The Neo Nerd
Well-Known Member
No i didn't ask for a list of your arguments.
I'm asking for the one piece of evidence that convinced you. The one that changed your mind from "there is no god" to "there is definitely a god".
-Q
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why is there so much opposition to evolution?
- Thread starter Agnostic75
- Start date
No i didn't ask for a list of your arguments.
I'm asking for the one piece of evidence that convinced you. The one that changed your mind from "there is no god" to "there is definitely a god".
-Q
camanintx
Well-Known Member
Has anyone ever observed Creation?
shawn001
Well-Known Member
Noaidi
slow walker
Of course. And that diseases are caused by bad air. And that there are only four elements: earth, air, fire and water. And phlogiston is real. And phrenology is an important part of medical science. And the Earth was created in 6 days.
All of these are important components of a modern science education for today's children.
Balance in the curriculum is important, you know.
camanintx
Well-Known Member
That would be "creation" with a small 'c'. I'm asking about Creation with a capital 'C', the kind that rusra02 considers proof of God.
I just gave it to you. Please reread my last post.
darkendless
Guardian of Asgaard
My opinion is that opposition is born through fear and ignorance. Fear that historical concepts may actually be nothing but philosophy.
Ignorance is the ignorance of science and the distortion of facts to suit a pre-conceived agenda (intelligent design fits this when taken extremely).
Ignorance is the ignorance of science and the distortion of facts to suit a pre-conceived agenda (intelligent design fits this when taken extremely).
camanintx
Well-Known Member
When I talk about Creation with capital 'C', I'm referring to the creation of something where nothing existed before. While the beginning of our universe is significant, there was more than likely something preceding it, even if we don't know what that was.
More on topic though, has anyone ever observed a new species springing into existence, fully formed with no possible predecessors?
Alceste
Vagabond
That's an argument, not evidence.
Heathen Hammer
Nope, you're still wrong
Before I go looking for it, when I show it to you will you admit that it's true and you're wrong?
Otherwise Im not wasting my expensive time. State your stakes in public.
I am.:faint::bow::flirt: Gotta problem wit dat?:fight:Are you in love with Ken Miller?
Tell me, with all the extensive research you have done recently on this topic, did you ever get around to reading one of Millers books?
Parent: Child, I painted the living room bright red.
Child: No. What evidence do you have that you did it?
Parent: The paint is still wet, a bucket of red paint is in the room, and I have this paintbrush in my hand.
Child: That's not evidence. That's an argument.
Breathe
Hostis humani generis
In my opinion, the argument on both sides is more like being in an apartment with no trees or bushes around.
One person says it's windy, the other one says it's not. We won't know until we go outside.
Yet this has nothing to do with evolution, which has so much evidence to back it up. To deny evolution, when there is so much evidence to support it it, then using the same metaphor, it is to watch a twister out the window and say it's not windy outside, and the cows and trees were always in the air.
My view anyway.
camanintx
Well-Known Member
So I take it no one has ever observed Creation.
outhouse
Atheistically
they did observe it!!!!!!!!!!
They observed it was a myth and outlwed it from public schools!!!!!
Sorry, you're lying through your teeth again and as always.These are not comparable at all. Children, fathers, rooms, paint, buckets, etc. exist. Plenty of empirical, objective evidence that they do. That's evidence.
There's no evidence that ghosts, imaginary rooms, imaginary buckets, imaginary red paint, etc. exist. It's just an argument when you try to convince people that these imaginary things exist.
Last edited:
McBell
Unbound
Some people honestly cannot tell the difference.
to them it is all one and the same.
I have a brother who is the same way.
He does not know the difference between opinion and fact.
Though in his mind he does and everyone who disagrees with him is wrong.
DarkSun
:eltiT
Reading this I couldn't tell if you were serious or not. So I skipped to page 16, and you were still going. I'll assume you're not trolling.
You are wrong. Also, why did you list religion as a science? Faith and the scientific method are incompatible. Religion is not science.
Wrong. Anything is possible, there are just varying levels of improbability. On a large scale, given enough time, anything can happen.
Law of large numbers - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It's called the sun. If you look up into the sky you'll see this great big ball of gas letting off heat and stuff. It provides the energy, thermodynamics is not defied.
This point has nothing to do with evolution. Evolution describes what happens AFTER replicating life already exists. Don't go off topic. If you want to talk about Abiogenesis theory, start a new thread.
There are plenty of mutations that do 'good'. Heard of drug resistance?
Drug resistance - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Religion is not science. Your point is invalid.
Go educate yourself before making such stupid remarks. There is too much evidence of fossils to cite. Just go look for it. Information is free. There is no reason to be willfully ignorant.
Last edited: