Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The difference is that one is "in his name for his pleasure" and the other is, "for the good of the offender". Unlike in your example, my G-d doesn't experience pleasure, anger, hate or any other emotion. Everything that He commands is for the good of the individual on both sides of any given episode. Someone who performs idolatry, his soul reaches a state that the only way to achieve rectification is through death. In your example, there was no benefit derived by the victim. In my theology, there is.well it depends on how you derive the knowledge to distinguish when is right and when is wrong to do it. I mean i think we all agree that i f a man enters my house, with a gun, menacing to hurt my family, i have the edge to stop him in every possible way.
but here we're talking about people that simply started to worship an idol. and those people were not even strangers, they were their brothers and sisters. Yet they killed them one by one in the name of god because god asked them to do that. that doesn't look such a solid reason.
They could have simply said "ok, you stay here with your idol and we leave" or "this is the land of our lord please go away with your idol you ungrateful pagans"
i mean you said my fictional god was, i quote your words "infantile" because he asks you to kill in his name for his pleasure, while your real god actually asked you to kill in his name for no better reason ( he was, as the bible put it, quite pissed off. And again, it was brothers and sisters that struggles with them for years wandering trough the desert, those man were killing, . I'm sorry to keep hitting the same button, it wasn't even intended when i started the conversation to come up with this episode, but since we stumbled on it i really can't figure out the difference.
Did i have to add the word "infidels" when i said my god requested to kill people, to make it moral or just?
The difference is that one is "in his name for his pleasure" and the other is, "for the good of the offender". Unlike in your example, my G-d doesn't experience pleasure, anger, hate or any other emotion. Everything that He commands is for the good of the individual on both sides of any given episode. Someone who performs idolatry, his soul reaches a state that the only way to achieve rectification is through death. In your example, there was no benefit derived by the victim. In my theology, there is.
Like I said, through Jewish literature, phrases like these take on a different meaning.your god doesn't experience anger? quite a bold assumption considering part of the myths involve things like the flood, sodom and gomorrah. Not to mention that in the very part of the text i linked it says "god was furious and Moses had to talk him down"
No, its not out job to determine who is deserving to die, outside the framework we were given. As you noticed, the Israelites required a special commandment to kill them. We are not meant to be executioners, we are meant to be rectifiers. And we can only rectify what we are permitted to rectify. Otherwise we are destroying. Since we are not permitted to go around killing idol worshipers, from our perspective to do so would be causing destruction. From the perspective of the idol worshiper, he will require some other means of rectification.So are you assuming is fair for you to kill me? I mean i definitely perform idolatry. Would you kill me?
No. Why ask for trouble?would you worship an evil god if you were 100% sure of his existence?
suppose you're 100% sure there's a god, an allmighty god, that created the universe and all the rest, and this god asks you to kill, rape, torture and plunder in his name.
if you worship him he will send you in heaven where all sort of good things happens to you.
if you refuse to worship him he will send you in hell where eternal pain and torture awaits you.
would you worship him?
Hi Cambridge,suppose you're 100% sure there's a god, an allmighty god, that created the universe and all the rest, and this god asks you to kill, rape, torture and plunder in his name.
This sounds similar with the statement of the devil who tempted Jesus.if you worship him he will send you in heaven where all sort of good things happens to you.
if you refuse to worship him he will send you in hell where eternal pain and torture awaits you.
suppose you're 100% sure there's a god, an allmighty god, that created the universe and all the rest, and this god asks you to kill, rape, torture and plunder in his name.
if you worship him he will send you in heaven where all sort of good things happens to you.
if you refuse to worship him he will send you in hell where eternal pain and torture awaits you.
would you worship him?