So far, you haven't even told us where that rock is from your photo.I provided a link that supports the thread concept, you have not provided anything but opinions and twice now, accuse me of what you are doing.
I am just trying to have a discussion and am adding data.
You have not yet to dismiss a word I said, other than opinions.
I think you misunderstood me. I'm saying that if all the ice on the planet melted and was added to all the water on the planet, it wouldn't be enough to cover the whole surface of the Earth.not enough water in all the ice?
most of the ice melted which became our oceans.
Obviously there isn't enough ice now, it melted, there were several ice ages.
We have boulders all over the earth that had to be displaced by ice melting and dropping them off.
Ice is not water.Here are more links, there are two sides of a coin here and many believe the earth was completely covered in ice, at least once.
I have a degree in civil engineering that included several courses in geology and geotechnical engineering. If you want me to dig up links that say the same things that I learned in school I can, but I know what I'm talking about here.No one actually knows for sure, so who is the one trying to have a discussion with added data and who is trying to be a know it all with no supporting data?
You accuse me of not being rational, you are the one not being rational.
basically all you said was "I am right and you are wrong" with nothing to support your position.
You know, if you were here with me, I could take you outside, lead you through the tests that demonstrate that many of the soil regions in the Great Lakes region of North America have been undisturbed (e.g. by a global flood that lasts an entire year) since they were under glaciers during the last Ice Age... and it's all based on the same sound, tested science that lets us design proper building foundations.
Do you think this global flood you're suggesting was before or after the last Ice Age?