We read posts. It would have been read no matter what size it was. Anyway...
I have no idea what percentage of posts to other people you may read. I made sure even if not a response to person X, that person X would notice it. Is this against the Geneva convention, the Hague convention, or anything at all. Is post size the only argument you thought you could carry>
By this logic, we should be against heterosexual sex as well. It spreads a great deal of disease. The fact that such disease can be arrested by use of condoms and a lack of promiscuity does nothing to change this. So I hope you are going to be a virgin.
My God, this is like the tenth level of Hell where the worst arguments in history are on a broken record that plays forever. I have dealt with this one claim in at least 20 places. I only have two points and you had to ignore one of them to say this yet again. Apparently you do not read every posts or even 20% of them.
Heterosexuality has risks, Homosexuality has far more. However the difference is that
heterosexuality has the continuation of the human race to justify the risks. Homosexuality does not.
Really, you can't just pretend like it doesn't happen. Monogamous relationships and use of condoms are very effective at minimizing the spread of STDs. Gay or straight. Once again, you are arguing against having unsafe sex with multiple partners, and I think that most people here would agree with you in that.
I never said it did not lessen them and answered this same point at least 15 times. Until you find a post where I denied it I am not doing so again. I thought you said you read posts.
No, they present the data. If their data does not include the number of partners a person has, nor if they are in a monogamous relationship, then these categories won't be in the results presented.
Do you have any training in statistics. A group composed of all male on male homosexuals included all sub groups of male on male homosexuals. However it would not matter anyway. You may and do cherry pick any sub-group you wish, even ones that have less than 1% of homosexuals in it and my two primary points stand.
How about you find me a source that shows the likelihood of a gay man who has had very few partners and is currently in a monogamous relationship catching an STD.
Because it has no effect. Find any cherry picked sub group you wish. I don't care. The only group my two claims do not condemn is an abstinent homosexual subgroup.
And I once again accuse you of making this up and demand you provide a source to support your claim that the spread of HIV will be widespread among gay people, even if they have few partners and monogamous relationship.
And once again I will make you the same offer I make to every new poster after posting the data several times over. I will post it and sources yet again if you make it worth my while by promising to apologize and concede the point when I do. If you had the slightest confidence in what you claimed you should have no fear in promising to do so. That or you could do the most minimal of reviews.
I've noticed that you are refusing to live up to your agreement. Let me refresh your memory:
"For every claim you question or say I am making up facts that I provide reliable data for you must post an apology."
SOURCE
You have not lived up to this agreement. I have asked you to provide data supporting claims you made, and you have done no such thing. Specifically, these are the claims you have made and not provided evidence for:
I have not seen an agreement top you side of the bargain yet.
You claimed that the spread of disease among gay people causes an unacceptable level of death, suffering and costs billions of dollars without providing evidence.
SOURCE
This is not a statistical claim. It causes millions of deaths by spreading aids alone. It does not create a life, and if fact can't. One death is too many if there are no compensating gains. This one requires no statistics. Here are a few anyway.
Homosexuals live unhealthy lifestyles, and have historically accounted for the bulk of syphilis, gonorrhea, Hepatitis B, the "gay bowel syndrome" (which attacks the intestinal tract), tuberculosis and cytomegalovirus (27).
Depending on the city, 39-59% of homosexuals are infected with intestinal parasites like worms, flukes and amoebae, which is common in filthy third world countries (8).
(27) United States Congressional Record, June 29, 1989.
(8) Fields, Dr. E. "Is Homosexual Activity Normal?" Marietta, GA.
Now is the bulk acceptable suffering and cost for what has no justifying gain even possible?
You claimed that gay sex would be wrong even if it caused no death, suffering or cost without providing any explanation as to why.
SOURCE
See the above and here are a few more.
- The median age of death of homosexuals is 42 (only 9% live past age 65). This drops to 39 if the cause of death is AIDS. The median age of death of a married heterosexual man is 75 (8).
- The median age of death of lesbians is 45 (only 24% live past age 65). The median age of death of a married heterosexual woman is 79 (8).
- Homosexuals are 100 times more likely to be murdered (usually by another homosexual) than the average person, 25 times more likely to commit suicide, and 19 times more likely to die in a traffic accident (8).
8) Fields, Dr. E. "Is Homosexual Activity Normal?" Marietta, GA.
You claimed that promiscuity was not a significant cause of the spread of disease among gay people without providing evidence.
SOURCE
I did not. In fact provide any statement where I claimed that.
You claimed that homosexual people are far more promiscuous than heterosexual people without providing evidence.
SOURCE
The 2003-2004 Gay/Lesbian Consumer Online Census surveyed the lifestyles of 7,862 homosexuals. Of those involved in a "current relationship," only 15 percent describe their current relationship as having lasted twelve years or longer, with five percent lasting more than twenty years.[4] While this "snapshot in time" is not an absolute predictor of the length of homosexual relationships, it does indicate that few homosexual relationships achieve the longevity common in marriages.
Source: 2003-2004 Gay/Lesbian Consumer Online Census
In
The Sexual Organization of the City, University of Chicago sociologist Edward Laumann argues that "typical gay city inhabitants spend most of their adult lives in 'transactional' relationships, or short-term commitments of less than six months."[5]
A study of homosexual men in the Netherlands published in the journal
AIDS found that the "duration of steady partnerships" was 1.5 years.[6]
In his study of male homosexuality in
Western Sexuality: Practice and Precept in Past and Present Times, Pollak found that "few homosexual relationships last longer than two years, with many men reporting hundreds of lifetime partners."[7]
In
Male and Female Homosexuality, Saghir and Robins found that the average male homosexual live-in relationship lasts between two and three years.[8]
4. "Largest Gay Study Examines 2004 Relationships,"
GayWire Latest Breaking Releases, glcensus.org - gl census Resources and Information. This website is for sale!.
5. Adrian Brune, "City Gays Skip Long-term Relationships: Study Says,"
Washington Blade (February 27, 04): 12.
6. Maria Xiridou, et al, "The Contribution of Steady and Casual Partnerships to the Incidence of HIV Infection among Homosexual Men in Amsterdam,"
AIDS 17 (2003): 1031.
7. M. Pollak, "Male Homosexuality," in
Western Sexuality: Practice and Precept in Past and Present Times, ed. P. Aries and A. Bejin, translated by Anthony Forster (New York, NY: B. Blackwell, 1985): 40-61, cited by Joseph Nicolosi in
Reparative Therapy of Male Homosexuality (Northvale, New Jersey: Jason Aronson Inc., 1991): 124, 125.
8. M. Saghir and E. Robins,
Male and Female Homosexuality (Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1973): 225; L. A. Peplau and H. Amaro, "Understanding Lesbian Relationships," in
Homosexuality:Social, Psychological, and Biological Issues, ed. J. Weinrich and W. Paul (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1982).
Unless you can provide your evidence for these, you are making them up and they are all useless arguments. But, as per our agreement, provide the evidence and I will apologise public in any manner you wish.
Ok after you list them all, you finally agree so I will go back and supply them.
Even the far less than 1% of statistics I supplied above of the amount I could will not fit on one post so I am continuing it below.
you have established a sense of right and wrong...and do your best to apply good moral standards into your life. And thats awesome! But perhaps, this person has not had the oppurtunity to learn right from wrong. If they do not know they have sinned...God cannot condem them. For they hadnt known! So please, just give them a chance to learn...i dont think its morally right to apply same sex in MY life either. So i dont. And im sin free in that aspect. We arent all at the same level here. 
