No, that is not what you said. You said that suffering
results from promiscuity. Cause and effect. I clearly showed that problems in marriage are primarily caused by things other than promiscuity.
I did not even suggest that every problem a marriage may have is caused by promiscuity. That doesn't make any sense. I said that promiscuity does cause suffering which is a statement of fact.
If you meant to say "Promiscuity may, in some few cases, contribute to marital problems", then that is what you should have said. I would not have disagreed with that. It seems your argument gets weaker and weaker with every revision. You went from "root of all" to "can cause".
I never even hinted that promiscuity always causes suffering, again that is simply incoherent. You keep misunderstanding my most simplistic statements. My argument has not changed, you just seem not to understand it.
My core claim is that promiscuity causes a lot of suffering. This fact is inescapable which is probably why your trying to distort everything I say.
Clearly that is not what I said. I said that promiscuous females are knowledgeable enough to prevent themselves from accidentally getting pregnant.
Incorrect, in many cases promiscuous women have unplanned pregnancies. Your the one who keeps making mistaken blanket claims, not me.
That you have to intentionally mis-represent my argument is a clear indication of the weakness of your own argument.
Wow, talk about hypocrisy.
Calm down. Take a deep breath. Try to write a paragraph that makes sense.
If I was any calmer I would be unconscious.
Most rape is about asserting power. Don't take my word for, look it up. Furthermore, there is no evidence to show that promiscuous men need to use rape to have sex.
Most rape is about gratifying lust or desire. Power is just one aspect of a very complicated issue of which promiscuity is another.
Nonsense. There is little distinction between rape and sexual violence. There is little distinction between divorce and family disruption.
There is enough of a difference so that both categories exists separately in moral statistics. Rape is to have sex with an unwilling partner whereas sexual violence is the intent to harm in addition to having sex.
More important, you have not shown, for any of the categories, that promiscuity is the cause. All you have done is make unsubstantiated assertions.
You have already said that promiscuity results in at least 6 of the 8 categories I have given. You invalidated your own claim here. Promiscuity results in the things I mentioned (all 8 +) before, it isn't merely incidental. If you can't admit something this self evident I don't hold out much hope for this discussion.
This isn't about my defending promiscuity. It's about showing that your assertions about promiscuity, even your watered down version, is without merit.
Trying to invalidate my condemnation of promiscuity is to defend it. This is absurd. If you can't admit that promiscuity leads to the spread of STDs, etc... then you might as well close your eyes, stick your fingers in your ears, and yell lalalalalalalal. Utterly ridiculous. Bias this strong is very rare even in a debate forum.
