I'm still not sure what you're getting at. Pointing it out would help.Any of it.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'm still not sure what you're getting at. Pointing it out would help.Any of it.
Just asked a simple question.I'm still not sure what you're getting at. Pointing it out would help.
I guess the answer would be "I never made a statement of truth."Just asked a simple question.
I guess the answer would be "I never made a statement of truth."
You lied?I guess the answer would be "I never made a statement of truth."
It seems that you are trying to be difficult by not pointing out the flaws in my statement while assuming I was lying.You lied?
Oops. Then yes, I do not hold moral beliefs or truths.Or did you mean you never made a statement about truth? But that wasn't what I asked. I asked if what you said was true.
Naw, WIllamena is merely a semantical hairsplitter, imho. It's all good though.It seems that you are trying to be difficult by not pointing out the flaws in my statement while assuming I was lying.
Whoa, I didn't say anything about your moral beliefs. But you do hold truths, even this statement (if it's true).Oops. Then yes, I do not hold moral beliefs or truths.
Mmk...We all do.
Well, technically semantics has nothing to do with it... but, now, that's semantical.Naw, WIllamena is merely a semantical hairsplitter, imho. It's all good though.
Yes, but one will be a more accurate reflection of actuality (truth) than the other.Different paradigms. Neither wrong nor right, just different.
Yes, but one will be a more accurate reflection of actuality (truth) than the other.
Only if truth exists outside of reality. :areyoucraYes, but one will be a more accurate reflection of actuality (truth) than the other.
That requires the suspension of your critical faculties, though. Why do you, being much more than usually rigorous in your thought, choose to suspend disbelief in this area? Why here and not elsewhere?Because I choose to.
Reality is truth. Paradigms are only conceptions of reality, they are not reality itself.Only if truth exists outside of reality. :areyoucra
I just refuse to go to this fantasyland where conceptual paradigms become their own realities. I understand that this is how we experience them, because we are "within" them, but I also understand that they are only reflections of an actual reality that we do not control nor create.doppelgänger;941408 said:You're in a strange loop.
I understand that this is how we experience them, because we are "within" them, but I also understand that they are only reflections of an actual reality.
Some people are aware that their concepts of truth and reality are concepts, and that there is a true reality that exists regardless of our conceptualizations of it, and some people are not.doppelgänger;941466 said:They are only perceived as reflections of an actual reality. Scientific progress and wisdom occur in the gaps created by embracing uncertainty. When models for reality are no longer recognized as models, God is dead.