Kelly of the Phoenix
Well-Known Member
There is no clinical evidence for either the death or the resurrection.Feel free to share your thoughts.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
There is no clinical evidence for either the death or the resurrection.Feel free to share your thoughts.
Paul and other members made it important. The ministry was what was originally important.Yeah, that may be true for the overall opinion, but we’re talking about one small aspect, Jesus rising from the grave, which is foundational to the Christian Faith
It’s all important. Paul could see “Jesus” and who he really was. He’s god in the flesh. He will return. A new heaven and new earth he will bring. Make of that what you will. Oh yeah and love is important. lolPaul and other members made it important. The ministry was what was originally important.
I would suggest you do some more thinking about a person rising from the dead. How could this apply to the world today? Think about it. Really give it some thought. I mean hey, infinite space exists so if that doesn’t blow your mind. Now, if that exists, someone rising from death is nothing in comparison. Or, if science is more your thing for explaining life then have at it.There is no clinical evidence for either the death or the resurrection.
Feel free to share your thoughts.
I think soul is just a fancy way of saying human.Why Don’t You Believe Jesus Rose From The Grave?
To believe:
"Jesus Rose From The Grave"
Implies to believe:
"Jesus died"
Jesus is Atma
Atma does not die
Hence, from Advaita POV:
"I don't Believe Jesus Rose From The Grave"
I don't know about your "soul" interpretationI think soul is just a fancy way of saying human.
The way I see it at atma is a fancy way of saying human.
I don't know about your "soul" interpretation
BUT
"Atma" is definitely not "human"
Well, the Hindu Scriptures define it differentlyThe way I see it at atma is a fancy way of saying human.
Yeah, the Bible scriptures define soul differently as well, but I always keep a down to earth view when I read scripture.Well, the Hindu Scriptures define it differently
BUT of course
You are free to create your own definitions
That is always good, I do the sameYeah, the Bible scriptures define soul differently as well, but I always keep a down to earth view when I read scripture.
I don't know about your "soul" interpretation
BUT
"Atma" is definitely not "human"
As a Baha'i, I believe exactly the same things.As a spiritualist, I believe that our consciousness lives on as a form of energy, which I refer to as our soul and/or spirit. I also believe that we will retain our memories, along with our personality, after death, but we will acquire a much broader perspective than what we have now. I believe that once we die, we will be free of the physical and psychological constraints of our humanity, allowing us to see and understand beyond what we see and understand now.
As a spiritualist, I believe that
"our" consciousness you said. This means "we", so also "you" are different from consciousness.our consciousness
As a spiritualist, I believe that our consciousness lives on as a form of energy, which I refer to as our soul and/or spirit. I also believe that we will retain our memories, along with our personality, after death, but we will acquire a much broader perspective than what we have now. I believe that once we die, we will be free of the physical and psychological constraints of our humanity, allowing us to see and understand beyond what we see and understand now.
As a Baha'i, I believe exactly the same things.
@Trailblazer"our" consciousness you said. This means "we", so also "you" are different from consciousness.
Question:
1) Who is that "you" that owns consciousness?
I believe that the "me" that is responsible for my consciousness is my soul (from a Baha'i POV, which is my POV).@Trailblazer
Question:
1) Who is that "you" that owns consciousness?
(from Bahai POV, or from your POV)
Thank you, "soul" has been clearly describedI believe that the "me" that is responsible for my consciousness is my soul (from a Baha'i POV, which is my POV).
Below is what I believe about the soul.
The soul is a creation of God and humans got a soul sometime during the course of evolution, when man became distinct from the animal.
The soul is s mystery whose reality the most learned of men have failed to grasp, and whose mystery no mind can ever hope to unravel.
The soul associates itself with the body at the time of conception.
From then on the soul works through the brain and while we are living on earth in a physical body. The soul is associated with the brain and it animates and directs the brain and the body, but when we die and no longer have a physical body the soul continues to live. It lives forever, and that is why it is called an 'immortal soul.'
The soul manifests itself in our thought process. The soul itself does not have cognitive functions, only the brain has those, but the soul 'animates' the brain so it is responsible for our ability to think and feel. If we had no soul the body would have no life.
The soul is the sum total of the personality so it is the person himself; the physical body is pure matter with no real identity. The person, after he dies and leaves his physical body behind remains the same person, and he goes to the spiritual world where he continues the life he conducted in the physical world. The soul takes on some kind of a spiritual body made up of elements that exist in the spiritual world and continues to live forever.
You say: the "me" that is responsible for my consciousness is my soulI believe that the "me" that is responsible for my consciousness is my soul
More clearly stated:You say: the "me" that is responsible for my consciousness is my soul
IF you use the phrase "my soul"
THEN there is "soul" and there is "my"
Clearly these two are different !!
You can't ignore that
The person is their soul. Their physical body is pure matter with no real identity.So, the Question remains:
"who are you (my part, who owns a soul)"
Agreed:I do not own my soul, I am a soul