are not all Divine, but our Atman is Sat-Chit-Annad.
Our atman is only in a state of sat chit ananda, when it is focused on Brahman, through following the right ways (dharma) to be part of Oneness.
- See we can't have truth, or existence (sat) without Brahman, and some people in life move away from the source, thus suffer more.
- We don't have consciousness or understanding, unless Brahman allows us to.
- Ananda is the divine bliss at the beginning of creation, and i've only met children who maintain that joy, adults generally forget the source of that energy.
Thus in all of them atman is just a vessel, unless it is filled by the divine spirit of Brahman.
Dharmah is not the same as religion.
Where did i say it was a religion; was referring to that to get everyone to follow righteousness (dharma), you need to be able to speak from people's own understanding.
No, Adharmah is not division based on religion or ideas
Oneness is the ultimate goal of all the messengers, they all taught dharma which is the right path to following Oneness....
When people say my book or religion is separate, they're not following Oneness, thus didn't understand the Dharma was one from the offset.
Their own ego has blinded them to understanding the whole, thus they can never be part of Brahman, and will always remain in the Maya until they get this.
forced belief that is Hinsa
Maybe in times of the inquisition; yet someone putting ideas across and evidence, is just fact; we can take it or leave it....
Yet clearly when you're ego is so big, you keep telling others they're wrong all the time, and that you're right, that is different; as it comes from arrogance, and not Oneness/dharma.
To refuse divine instructions is not Adharmic.
So a voice in your head says don't do that, as it will lead to much suffering, and you ignore it as your ego wants you to serve yourself first...Think that leads to adharmic action.
or Kalki comes to fix the world, and you spend all your time arguing with him from your ego, trying to show why he is wrong, as your text doesn't say that in your understanding; yet missing out that many might learn from what he could teach globally.
goes back to his home town, never establishes that place as the center for Dharmah.
'Shambhala is a Sanskrit term
meaning place of peace/tranquility/happiness'... And from there he shall teach the dharma; thus it is a symbolic place.
Again, you misunderstand Dharmah.
People get their ideas of dharma from their religious beliefs, if these are faulty, then it is possible they can follow adharma by bad beliefs....
Thus for Kalki to correct everyone's dharma, he must know their beliefs to correct and guide.
Well then there is no such thing as Resurrection.
It is only a different word used was the point, the same thing happening is discussed in multiple text.
Plus Mahapralay is not at the end of the Yuga.
Within multiple other texts, they happen at the same time; the new reality shall occur after the adharma is removed, then all shall be one with God.
Mahapralay is not destruction, it is transformation.
This is the bit your not getting, ungodly beings can't be in the presence of Brahman...
So within multiple prophecies it is portrayed as people burning, which is merely the light of God being so strong it washes all the darkness away, so for many it is a destruction.
As for many of the other things prophesied as destruction, take into account the Bible says God is 'removing those who damage the Earth'.
why only these 3 of 4 Puranas interest your comparison.
Without spending years reading, was why i thought to ask Hindus about their eschatology; though so far found it easier to look it up on Google instead.
