Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No. For scholars it is determined on who can support their argument with rational thought and evidence.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why I CANNOT Believe in The Resurrection
- Thread starter SeekingAllTruth
- Start date
-
- Tags
- resurrection
Using the bible that he rejects and denies to support his arguments? Go figure ?
But the scholars say...
Do you have any arguments against the bible that don't start with the Atheists favourite " The scholars say ..." " All scholars agree ...." The majority of ..... " ect ect ?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
You are not debating in good faith.
That indicates that you know that you are wrong. A personal that actually believed would not have to stoop to such a tactic.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Can you debate rationally and honestly? Right now it appears that the answer is no. It looks as if you are very afraid.
Let's use our OWN sense making then .
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Okay, I won't refer to scholars and you won't refer to your book of myths.
I'm not the one avoiding by appeals to authority.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
LOL, you do not understand that term.
The bible is the topic of this OP .If ' Appeals to Authority ' was the discussion you would win .
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
And you could not read it without scholars.
Trailblazer
Veteran Member
I know that.
Ok, I'm not the one that keeps referring to ' scholars ' .
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Once again you do not understand the phrase "appeals to authority". You keep shooting yourself in the foot.
Amen .
Are you not referring to Scholars ,referencing the opinion of an authority as evidence to support your arguments?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
So what? You have just admitted that you cannot reason properly. There are times that one uses scholars directly. You are always relying on them at least indirectly. You might as well admit that you cannot support what you claimed.
Early on you tried to claim eyewitness testimony. That claim fell apart. The Bible does not claim to be that. Which would be a mistake believing that without evidence anyway. To support that claim you would need . . . come on, you know the term.
What do you need to claim eyewitness testimony?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
There are proper and improper appeals to authority. You do not appear to know the difference. There is no problem with the proper use of authorities.
Yes and my charge is the way in which you are referring to them . I've already stated ' which scholars '? , Are you so nieve to believe there's no bias ?