• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

why is it so popular of Americans or atheists in America to support consensual cannibalism

Lars

Member
Calling it sick is just labelling it, it doesn't tell us why you feel that harming men and women is preferable to something which can be done with far less harm.

And I'm not saying its justified to be a cannibal, what I am saying is its a lesser evil than violence against people.

In my opinion.
Alright. Then i can make a deal. You cannibals do what you want. And church can consensually burn people at stakes who are cannibals. Sounds cool to me.

Absolutely nothing to be yucky about :) Its consent so its ok
 

danieldemol

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I never said it was good. But you did ignore feminine values of mental manipulation as nothing. So says more about people who dont care about self validated people or mental manipulation as a form of evil by mangina policies.
You have some warped female role models if you feel that mental manipulation is a "feminine value".

In my opinion.
 

Lars

Member
You have some warped female role models if you feel that mental manipulation is a "feminine value".

In my opinion.
Who said it had to be a female? Feminine values consists of mentality. Manginas exists for that reason. Masculinity simply follows the abstract of action orientated basically. Feminine is sensitivity and such things "which also can lead to suicide honestly" but there is cons and pros with both.
 

danieldemol

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Alright. Then i can make a deal. You cannibals do what you want. And church can consensually burn people at stakes who are cannibals. Sounds cool to me.

Absolutely nothing to be yucky about :) Its consent so its ok
Well first of all I'm not a cannibal, and second of all you are advocating extreme violence against a people, which is against forum rules according to my understanding.

Consider yourself reported and we'll see what the mods have to say.

In my opinion.
 

Lars

Member
Well first of all I'm not a cannibal, and second of all you are advocating extreme violence against a people, which is against forum rules according to my understanding.

Consider yourself reported and we'll see what the mods have to say.

In my opinion.

But its consent :) Its nothing wrong then is it? What if they enjoy it? You cant saaaay its evil then XD

Everything is ok with consent paah.

edit: also read Berserk manga of Farnese was masturbating to heretics burning in hell. Thats ok right? its consensual?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
And if that became normalized on world order. And some regime went to war over it. Like islamic or whatever... that would honestly make me not side with America if that were to be a reality (then again if everybody agreed then i would be so screwed). Because how can one justify such a morally sick thing to even play with?. Its so bankrupt of morality. It just gives me vibes of pagan human sacrifice worship in the past or something. Just disgusts me insanely to be honest.

But what do you think?

edit: and yes i do know the context is diseased or roadkill. It disgusts me either way
I've never heard of this before.
But we heathens have no religious prescriptions or
proscriptions regarding treatment of bodies of the dead.
So it's possible that some atheist somewhere might've
been pro consensual cannibalism. Sounds gross.
 

Lars

Member
I've never heard of this before.
But we heathens have no religious prescriptions or
proscriptions regarding treatment of bodies of the dead.
So it's possible that some atheist somewhere might've
been pro consensual cannibalism. Sounds gross.

Would it be ok if church leaders had ceremony of unknown people with consent though :p
Its not a bother of the dead.
 

Lars

Member
But one thing i do agree with.

Surah Al-Hujurat - 12

Quran 49:12
O believers! Avoid many suspicions, ˹for˺ indeed, some suspicions are sinful. And do not spy, nor backbite one another. Would any of you like to eat the flesh of their dead brother? You would despise that!1 And fear Allah. Surely Allah is ˹the˺ Accepter of Repentance, Most Merciful.
 

danieldemol

Veteran Member
Premium Member
But its consent :) Its nothing wrong then is it? What if they enjoy it? You cant saaaay its evil then XD

Everything is ok with consent paah.

edit: also read Berserk manga of Farnese was masturbating to heretics burning in hell. Thats ok right? its consensual?
I apologise i missed the word consensual as I read your post.

Following the guiding principle of doing no harm i would say it is much preferable to treat people for the altered mental states which lead to self harm than assist them to do it in the cruellest way possible.

I tried googling your berserk manga thingy and it seemed to link to fictional works, not to any real event.

In my opinion.
 

SigurdReginson

Grēne Mann
Premium Member
Cannibalism? Common now. Who is even talking about atheists and cannibalism? Are these the same people saying that Sandy hook was a hoax?
 

danieldemol

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Who said it had to be a female? Feminine values consists of mentality. Manginas exists for that reason. Masculinity simply follows the abstract of action orientated basically. Feminine is sensitivity and such things "which also can lead to suicide honestly" but there is cons and pros with both.
I'm not clear on what you are saying here, so why don't we start with some definitions to ensure the meaning of words we are using is commonly understood between us;

From Oxford languages;
feminine
/ˈfɛmɪnɪn/
Learn to pronounce

adjective
  1. 1.
    having qualities or an appearance traditionally associated with women.
    "the snowdrops gave a feminine touch to the table"













    Similar:
    womanly

    womanlike
    ladylike

    girlish

    female

    soft

    delicate

    gentle

    tender

    graceful

    refined

    modest

    girly

    feminal

  2. 2.
    GRAMMAR
    of or denoting a gender of nouns and adjectives, conventionally regarded as female.
noun
  1. 1.
    the female sex or gender.
    "the association of the arts with the feminine"

  2. 2.
    GRAMMAR
    a feminine word or form.
From dictionary.com;
Mangina is a derogatory term for any man perceived as effeminate, especially used online to put down men who identify as feminists. It can also insult the genitals of persons of all gender identities.

So as I'm reading your posts it looks as though you are associating being action orientated with normal men, and being mentally manipulative with normal women or effeminate men.

But I associate being mentally manipulative with manipulative people, who seem to come from either gender. So I don't see what it has to do with effeminate men or women, other than that like masculine men both these categories contain mentally manipulative people.

In my opinion.
 

Lars

Member
Cannibalism? Common now. Who is even talking about atheists and cannibalism? Are these the same people saying that Sandy hook was a hoax?
I have heard some atheists like Richard Dawkins and Amazing Atheist argue that its ok. But so far. Islam wins on this one. Even the Bible is vague when it comes to condemning it.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Well spanking was allowed for kids. Feminine values allows for mental manipulation "which is more or less the norm today" but Masculine values allows using force to show discomfort, hitting was probably one of them. I dont like either. Basically
How is violence a value?
 

Viker

Your beloved eccentric Auntie Cristal
And if that became normalized on world order. And some regime went to war over it. Like islamic or whatever... that would honestly make me not side with America if that were to be a reality (then again if everybody agreed then i would be so screwed). Because how can one justify such a morally sick thing to even play with?. Its so bankrupt of morality. It just gives me vibes of pagan human sacrifice worship in the past or something. Just disgusts me insanely to be honest.

But what do you think?

edit: and yes i do know the context is diseased or roadkill. It disgusts me either way
What the **** are going on about?
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
But what do you think?
I've lived in the USA all my life, and I have not heard of this. We are in a temperate climate and have not had much real starvation here for a very long time. Its rare for people to be starved here. We also have a low population per square mile. There is a lot of empty space here. We do have crowded cities, but most of the territory is empty.

Starvation historically does lead to some cannibalism anywhere in the world, regardless of where. Think about if you were a parent, and your children were starving? Your parental instincts might drive you to feed your kids. If you get hungry enough your mind begins to work differently. You may find yourself making excuses for doing things that you never would have otherwise. Now...that may not happen. You may find that your mind takes you a different route, such as suicide or some other thing; but...starvation won't make you nicer. It will make you value food more highly.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
I rather have wife beaters than cannibals. Screw that crappy morale system.
I`d even make it fairer. I would take men beaters over cannibal crap. I would honestly do everything in my power to stop these sick people. Justifying this crap is so sick
We can't help it if Republicans are eating their own. They are all about freedom to do whatever they want.
 
Top