rational experiences
Veteran Member
If it wasn't true you lying as science then why did you infer man a human was a mountain?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Don't forget. The most convincing evidence of God is my enormous schwanzstucker.I believe first and foremost God is real because He abides in me.
My testimony to that affect should be enough but people need to know there are discernable affects that indicate god is present.
1. God speaks to me.
2. God gives me dreams and visons.
3. God heals my diseases.
4. God keeps me from sin.
5. God helps me to understand scripture
6. God speaks through me.
Why I am a good proof that there is a God
The truthful G-d is self-evident and the One who is Self-Evident doesn't, necessarily, need any proof and or evidence. It is another thing that everything and every person existing in the Universe/s, believer or no- believer, points towards Him and His Existence, as a good evidence/proof/sign of Him , if one has the truthful insight. Right?
Does the writer of the OP like it, please?
Regards
Man's conscious warning I must Idealise the modern Muslim Baha'i terms as if we believe the fallen star holy the earth is prophecised to roll.
Loss of ET extra magnetism.in terrestrial by holy dust radiation loss.
Colder ice causes.
Shifting poles.
Taking contorted earth. New earth body.
Thesis what science of man caused as earths God end by the thesis science.
Earth began as O God.
Earth shifted into a new God O.
By rolling.
Don't forget. The most convincing evidence of God is my enormous schwanzstucker.
Nor me, that's why I remain an atheist.I believe fiction does not serve a evidence of God.
Nor me, that's why I remain an atheist.
Okay, now I'm curious. How on Earth would you hold his feet to the fire over his being an atheist because he doesn't believe that fiction is evidence for a god? I find that statement fascinating.don't believe that is the reason but I will accept your word for it rather than try to hold your feet to the fire which RF does not like me to do
I enjoyed the wheel of Time too. It had some problems but was overall a good series. But Jordan was not even close to being the first to write about multiverses. Multiverses were practically a fad from the 60s through the early 80s. Farmer. Simak. Norton. Niven. Heinlein. Anthony. Hambly. Donaldson. Zelazny. Boyett. Brin. To name a few. I was commenting to a friend a few months ago that we don't see as many stories about crossing over world as we did back in the day.I can recommend Robert Jordan and Wheel of Time series. He studied Physics and it shows in his books. He was one of the first authors to write about multiverses.
Okay, now I'm curious. How on Earth would you hold his feet to the fire over his being an atheist because he doesn't believe that fiction is evidence for a god? I find that statement fascinating.
I enjoyed the wheel of Time too. It had some problems but was overall a good series. But Jordan was not even close to being the first to write about multiverses. Multiverses were practically a fad from the 60s through the early 80s. Farmer. Simak. Norton. Niven. Heinlein. Anthony. Hambly. Donaldson. Zelazny. Boyett. Brin. To name a few. I was commenting to a friend a few months ago that we don't see as many stories about crossing over world as we did back in the day.
Simply telling people what you "believe" is not a method of holding someone's feet to the fire.I believe viewing the Word of God as fiction is an a priori argument and that means there is something that leads to the a priori position.
Niven: Galaxy v27n03 (1968 10) : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet ArchiveI am a big fan of Sci-Fi. I have read books by Farmer, Norton, Niven, Heinlein, Donaldson, Zelazny and Brin. I don't remember any of them about a multiverse. Riverworld was about this universe. I suppose the cocoon state seems out of this universe but I believe it is not. It made for a good television movie. Do you mean Piers Anthony? I have read him. I believe the crossover to a different world is still most likely this universe. I like the TV series Sliders since that is true multiverse.
Yes but that is your belief, not mine, which is why I agreed with your claim to not believe fiction was evidence for a deity.I believe viewing the Word of God as fiction is an a priori argument and that means there is something that leads to the a priori position.
I believe fiction does not serve a evidence of God.
Nor me, that's why I remain an atheist.
I don't believe that is the reason
Niven: Galaxy v27n03 (1968 10) : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
Farmer: World of Tiers
Heinlein: Several. Most notably, Number of the Beast
Donaldson: Thomas Covenant - a creator that sent him to one of his worlds.
Norton - Crossroads of Time
Zelazny - Chronicles of Amber; A Dark Traveling
Brin - Practice Effect
Anthony: The Apprentice Adept series. Of Man and Manta series
Wells: Men Like Gods
Asimov: The Gods Themselves
I liked the first season of Sliders. After that, not so much.
Thanks. I had not heard of that site. There are a few books that are no longer in print that I would like to find.Thank you. I will put them on my wishlist at www.bookmooch.com. If you have any books you wish to trade that is a good site.
I have read the Apprentice Adept series and all of Asimov's books but those a long time ago so I don't remember them well.