Uhm... Literalism is the actual minority. Ask any believer and you will find that they don't literally believe the Bible. Does not make the stories unimportant or in useful to those people though.They’re in the minority. The very small minority.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Uhm... Literalism is the actual minority. Ask any believer and you will find that they don't literally believe the Bible. Does not make the stories unimportant or in useful to those people though.They’re in the minority. The very small minority.
Personally I wouldn’t consider them Christian.
You’re wrongUhm... Literalism is the actual minority. Ask any believer and you will find that they don't literally believe the Bible. Does not make the stories unimportant or in useful to those people though.
Yeah, that may be true for the overall opinion, but we’re talking about one small aspect, Jesus rising from the grave, which is foundational to the Christian Faith.It's really only fundamentalists that believe in any sort of of biblical literalism (and evangelicals).
"According to a 2022 Gallup poll, the evangelical movement and some Protestant denominations are most likely to view the Bible as literally true and inerrant. The poll also found that 30% of Protestants and 15% of Catholics believe the Bible is literally true."
This is hardly all Christians.
It's really only fundamentalists that believe in any sort of of biblical literalism (and evangelicals).
"According to a 2022 Gallup poll, the evangelical movement and some Protestant denominations are most likely to view the Bible as literally true and inerrant. The poll also found that 30% of Protestants and 15% of Catholics believe the Bible is literally true."
This is hardly all Christians.
I wonder when exactly the myth of Jesus was written, and became part of the basis of the religion. S we know the Gospels were written long after the time Jesus was supposedly alive.It was true 2000 years ago and it is the foundation of the Christian faith.
There's no reason to treat the Gospels as history.It is why the disciples of Jesus believed Jesus was whom He claimed to be. It is what Jesus said He would do. If Jesus did not rise from the dead they would have gone back to fishing etc just as followers of other so called Messiahs did when their Messiahs did not do what the Messiah was to do. Jesus however showed that God was on His side and that He was alive and would continue to do what the Messiah was to do.
Because the Enlightenment spoiled the non-reasoning believer's default. No one who inteprets the Bible literally does so based on facts and reason, they have other non-rational motives. It's apparent most believers have no idea why they believe, they just do. They mimic those who taught them.It is these days in Western culture that people are called fanatics for believing the plain simple truths of the gospel.
The stats say otherwiseYou’re wrong
Personally, believing that someone isn’t a Christian isn’t judging them.What you said is not an unusual response, as Christians frequently pompously judge other Christians because they disagree on biblical interpretation and church doctrines. In fact, this self-righteous judgment dates back to biblical times with the early Christians (see 1 Corinthians 1:10–17). In my opinion, it is not your right or personal responsibility to determine who is or who isn't a true Christian. Are you familiar with the scriptures about not judging others?
Yeah, that may be true for the overall opinion, but we’re talking about one small aspect, Jesus rising from the grave, which is foundational to the Christian Faith.
Christians used to say "I have a close personal relationship with Jesus", but this has gone out of favor and is not longer taught as something to repeat.I feel Jesus’ presence.
No it hasn’t.Christians used to say "I have a close personal relationship with Jesus", but this has gone out of favor and is not longer taught as something to repeat.
Some fake it till they make it. Oh but making it is oh so sweet.I wonder when exactly the myth of Jesus was written, and became part of the basis of the religion. S we know the Gospels were written long after the time Jesus was supposedly alive.
There's no reason to treat the Gospels as history.
Because the Enlightenment spoiled the non-reasoning believer's default. No one who inteprets the Bible literally does so based on facts and reason, they have other non-rational motives. It's apparent most believers have no idea why they believe, they just do. They mimic those who taught them.
Personally I think they have missed Christianity’s message.My wife doesn't. Nor does my family. And they are all Christian.
Hence my reference to a "no true Scotsman" fallacy..
Personally I think they have missed Christianity’s message.
Look at the stats of Christian’s that literally believe he rose from the dead.No the MYTH of Jesus rising from the grave is foundational.
Not whether or not it is literal fact.
That is a minority opinion I substantiated
Look at the stats of Christian’s that literally believe he rose from the dead.
What's the message they are missing?Personally I think they have missed Christianity’s message.
No it isn’t, but I’m done going back and forth.I did. That is tangential to biblical literalism. Which I posted the Gallup stats for.