Desert Snake
Veteran Member
Huh?The claim is either true or false regardless of what you think. It is sort of odd to speak about your emotions or beliefs about an objective claim. That is sort of changing the context.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Huh?The claim is either true or false regardless of what you think. It is sort of odd to speak about your emotions or beliefs about an objective claim. That is sort of changing the context.
Huh?
I seem to recall a moment....when the Carpenter held criticism for those pressing a written word.....
now where did I see that?
The claimed error would not be in God's message to man. But, rather, the necessary step of human interpretation involved in taking that word and writing it down.Hello dear Deidre
errors mean default , is suppose God message to human had default , or not ?
this is exactly what God said in Quran !the necessary step of human interpretation involved in taking that word and writing it down.
Can you provide the verse, if you don't mind?this is exactly what God said in Quran !
editing the message God
Most Christians subscribe to a denomination/sect in which the bible is inspired, not infallible.If men were responsible for taking 'God's word' and putting it to paper, could it be that somewhere along the way, there were errors?
5-12/13Can you provide the verse, if you don't mind?
So you have no evidence, no argument. That's why I don't take your word for your comments, or find them credible.What do you mean HUH? What part of what I stated is confusing you? Did you not understand it : i.e., you did not comprehend what the English words meant or is it that you are expressing an emotional disagreement with the response "HUH"?
so....you don't lean on previous works?I was not referring to written words nor was I referring to an authority. I am not sure what you are thinking about my claims. Basically all I said was that even if you are unaware of something a claim that is literally meaningful will still have a truth value.
I do not see pressing a written word there. Your claim sounds as if you are saying I am quoting authority or something.
but if cast doubt on the Prophets.....and any written message......
what then shall we speak?....and how to be sure?
I am curious what you believe is a part of the Holy Spirit "experience". Is it just a feeling, or is there a purpose behind it? What is it suppose to do in you in terms of changing the way you relate to God and the world?What I felt happened, Rise...but I appreciate your post.
The Holy Spirit is actually referred to as the downpayment of the fullness of what God has for us, and not the end in itself. Ephesians 1:14, 2 Corinthians 1:22, 2 Corinthians 5:5Found this on another website earlier, and it resonates.
God has given us His Spirit so that we can experience intimacy with Him and enjoy all He has for us.
The Holy Spirit is the source of our deepest satisfaction.
That statement is true, however, there's a lot more to our relationship with the Holy Spirit than just knowing He is there.The Holy Spirit is God’s permanent presence with us. (John 14:16, 17)
The point is that the men who wrote it down could have added "fault".Hello dear Deidre
errors mean default , is suppose God message to human had default , or not ?
I am curious what you believe is a part of the Holy Spirit "experience". Is it just a feeling, or is there a purpose behind it? What is it suppose to do in you in terms of changing the way you relate to God and the world?
The Holy Spirit is actually referred to as the downpayment of the fullness of what God has for us, and not the end in itself. Ephesians 1:14, 2 Corinthians 1:22, 2 Corinthians 5:5
That statement is true, however, there's a lot more to our relationship with the Holy Spirit than just knowing He is there.
In the verse just before that he says, "If you love me, keep my commands".
And just a little further day he says: John 14:23-25
All throughout John 15 you see Jesus link the abiding of God, the Holy Spirit, in us with loving God. And loving God is defined as obedience to God.
I ask my original question out of concern; because we are to walk by faith and not by our natural senses. (2 Corinthians 5:7).
We can discern truth through our senses once they've been trained to do so ( Hebrews 5:14 ), It is a potentially dangerous thing to let yourself be led around by sensations alone without grounding in genuine spiritual truth which comes only from God, because God is not the only one capable of triggering emotions or feelings in your body.
That is why the Bible is important as the reliable recorded words of Jesus and his disciples. It is the standard by which we can judge truth while we are growing in our ability to discern it.
The danger of throwing out the Bible and just being led by what you feel internally is that you may find yourself not keeping the commands of Jesus, not hearing his voice and obeying his words, which puts one in danger of losing that place of abiding with him.
Some decieve themselves into believing that Jesus still abides with them because they feel certain things, even while they are in the midst of blatantly rebelling against the way God would have them live. Which is why Jesus warned: Matthew 7:21-23
God is essentially relational, and our relationship with him through the Holy Spirit is that of a relationship with a person.
It's not just a force. It's not just a feeling. It's our way of communing with God until the day we will see Jesus face to face. As with any relationship there is an exchange, and expectations, and not just a feeling we experience and leave it at that.
Our relationship with God is not directly comparable to any single earthly analogy - which is why the scripture refers to our relationship to God to that of a father, husband, king, friend, and master, in an effort to encompass the breadth and depth of who God is to us.
way too many assumptions.....If you doubt that is YOU doing it. Truth values have nothing to do with YOU. If you were never born world events would not change. Asking for evidence is a form of sense verification. That is you must use one of your famous five senses to become aware. It is funny that most religions require faith which is not sense verification. You are at odds because you would rather be practical.
Our relationship with God is not directly comparable to any single earthly analogy - which is why the scripture refers to our relationship to God to that of a father, husband, king, friend, and master, in an effort to encompass the breadth and depth of who God is to us.
lol Thank you for your concern, but I'm not 6 years old.
Love how people feel there is a cookie cutter way for all to experience faith. Whatevah you say, Rise.
Unless someone is claiming that they are ''just reading their Bible'', and not taking anything else into consideration, it's irrelevantI am not one of those Christians who believes that experiencing and actively communing with the Holy Spirit is irrelevant and that the only thing that matters is passively reading the bible.