By refusing to go head-to-head with her, he adds weak and afraid to outmatched. Trump would rather snipe at her to friendly audiences from a safe distance where nobody is asking him questions such as rallies or else he has sympathetic people asking him softball questions, although that hasn't been working well for Trump either, since he can't stay on script and has little insight or impulse control left. Trump wouldn't be able to do his little shuffle for a half hour outside of friendly venues.
But still, does any of that matter to the American electorate? Half already see Trump as unfit for the job, and the other half are indifferent to Trump's moral and intellectual failures. The few undecideds or swayable voters are apolitical people who don't watch debates or hear Harris taunting Trump about his apparent cowardice. So who would be affected by Trump ether debating or refusing to do so?
Still, it's interesting to see fear in this malignant narcissist with delusions of grandeur and unjustified self-confidence that he is the smartest person in any room he's in. It's suggests a degree of insight about his reality. He understands how much he was humiliated, which is apparently the most powerful trigger for him. Kimmel humiliated him at the Oscars and Trump is still fuming over that and giving Kimmel free press. And he's never recovered from Obama roasting him to his face in an annual, televised White House dinner (Trump never returned for another, which apparently is his MO when humiliated):
It sounds like you're the snob here.
Trump doesn't appeal to blue collar workers. He appeals to rural, undereducated, white males consuming and susceptible to conservative indoctrination media. He doesn't appeal to blue collar workers with college degrees, nor black, brown, or female blue collar workers. It's not working in the trades or service industries like hotels and restaurants that makes one a Trump supporter. It's indoctrinated grievance. It's their gullibility which leads to bitterness. It's the willingness to believe that their lives aren't what they were hoping for because of "DEI hires," Jews replacing them, and Haitian immigrants, Venezuelan gangs, and illegals getting their FEMA dollars and stealing the good jobs from them.
Walz does that more than Harris. He comes off as everyman. A former coach and schoolteacher, he grills and works under the hood of his car.
Kamala had educated and professional parents, but no silver spoon, hence the job at McDonalds, the mention of which for some reason set Trump off culminating in another embarrassment for him where he showed whoever was watching how out of touch he is with their world when he demonstrated how out of his element he was. Imagine Harris doing the same thing. She knows how to do a job like that because she's done it before.
Something similar happened with Walz and Vance when it came to ordering donuts and connecting with the workers. Vance was awkward. He didn't seem to know how to order donuts, and couldn't relate to the staff, whereas Walz was comfortable with both.
Trump bankrupted two casinos. How is that even possible?
He tanked the American economy with his mishandling of the pandemic.
And now, Nobel laureate economists, who actually ARE experts in economics, warn that Trump will stimulate inflation and recession with his tariffs.
Also, it looks like he'll die broke.
He's hardly an expert in economics or anything else except grifting and gaslighting.
It's a bachelor's degree. Experts in economics have PhDs. Trump couldn't get a job as an economist. He's not qualified.
Meet Ginger. She probably would agree with you about Kamala: