• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why Didn't God Leave Huge Quantities of Secular Evidence For Jesus?

Pilgrim Soldier

Active Member
Not a single apostle is recorded in the secular historical record, NOT ONE. They were imaginary. If you can cite one secular historian that even mentions a single apostle, let alone their deaths then do it. I guarantee you and everyone else here 1000% you cannot do it because I have investigated it for years and haven't found anything. The apostles were imaginary, made up out of the gospel writers' minds.
I have never trusted secular historians, so I'm not interested in anything they have to say
 

Skywalker

Well-Known Member

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
The original autographs of the Bible were written before the Avesta. Did God Only Inspire the Original Autographs of the Bible?
Nope, try again. The "original autographs" of the Avesta appear to be even older. Actually they are pretty close to the same age, but Zoroastrianism still predates Christianity by about 500 years. Zoroaster is from the 5th century BCE. If you look into the Bible it is far younger than Christians claim that it is. It is not the oldest religious book or religion in the world.

Zoroastrianism - Wikipedia
 

Pilgrim Soldier

Active Member
So you don't believe that George Washington was the commander in chief during the American revolutionary war?
I never took the time to research anything about insignificant historical events. It makes no difference if George Washington was the commander and chief or a street sweeper. He is dead and he has nothing more to offer. There are far more important things to invest our time in, then reading the lives of dead men.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I never took the time to research anything about insignificant historical events. It makes no difference if George Washington was the commander and chief or a street sweeper. He is dead and he has nothing more to offer. There are far more important things to invest our time in, then reading the lives of dead men.
As long as you are consistent that may not be a problem.
 

Skywalker

Well-Known Member
Nope, try again. The "original autographs" of the Avesta appear to be even older. Actually they are pretty close to the same age, but Zoroastrianism still predates Christianity by about 500 years. Zoroaster is from the 5th century BCE. If you look into the Bible it is far younger than Christians claim that it is. It is not the oldest religious book or religion in the world.

Zoroastrianism - Wikipedia

The Avesta came after both the Christian and Jewish scriptures. Are the ideas of Jesus and Christianity borrowed from Mithra and Zoroastrianism? | GotQuestions.org

The only source for Zarathustra’s teachings is the Avesta, and the oldest copies we have of the Avesta date from the 13th century AD. The late date for this collection of writings lends no support whatsoever to the idea that Christians borrowed from Zoroastrianism (the oldest copies of the Jewish Scriptures that we have today date centuries before Christ, and the oldest complete manuscripts of the Christian Scriptures we have date from the 4th century AD).
 

Skywalker

Well-Known Member
My source says that they are the same age as the Old Testament and definitely predate the New Testament. You were the one that brought up the "original autographs" claim. By that standard you are wrong.

What difference does it make if the writings that are older than the Avesta aren't the original manuscripts? Did God Only Inspire the Original Autographs of the Bible?

Some “experts” today (who think they're smarter than God) claim that a copy [translation] of God's Word cannot be inspired, but that is untrue. Yes, a translation of the originals can be inspired. “Inspiration” means that God got a hold of the head of those men, the heart of those men, and the hand of those men, and guided them to say what He wanted them to say!
 
Top