For the sake of discussion, I am pretending god exist. If you asked me personally, every christian's answers are varied but very confusing and worth my asking about it in a curious way. RF makes it sound like we have different intents but ask us rather than assume.
Evil was not a created thing. It came into being because of the fall of Adam and Eve. God is around evil 24/7, but it does not affect Him. All are not eternally punished. God has provided a simple way of escape.
Evil does not need to exist for everyone to be happy and have freedom of choice. God "let evil" I will say then, happen or develop. It was god who gave the freedom of choice.
Why blame the children (and Adam and Eve were children at mind) because their parent put them in a dangerous environment, knowing they will be harmed, and watch them be harmed, then disown both of them because of their actions?
Does that even make sense if you're a parent even on an earthly level?
There wouldn't be a need to escape if god addressed and punished the cause right there on the spot rather than punish the victim for someone else's issues with god.
I accept God made all the law of nature, but without the fall, there would have been no adverse conditions on the earth He declared not good, but very good.
What's wrong with being all good? Do you really want evil to exist to be with god? Adam and Eve didn't think that way. They had all good and still had freedom of choice. How was their freedom of choice good (since you don't need sin to have freedom of choice) or did they have a freedom of choice or was it, as some say, a set-up?
The main symbolism for darkness is not evil, it is ignorance.
That makes sense. Christianity is an eastern faith after all.
If man has freedom of choice, don't blame what he dose on God, blame i t on man.
Nope. Man is a child. God is a parent. That doesn't mean god is bad in and of himself. But what parent would set up such a situation where people have the choice to kill themselves eternally? That's silly.
It could be a god, parent, teacher, whoever. The point is an authority set up a means for their subject to choose to do something against what the authority want them to do. It's like putting a gun in the middle of the room and expect the child not to use the gun all because he was told not to use it. Then you blame the child of using the gun as if the parent is excluded
only because he is a parent and no other reason.
God did not put His children in a dangerous environment. He put them in a very good environment. They chose to climb in with the snake and got bit.
He did put them in a dangerous environment. If not, they would not have been tempted. If satan came in to tempt them, god should have addressed that cause right then and there not later by killing people by floods and fire. He should have addressed the issue from the get-go. Also, he put the tree of knowledge of good and evil in the garden. Remember, god didn't want adam and eve to know good and evil like he did. So why put them in a garden then? That would mean god said one thing "We don't want them to know what we know" but let another thing happen "we see them touch the tree" then punish them for what they were told.
You're punishing the victim not the criminal. On earth, it's the criminal that is punished.
Being told is enough for anyone with understanding and there is no evidence they did not understand. In fact Gen 3:2-3 indicates Eve did understand.
Nope. Adam and Even had child like understanding. They didn't know anything because they haven't yet experienced it. As such, when Adam was lonely, god felt this, he sent a woman to be his company. An adult in god's presence wouldn't need someone else only god. They were innocent.
When you give a verbal command to a child, they will not understand the consequences of those actions regardless if they are told. Why? Because they would have to break that command in order to know the consequences and
reasons for the command. God gave them nor let them have any experience of evil
before the command so they had nothing to base their disobedience on.
If anything, I bet they were confused when they were kicked out of the garden. I know I would be if I had a childlike mind and my parent told me not to touch the fire, I touch it anyway, and my parent kicked me out the house. No explanation. No addressing the person who told me to touch the fire. Just me as the victim.
That' terrible.
Making us robots does not allow us to show love to man or to God. Without love man an what he does is nothing---I Cor 13:1-3
How are you robots in god's presence?
That sounds like ego talking. "I want to have
my freedom of choice even though I want god to make the choices for me."
If you really love god, you would do what he says and you would not feel like a robot because remember, god is love. As love, how can you feel worse than you do now as a sinner in need of god's grace rather than as a child dependant on god's grace?
What's wrong for being a "robot" (though I'd say child) of god?