Your best argument that G-d does not exist

[McBell]

Your best argument that "G-d does not exist"

They don't have a single argument even, not to speak of the best among many. Right? Please
Regards

Your ability to ignore what you do not want to see is most impressive.
Doesn't help your credibility one bit, but is most impressive none the less.

The fact is there is no need for an "argument" against god.
There is a serious lack of credible evidence for god.

Lack of evidence does not mean god does not exist.
It just means that there is no need for an argument against god existing.


BTW
What colour does the number seven smell like?

 

[paarsurrey]

Your ability to ignore what you do not want to see is most impressive.
Doesn't help your credibility one bit, but is most impressive none the less.
The fact is there is no need for an "argument" against god.
There is a serious lack of credible evidence for god.
Lack of evidence does not mean god does not exist.
It just means that there is no need for an argument against god existing.
BTW
What colour does the number seven smell like?

Becajse once one has sown the seed of doubt in one's heart and mind to start with, so it will grow. One never started with certainty in disbelief, so one is completely wrong. Please
Regards

 

[Rick O'Shez]

BTW
What colour does the number seven smell like?

Roses.

 

[Kartari]

Hi paarsurrey,

Your best argument that "G-d does not exist"

They don't have a single argument even, not to speak of the best among many. Right? Please
Regards

As a number of us have already posted, the primary argument against God's existence is the complete lack of evidence for God's existence. As far as we can factually discern, various depictions of God only exist in collections of old fables and in the human imagination, but not in actual reality. While this is apparently not a deterrent for many to believe in their personally most appealing version of God anyway, this fundamental argument nonetheless stands unchallenged.

I can think of other arguments for atheism as well, but this is the most decisive one.

If you, or anyone else, can provide evidence, by all means please do so!

 

[columbus]

Becajse once one has sown the seed of doubt in one's heart and mind to start with, so it will grow. One never started with certainty in disbelief, so one is completely wrong. Please
Regards

No.
Once one has separated their ethics and world view from evidence and reason they might believe or justify almost anything.
Tom

 

[jbkoleen23]

"All the gods, all the heavens,all the hells are within you." ~~Joseph Campbell

Man wrote the bible, and created Christianity. Just like the men before created other religions. If in the 4.53 billion years of earth's existence, no proof of a God has been found, then either he does not exist or he does not want to be sought after. It's all made up. People who follow religions are the only things keeping their gods alive.

 

[paarsurrey]

"All the gods, all the heavens,all the hells are within you." ~~Joseph Campbell
Man wrote the bible, and created Christianity. Just like the men before created other religions. If in the 4.53 billion years of earth's existence, no proof of a God has been found, then either he does not exist or he does not want to be sought after. It's all made up. People who follow religions are the only things keeping their gods alive.

What was the source of Joseph Campbell for claiming that what you have quoted above from him. Nothing but a conjecture. Right? Please

Regards

 

[LuisDantas]

What was the source of Joseph Campbell for claiming that what you have quoted above from him. Nothing but a conjecture. Right? Please

Regards

You talk like that is a bad thing.

 

[McBell]

Becajse once one has sown the seed of doubt in one's heart and mind to start with, so it will grow. One never started with certainty in disbelief, so one is completely wrong. Please
Regards

Ah, so you are saying that all the truth, facts, etc. that you ignore is to protect your faith?

 

[Rick O'Shez]

HE JUST DOESN'T, OK!

 

[Kartari]

Hi paarsurrey,

What was the source of Joseph Campbell for claiming that what you have quoted above from him. Nothing but a conjecture. Right? Please

Regards

Since no evidence has been shown to support the existence of God, it therefore appears that God is nothing but conjecture.

And therein lies the chief argument against God's existence, as previously stated.

 

[Unveiled Artist]

HE JUST DOESN'T, OK!

Shhtt. I can hear you all the way in the next room.

 

[The Old One]

Since no evidence has been shown to support the existence of God, it therefore appears that God is nothing but conjecture.

And therein lies the chief argument against God's existence, as previously stated.

One needs to simply transcend death to know there is no "God", just a bunch of confused spirits

BTW
What colour does the number seven smell like?

The colour of seven smells like Orange (but I prefer six as the colour of its smell is grape)

 

[interminable]

Well then, how do you differentiate between a cause and its effect? How do you know which is which?

Suppose I tell you: no no, what you call effect is the cause and what you call cause is its effect. How would you prove me wrong?

Ciao

- viole

The existence of cause should be befor the effect and I don't know what u r seeking for
Would u please make an example that we can't differentiate between a cause and it's effect

We know that fire is a cause of heat
Can u say that heat is a cause and fire is its effect?

 

[psychoslice]

There is no argument if god exist or not, and that is simply what is, everything else is just made up rubbish.

 

[9-10ths_Penguin]

We know that fire is a cause of heat
Can u say that heat is a cause and fire is its effect?

You aren't familiar with the fire triangle, are you?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_triangle

Yes: heat is a cause of fire. No heat, no fire.

 

[Willamena]

You aren't familiar with the fire triangle, are you?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_triangle

Yes: heat is a cause of fire. No heat, no fire.

It"s not a cause, just a condition. On the other hand, fire releases heat.

 

[interminable]

You aren't familiar with the fire triangle, are you?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_triangle

Yes: heat is a cause of fire. No heat, no fire.

What I meant is the heat that can burn your skin and if your skin is wet can't burn your skin


Besides For making a fire a small spark is enough

 

[9-10ths_Penguin]

What I meant is the heat that can burn your skin and if your skin is wet can't burn your skin

If your skin is wet, you can still get scalded.

Besides For making a fire a small spark is enough

Yes: a small source of heat to start the process, then the fire gets the rest of the heat it needs from the fuel. You still need heat.

 

[interminable]

If your skin is wet, you can still get scalded.


Yes: a small source of heat to start the process, then the fire gets the rest of the heat it needs from the fuel. You still need heat.

Heat isn't in a fuel after combination of those three we can use heat to warm

This is clear, no need to any further arguments except for someone that denies everything