No, I think you're the one straining. I've given an example as to why Evil is not appropriate and doesn't fit, And you still reject it and if I can be honest very quickly and seemingly without thorough consideration.
I am quite aware of why the "evil" we speak of is not appropriate within your belief structure. Plain and simple, it upsets the apple cart.
Even if it is translated into the English definition of Evil (Which it is not) it wouldn't change anything for me,
I know, because for your religious beliefs to remain in harmony it simply cannot be right. No ifs, ands, or buts. It must be rejected no matter how logical it may be. I understand your situation quite well. It's very common among committed Christians, particularly the fundies. "
I caaant heeeeaaarrr youuuuuuuu."
But apparently it's desperately needed ammo for you.
I have no fight here. If you need to believe in foolishness go right ahead, just don't try selling it those who know better. You want to pitch your tent among heathens go right ahead, just don't think your message will go unchallenged.
Well you seem like the common Anti-Theist, But I don't hold it against you. I can practically taste your agenda, But I keep my comments respectful and engaging nonetheless.
Taste it, can you. Hmmmm. Just as a matter of information, what, exactly, do you see as my agenda?
That aside, I do grant that you've been fairly respectful and pretty nice about the whole thing. Nice, but wrong.
You don't have to listen to me, But I'd appreciate it if you actually did some research into the side you don't agree with. You'll probably say you have, But I don't really think so.
I haven't done much research other than to look into the claims you and others have made, and so far they haven't amounted to anything close to convincing. What most boil down to is, "
X isn't Y because it's not in accord with my beliefs."
The research that I have done seems solid, And that is why I debate the meaning.
But your research doesn't amount to anything. All you've said is that there are other interpretations you prefer. Which, while no doubt is comforting, isn't any kind of argument.
You seem to debate it because you want it to be so, Not because you believe it.
Believe me; I truly believe everything I've said. However, as an agnostic I have no stake in the correctness or incorrectness of the Bible. What I do enjoy is pointing out the flaws in religious beliefs that are paraded around as infallible or at least worthy of my consideration. I've considered Christianity over quite a few years, and find it woefully unconvincing. I just can't muster the faith to blot out its short comings.