• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why I'm Not A "Feminist"

Status
Not open for further replies.

MysticSang'ha

Big Squishy Hugger
Premium Member
So, we have a member who is saying women shouldn't be doing this and women shouldn't be doing that.

We have another member who is continuing to challenge that notion.

Suddenly the member who has been challenging the strict gender roles is being talked about for his gender identity, and if he is being too offensive? Why is his gender identity and if he's being too offensive to Muslims suddenly more important than what the first member has been saying?

Why the pussyfooting around the opinion that strict gender roles is the way to go (which also has repeatedly mentioned that women not fulfilling their roles is the reason why people murder)?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
So, we have a member who is saying women shouldn't be doing this and women shouldn't be doing that.

We have another member who is continuing to challenge that notion.

Suddenly the member who has been challenging the strict gender roles is being talked about for his gender identity, and if he is being too offensive? Why is his gender identity and if he's being too offensive to Muslims suddenly more important than what the first member has been saying?

Why the pussyfooting around the opinion that strict gender roles is the way to go (which also has repeatedly mentioned that women not fulfilling their roles is the reason why people murder)?
I'm getting lost in all this party of the first part & party of the 2nd part.
What are ya....some kind of lawyer?
 

MysticSang'ha

Big Squishy Hugger
Premium Member
I'm getting lost in all this party of the first part & party of the 2nd part.
What are ya....some kind of lawyer?

I'm wondering why Frank needs to tone down the offensiveness for a single statement when Robert's comments have repeatedly been offensive to women and trans men with nary a blink.

My previous post gave supporting details for my question here.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I'm wondering why Frank needs to tone down the offensiveness for a single statement when Robert's comments have repeatedly been offensive to women and trans men with nary a blink.
My previous post gave supporting details for my question here.
Ah, yes...we've pondered this in another thread.
Some posts are so...uh..."special", that they speak for themselves.
I decided days ago to limit my commentary, lest I only display my keen sense of the obvious.
(However, some of us have taken issue with his posts. I think that qualifies as a "blink".)
 

oldbadger

Skanky Old Mongrel!
Revolting:
if you were in a burning building and two ladders appeared outside, one with a gorgeous female op, the other with a muscular bloke, which would you choose to save you?
 

oldbadger

Skanky Old Mongrel!
do you ever stop off to buy bread, milk and stuff for your missus?

do you open doors for yourr missus?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Revolting:
if you were in a burning building and two ladders appeared outside, one with a gorgeous female op, the other with a muscular bloke, which would you choose to save you?
If the ladder is significant, whichever had the better ladder & could get it to me.a
Or is this about the ladder being there for me to climb onto?
If I don't need help getting out there, I'd pick looks easier to get to.

Hmmmm...which might engender more shame....to be rescued by a babe, or by a
guy who might come into contact with me, thereby stirring my homorepellance?
Meh....if I live thru it, I'd quickly get over either.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top