• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Your best argument that G-d does not exist

McBell

McBell

Admiral Obvious
paarsurrey said:
Your best argument that "G-d does not exist"

They don't have a single argument even, not to speak of the best among many. Right? Please
Regards
Click to expand...
Your ability to ignore what you do not want to see is most impressive.
Doesn't help your credibility one bit, but is most impressive none the less.

The fact is there is no need for an "argument" against god.
There is a serious lack of credible evidence for god.

Lack of evidence does not mean god does not exist.
It just means that there is no need for an argument against god existing.


BTW
What colour does the number seven smell like?
 
paarsurrey

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Mestemia said:
Your ability to ignore what you do not want to see is most impressive.
Doesn't help your credibility one bit, but is most impressive none the less.
The fact is there is no need for an "argument" against god.
There is a serious lack of credible evidence for god.
Lack of evidence does not mean god does not exist.
It just means that there is no need for an argument against god existing.
BTW
What colour does the number seven smell like?
Click to expand...

Becajse once one has sown the seed of doubt in one's heart and mind to start with, so it will grow. One never started with certainty in disbelief, so one is completely wrong. Please
Regards
 
Kartari

Kartari

Active Member
Hi paarsurrey,

paarsurrey said:
Your best argument that "G-d does not exist"

They don't have a single argument even, not to speak of the best among many. Right? Please
Regards
Click to expand...

As a number of us have already posted, the primary argument against God's existence is the complete lack of evidence for God's existence. As far as we can factually discern, various depictions of God only exist in collections of old fables and in the human imagination, but not in actual reality. While this is apparently not a deterrent for many to believe in their personally most appealing version of God anyway, this fundamental argument nonetheless stands unchallenged.

I can think of other arguments for atheism as well, but this is the most decisive one.

If you, or anyone else, can provide evidence, by all means please do so! :)
 
C

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
paarsurrey said:
Becajse once one has sown the seed of doubt in one's heart and mind to start with, so it will grow. One never started with certainty in disbelief, so one is completely wrong. Please
Regards
Click to expand...
No.
Once one has separated their ethics and world view from evidence and reason they might believe or justify almost anything.
Tom
 
J

jbkoleen23

New Member
"All the gods, all the heavens,all the hells are within you." ~~Joseph Campbell

Man wrote the bible, and created Christianity. Just like the men before created other religions. If in the 4.53 billion years of earth's existence, no proof of a God has been found, then either he does not exist or he does not want to be sought after. It's all made up. People who follow religions are the only things keeping their gods alive.
 
paarsurrey

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
jbkoleen23 said:
"All the gods, all the heavens,all the hells are within you." ~~Joseph Campbell
Man wrote the bible, and created Christianity. Just like the men before created other religions. If in the 4.53 billion years of earth's existence, no proof of a God has been found, then either he does not exist or he does not want to be sought after. It's all made up. People who follow religions are the only things keeping their gods alive.
Click to expand...

What was the source of Joseph Campbell for claiming that what you have quoted above from him. Nothing but a conjecture. Right? Please

Regards
 
McBell

McBell

Admiral Obvious
paarsurrey said:
Becajse once one has sown the seed of doubt in one's heart and mind to start with, so it will grow. One never started with certainty in disbelief, so one is completely wrong. Please
Regards
Click to expand...
Ah, so you are saying that all the truth, facts, etc. that you ignore is to protect your faith?
 
Kartari

Kartari

Active Member
Hi paarsurrey,

paarsurrey said:
What was the source of Joseph Campbell for claiming that what you have quoted above from him. Nothing but a conjecture. Right? Please

Regards
Click to expand...

Since no evidence has been shown to support the existence of God, it therefore appears that God is nothing but conjecture.

And therein lies the chief argument against God's existence, as previously stated.
 
T

The Old One

New Member
Kartari said:
Since no evidence has been shown to support the existence of God, it therefore appears that God is nothing but conjecture.

And therein lies the chief argument against God's existence, as previously stated.
Click to expand...

One needs to simply transcend death to know there is no "God", just a bunch of confused spirits


Mestemia said:
BTW
What colour does the number seven smell like?
Click to expand...

The colour of seven smells like Orange (but I prefer six as the colour of its smell is grape)
 
interminable

interminable

منتظر
viole said:
Well then, how do you differentiate between a cause and its effect? How do you know which is which?

Suppose I tell you: no no, what you call effect is the cause and what you call cause is its effect. How would you prove me wrong?

Ciao

- viole
Click to expand...
The existence of cause should be befor the effect and I don't know what u r seeking for
Would u please make an example that we can't differentiate between a cause and it's effect

We know that fire is a cause of heat
Can u say that heat is a cause and fire is its effect?
 
9-10ths_Penguin

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
interminable said:
What I meant is the heat that can burn your skin and if your skin is wet can't burn your skin
Click to expand...
If your skin is wet, you can still get scalded.

Besides For making a fire a small spark is enough
Click to expand...
Yes: a small source of heat to start the process, then the fire gets the rest of the heat it needs from the fuel. You still need heat.
 
interminable

interminable

منتظر
9-10ths_Penguin said:
If your skin is wet, you can still get scalded.


Yes: a small source of heat to start the process, then the fire gets the rest of the heat it needs from the fuel. You still need heat.
Click to expand...
Heat isn't in a fuel after combination of those three we can use heat to warm

This is clear, no need to any further arguments except for someone that denies everything
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top