• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why do you accept Jesus as Messiah?

Why do you believe Jesus was the Messiah

  • Because He said He was

    Votes: 1 25.0%
  • Because you were born a Christian

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Because the Bible says so

    Votes: 2 50.0%
  • Because a priest told you

    Votes: 1 25.0%

  • Total voters
    4

ppp

Well-Known Member
We believe in Shakespeare's writings but have less info that that of scriptures, why should we not believe in the scriptures?
No, we don't. We all know that Shakespeare's writings are fictional. If you are claiming that the Bible is likewise fictional then sure no problem with that.
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
Yes true. How do we know something is true or not?

Even the most careful historian can make mistakes and many are biased.

The only way I know is to use all my intelligence and my whole heart. Our intelligence can evaluate whether something is reasonable and holds together. It can look for signs that someone is honest or hypocritical. Our heart, our intuition, can ideally sense the nature of a person.

Of course, being imperfect, we make mistakes. So the final step is to practice - to live according to our understanding and see the result.

.
 

Clara Tea

Well-Known Member
What made you believe in Christ? No one has met Him. All we have are reported, unverified Biblical records of His earthly ministry. We cannot prove the authenticity of those records.

So what made you a devout Christian? Something you believe Jesus said or taught? How do we know what Jesus actually said when we have no written words in His handwriting? How do you authentic that Jesus spoke those words in the Gospels as He didn’t confirm His sayings in writing anywhere?

So are Christians believing in Jesus on ‘reported’ sayings and here say? If you believe in the Bible, how do you know it’s true? Evidence? Or do you just trust that it is from God and that’s that?

If belief in Jesus was right, why were there so many wars and tortures in His name? Even in modern times, knowing that God told us to turn the other cheek and not kill, we went to war with Iraq (and warned not to in Revelation).

I believe that the religion is fine (thou shalt not kill). But, those who attempt to follow the religion fall prey to fear (911 attack, if we don't attack them soon, and on their own soil, we'll be sitting ducks, rather than letting God handle the terrorists in his own way).

But why don't we trust God to take care of terrorists? I think that it is for the same reason that we don't walk down a busy freeway or leap off of a high building....we know that God wouldn't protect us if we used our free will to do something stupid. So, though everyone knows what God expects of them, they don't sufficiently belief in God to obey him without question. This is why the world is in such a mess today.
 

Clara Tea

Well-Known Member
Even the most careful historian can make mistakes and many are biased.

The only way I know is to use all my intelligence and my whole heart. Our intelligence can evaluate whether something is reasonable and holds together. It can look for signs that someone is honest or hypocritical. Our heart, our intuition, can ideally sense the nature of a person.

Of course, being imperfect, we make mistakes. So the final step is to practice - to live according to our understanding and see the result.

.

That is a great answer. You have the capacity for great love, and that love guides you. That is obviously what God had intended.

Perhaps that is the ticket to heaven? While the stone cold hearts can't make it into heaven, using pragmatic logic to deny the existence of God, your warm heart can cut through the haze and see issues clearly.
 

Clara Tea

Well-Known Member
Even the most careful historian can make mistakes and many are biased.

The only way I know is to use all my intelligence and my whole heart. Our intelligence can evaluate whether something is reasonable and holds together. It can look for signs that someone is honest or hypocritical. Our heart, our intuition, can ideally sense the nature of a person.

Of course, being imperfect, we make mistakes. So the final step is to practice - to live according to our understanding and see the result.

.

That kind of judgement doesn't hold up in courts....they demand evidence. Yet, I know of few other ways to really know and understand God. It seems that religion is an art, and we have to feel our way to salvation.

The path to salvation is a lonely road. Generally we can't walk there in a crowd because, quite frankly, I don't think that most people will end up going there. We can't, for example, rely on PhD theologists because they, too, are sometimes wrong, particularly in these end times. For example, Reverend John Hagee said that we have to pray to Jesus to win the war in Iraq. Really? Kill more effectively with the help of Jesus? If we attempt to follow the teachings of Hagee, we may never get to heaven. Free choice is a lonely path, filled with temptations, filled with more educated people (especially in theology), and that makes it difficult to walk the path alone, as we are supposed to.

We're supposed to read the bible (not a condensed children's version of it), understand it, and use it as a guide to the afterlife.
 

Clara Tea

Well-Known Member
No, we don't. We all know that Shakespeare's writings are fictional. If you are claiming that the Bible is likewise fictional then sure no problem with that.

Yet the norms and mores taught in the bible(s) seem good. For example, "thou shalt not kill."
 

Clara Tea

Well-Known Member
You can study history, archeology, and the Bible itself. It's teachings benefit you no matter who you are, they make you a better person. It's prophecies are reliable and accurate, they come true 100% of the time. It speaks of real events and real people in real places in specifics which archaeology has time and again proven to be accurate. It is all canon and in agreement. It claims to be from a superhuman source, Jehovah God claims to be its author, and it has proven itself to be more than just human wisdom. It's words apply as well today as they did in the past. It has survived the test of time, and extreme enemies who have tried to snuff it out of existence. And it has survived unchanged over that time period.

I think that the bible is largely true. It has, indeed, been used to locate long lost cities. However, there are certain passages of the bible that I suspect are misinterpreted. For example, I doubt that Jonah lived in the belly of a whale. I suspect that the correct translation is that he was walking through the desert and was hungry and God produced a miracle in the form of a beached whale, and he "sustained himself in the belly of a whale"....meaning ate whale meat....but it came to mean that he was swallowed by a whale.
 

RestlessSoul

Well-Known Member
I agree that there must be an inbuilt mechanism, antenna, instinct which can lead us to God, but I’m thinking that we need to use it in conjunction with reason otherwise it could lead us to superstition instead of reality.


With practice, and guidance, intuition can become a working part of the mind. Like reason, it of course has it's limitations. Logic and reason alone will not bring us to God, intuition alone will not bring us to right thinking and understanding. But if we are sincerely searching for God, it is in our hearts and not our heads that we are most likely to find Him. When we need Him enough, and humbly open our hearts without demands and without expectations, he will enter there. That, at least, has been my experience.
 

stvdv

Veteran Member
How did you know it was Christ? Just interested.
That's easy. Sai Baba told us "if you repeat God's Name (the one you like) and think of Him (the one you like) then He (the one you like) will appear".

Key to have the Lord appear to you, is to have the correct "stamp" (image of your beloved form) and "address" (name of your beloved form). Hence one pointed concentration is important if you want to draw the Lord near to you (in the form of your chosing)

God can assume any form, but we must decide which form we choose.
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
I do not believe even in the existence of any God since I have not come across any evidence to support that idea. So, believing in any prophet / son / messenger / manifestation / mahdi is out of question; whether Adam, Noah, Zoroaster, Moses, Jesus, Mohammad, Joseph Smith, Bahaollah or Mirza Gholam Ahmad.
 

stvdv

Veteran Member
How did you know it was Christ? Just interested.
First we need to choose: formless God or God with form

Some choose "formless God", of course God will honour your choice and you will get no visions.

When I started my Spiritual Quest, I liked advaita best. Only God is real, I am Divine etc. I am not the body, mind, emotions , so the formless God.

I even told God (mentally) "I don't want visions and voices, those people having them are sometimes so full of themselves, it's better I don't have those".

After I told God this, whenever I closed my eyes it was pitch black. Even when sitting for 30min, I got no vision of God, pitch black. I was amazed how black. Sometimes people in a group did visualization exercises, I tried a few times, but again pitch black. Took me a while to remember God Granted what I asked Him for (no voices and visions).
 

stvdv

Veteran Member
How did you know it was Christ? Just interested.

Advaita is not easy. Believing "I am Divine" means you need no doctor even. Can there be any doctor better than "the Divine"?

Sai Baba made it very clear, that you can not start Advaitha without having been a devotee of God first.

So, my choice of Advaita was "pure" ego. Because, when I got major challenges like cancer and pain, the belief of Advaita "I am God" did not work for me.

So, I changed to God with form. Please Sai Baba, I need You. You are my Doctor, I don't go to hospital doctors. Tell me what diet I should do and "let food be my medicine"

I still love Advaita, but also still having challenges like cancer, so I decided to stick to "God with Form; Sai Baba Form". Works miracles for me

The Day Jesus appeared to me, was during a 10 hour chanting in a Christian Church with all Christian hymns. I did do my mantra Sohum (I and God are One), and after ca. 6h continuous chanting, Christ appeared. Bright, full of light, visible like I see other people.
 
Last edited:

Messianic Israelite

Active Member
What made you believe in Christ? No one has met Him. All we have are reported, unverified Biblical records of His earthly ministry. We cannot prove the authenticity of those records.

So what made you a devout Christian? Something you believe Jesus said or taught? How do we know what Jesus actually said when we have no written words in His handwriting? How do you authentic that Jesus spoke those words in the Gospels as He didn’t confirm His sayings in writing anywhere?

So are Christians believing in Jesus on ‘reported’ sayings and here say? If you believe in the Bible, how do you know it’s true? Evidence? Or do you just trust that it is from God and that’s that?
Hi loverofhumanity. Good morning. I believe in Yahshua my Savior for several reasons. The first reason I believe is because he has fulfilled the prophesies concerning him. They are many scriptures that indicate a Messiah would come and save His people such as Genesis 3:15; Genesis 49:10; Micah 5:2; Isaiah 7:14; Isaiah 9:6; Isaiah 40:3-5; Psalm 69:8; Isaiah 11:10; Psalm 31:13 etc. Therefore the Word of Yahweh harmonizes completely from Genesis to Revelation. This beautiful harmony of the scriptures is proof that Yahshua, originally a spirit-being, took on human form, to be the sin-bearer of Yahweh's people.

The second reason is the content of what Yahshua taught. He wasn't teaching anything unscriptural. As I mentioned on another thread, Yahshua came to magnify the law and make it honorable (Isaiah 42:21). He came to at a time when Judaism needed to be reformed. Judaism was going astray, putting their traditions which they had formulated above the Law of Yahweh such as in Matthew 15:2. They had failed to show love to Yahweh and their neighbor as commanded in the Hebrew Scriptures. The third reason is that from my own personal experience, following Yahshua and keeping the commandments has produced good fruit in my life. I can see that by following Yahshua we can bring our lives to a state of perfection pleasing to the Father (Matthew 5:48).

The fourth reason is that it makes sense. Yahweh sent His son, the one who pre-existed with the Father in the Hebrew Scriptures and was known as the Angel of Yahweh, to save us from our sins. He showed to Abraham what he would do at Mount Moriah when it was told to Abraham to offer his son as a sacrifice there, and Abraham called that place Yahweh Yireh meaning Yahweh will provide. Yahweh has provided wicked sinners a way out. A way to have their sins cleansed through baptism (Isaiah 1:18) so we can have access to Yahweh.

Bible Gateway passage: Genesis 22:13-15 - American Standard Version

We know from the Word that sins (or transgressions of the Biblical Law we read in 1 John 3:4) separate us from Yahweh (Isaiah 59:2). How then would the nations, or anyone, whether home-born or foreigner, have the chance to be saved except their sins were forgiven by miraculous intervention? The problem is, when you sin, the more you sin, the less chance you have of having your prayers answered, of having a healthy relationship with Yahweh and making it in to the Kingdom. It's a vicious cycle ultimatly leading the sinner to a destiny of never recovering from their predicament. But Yahweh Yireh. He provided the sin sacrifice so anyone who thirsts for righteousness could enter in to the Kingdom and find a place in Yahweh's grace.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
No, we don't. We all know that Shakespeare's writings are fictional. If you are claiming that the Bible is likewise fictional then sure no problem with that.
No.. that isn't what I mean.

How do you know that Shakespeare wrote them?
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Such a literalist. ;)

Yes, but not on the original site. The original site is still basically a
bare rock, even today. It has been excavated. The rock Tyre stood on
lies just off the coast. The causeway which led to the city which
Alexander used to destroy it is now gone. There is a city called Tyre,
but it is not at the site which was destroyed by Alexander. There is an
older book out there which is pretty thorough in the Tyre prophecies. It
is Evidence That Demands a Verdict (Josh McDowell). I do not necessarily
recommend that book in general, but it is good on the Tyre prophecy.

John Oakes, PhD
 

ppp

Well-Known Member
Yes, but not on the original site. The original site is still basically a
bare rock, even today. It has been excavated. The rock Tyre stood on
lies just off the coast. The causeway which led to the city which
Alexander used to destroy it is now gone. There is a city called Tyre,
but it is not at the site which was destroyed by Alexander. There is an
older book out there which is pretty thorough in the Tyre prophecies. It
is Evidence That Demands a Verdict (Josh McDowell). I do not necessarily
recommend that book in general, but it is good on the Tyre prophecy.
Why are you talking about Alexander? Is Alexander the secret identity of Nebuchadnezzar?

Is Alexander Batman? :D
 

ppp

Well-Known Member
No.. that isn't what I mean.

How do you know that Shakespeare wrote them?
I don't. But it doesn't matter. If it turns out that that the plays were really written by Amanda Jenkins from London, it would be a really interesting historical discovery, but it would not be crucial to our application of the plays as either entertainment or literature. OTOH, if it turns out that Amandia Jinkius of Londinium wrote the New Testament...or even just the books attributed to Paul...would be a really interesting historical discovery and Christianity would be hosed.
 
Top