-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You say that there is a god...
- Thread starter ppp
- Start date
I don't think you are being honest here. Atheists will only accept some sort of god exists when the claimant (believer) presents adequate and valid evidence that it exists. Note that the god gas to be well defined so that evidence can be followed to a sound conclusion that the defined claims is true, or at least likely true. Thus far in history no belieiver has been able to do this.
ppp
Well-Known Member
Oh course you did. Have a cookie.
ppp
Well-Known Member
Aren't the ones that don't rely on naturalism called pseudo-science?
Dummy. I’m not even like a normal Christian. I’m an Angel, I was a Hindu Shaivite my whole life. You should check out my Wife’s Threads account:
Kali Van Kush Soap and more (@kalivankush) on Threads
I am working to help grow the Van Kush Family Currency. I create Content and Hemp Products #CBD #Hemp #Delta8 #Silver #Spot DFW, TX #VanKushFamily. 0 Followers.
www.threads.net
We are the Van Kush Family.
Last edited:
ppp
Well-Known Member
That is a pretty offensive term. You should rethink your empathy.
As that had nothingto do with my response to you, I don't care.
ppp
Well-Known Member
That isnt what hypocrisy means. Your response should have been, You are wrong. That wasn't a rant.
Dangling participle. I am not going to try to guess what that is supposed to mean.
Ok.I know. You posted about it.
lukethethird
unknown member
Nobody cares about the calendar.
Sgt. Pepper
All you need is love.
^ This.
ppp
Well-Known Member
Or you could just tone down on the posturing and provide the object of the sentence.
dybmh
דניאל יוסף בן מאיר הירש
I do recall something you said to me once which was: {paraphrasing} "Go back and read what I said, if you can't figure it out, then, we're done."
So... what would you call it, when a person makes demands on another person, that they themselves don't
Isn't that a hypocrite?
dybmh
דניאל יוסף בן מאיר הירש
umm, I just went back and re-read... you're not being honest.
I said: "The hypocrisy is, you made a dig at me, it wasn't a rant. I replied in kind, and it was."
You replied: "That isnt what hypocrisy means. Your response should have been, You are wrong. That wasn't a rant."
That means you did read it and understood what it meant.
Then in the same post:
I said: "I replied in kind, and it was."
You said: "Dangling participle. I am not going to try to guess what that is supposed to mean."
Wait a minute. You just contradicted yourself. You clearly understood what I meant. But chose to make a school-teacher petty correction, and claimed you would not try to guess what it meant. But you did, very easily guess correctly. You naturally understood what I said.
In fact, you double dipped on the correction. Correcting once because you understood. Then you double dipped, pretending you couldn't understand, so you could correct me again.
See, this is what I mean.
You don't want to have thoughtful serious discussions. You want to pick nits. At least with me you don't want serious discussions, and it seems to be the case with anyone who is a theist. You're acting like a lover scorned. Theism betrayed you? God turned its back on you? Based on your very negative reaction when we first met, it seems like "religion" is your Satan. Am I even close?
Last edited: