Gjallarhorn
N'yog-Sothep
I was more logical than most. The arguments of hard determinism seemed to be all that could possibly be right.
And then you saw sensationalized accounts of NDEs and OOBEs and suddenly all that went out the window?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I was more logical than most. The arguments of hard determinism seemed to be all that could possibly be right.
Hmmm....You seem to think being an atheist or a theist is more built into the machine than I do. And it's very hard or rare to go against the design of the machine. I don't see it that way.
And then you saw sensationalized accounts of NDEs and OOBEs and suddenly all that went out the window?
I didn't see them as sensationalized but as sincere.
Hmmm....You seem to think being an atheist or a theist is more built into the machine than I do. And it's very hard or rare to go against the design of the machine. I don't see it that way.
Then that's understandable. Still, you would think there would be experimentation involved at least on your part...ever stick a fork in an outlet?
Why debate the existence of God with non-believers?
I told you in the past already that theism is a vocation to many. As is atheism.
Right, therefore the belief part is not all encompassing to the issue.
Why debate the existence of God with non-believers?
Are you attempting to make fun of what I said?
Why debate the existence of God with non-believers?
Debate? never a debates are mind wars and God is 'no-mind'.Why Debate the Existence of God with Non-believers?
I don't believe in popular religious dogma, but I consider God to be reality/eternal truth.Why bother?
Guess debates are incapable of changing the others view, so why waste energy?Why Debate the Existence of God with Non-believers?
Why bother?
Oh man, yes!! This is the conversation I've been waiting to hear. You're absolutely correct. God being a literal, actual sky-deity of whatever tradition forms or portrays it, is ultimately irrelevant to the function of God (in this context I'm speaking of an image, a symbol, an archetype) and how it draws out of the subconscious the yet unrealized nature of who we are. We come to know ourselves through God.We need functional illusions... beliefs that motivate us - particularly subconsciously.
Most of what we think & do originates subconsciously - an overwhelmingly powerful part of us! Getting in touch with our own personal beliefs - and love (aka God) is getting in touch with this powerful part of us!