Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
They are all a misspelling of "thair"?You do understand the difference between “there,” “they’re,” and “their,” I hope?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
They are all a misspelling of "thair"?You do understand the difference between “there,” “they’re,” and “their,” I hope?
I can’t help what the text actually says. It says what it says. If God wrote it, God lied. Science shows the earth to be an ellipsoid — a slightly wide sphere. Not a disc, as the text clearly implies.Your practically saying God didn't know the shape of the earth he created . As the Author couldn't know the information unless given directly by God.
I don’t doubt it.I'm exhausted here..
Okay @Barry Johnson why is that funny? You do not seem to know the history of the Bible at all.It did not exist at the time of the writing of that verse. When written that was just one letter of many. He could not have been referring to the New Testament.
You do not seem to understand that man decided what was and what was not scripture. There were countless "gospels" at one time.
Literalists simply cannot understand why they are claiming that God is a liar. The odds are that he will misinterpret this.I can’t help what the text actually says. It says what it says. If God wrote it, God lied. Science shows the earth to be an ellipsoid — a slightly wide sphere. Not a disc, as the text clearly implies.
What do you believe the message of the Bible is?Quite the opposite. You merely have a very skewed interpretation of some of them due to your Jesus belief.
Its clear you do not 'believe 'the bible. Thats why we are taking in circles here .Okay @Barry Johnson why is that funny? You do not seem to know the history of the Bible at all.
This isn't my first rodeo . But even if I didn't know any ' history ' on the bible. The bible itself would be sufficient.Okay @Barry Johnson why is that funny? You do not seem to know the history of the Bible at all.
I wouldn’t bet against your assessment.Literalists simply cannot understand why they are claiming that God is a liar. The odds are that he will misinterpret this.
Again, not referring to any of the NT texts, if “word” refers to texts at all.“For the word of God is living and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the division of soul and spirit, and of joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart. And there is no creature hidden from His sight, but all things are naked and open to the eyes of Him to whom we must give account.”
Hebrews 4:12-13 NKJV
Again, not referring to any of the NT texts, if “word” refers to texts at all.
It’s clear for anyone that has the Spirit of God, don’t expect you to understand.Again, not referring to any of the NT texts, if “word” refers to texts at all.
I would say that it does not have one. Different writers had different beliefs. A person can interpret a message from it, but that does not mean that it has an overriding message.What do you believe the message of the Bible is?
Understanding and believing are two very different things.Its clear you do not 'believe 'the bible. Thats why we are taking in circles here .
And this is why you do not understand the Bible. You only believe in it. And it is your particular belief that you have placed upon it.This isn't my first rodeo . But even if I didn't know any ' history ' on the bible. The bible itself would be sufficient.
He is a fellow Christian. Why do you think that he does not have the "Spirit of God". I would argue that literalists cannot have that spirit.It’s clear for anyone that has the Spirit of God, don’t expect you to understand.
Gibberish. I believe 1cor 15 .1-4 do you ?And this is why you do not understand the Bible. You only believe in it. And it is your particular belief that you have placed upon it.
Do you understand how literalists turn God into a liar?
Psalm 50 is a good one for you to comtemplateHe is a fellow Christian. Why do you think that he does not have the "Spirit of God". I would argue that literalists cannot have that spirit.