Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I have seen Christ also, it doesn't mean he's real.
Did you not hear me talk about the almighty sun God Ra, I'm a Zen Buddhist and a Pagan.
If you think your God is simpler than rocket science then that's a pretty small god. I can totally interpret this question as 'if God is incomprehensibly large, knowledgable, without human logic, and beyond anything we can measure, than it's safe to say that your limited view of god, which you have in your head, is about as much the true God as a tiny root branch underground a giant sequoia tree.' In that respect, one would be deluding themselves to believe that they know, understand, or can speak for God.Your God...
is your God.
Your God is God.
It's not rocket science.
That is 'your' problem. I don't have that problem.
God can be real in someone's mind. It translates to real actions in respect to that view and/or belief, so a person's God is as real as he or she makes it out to be.
Not necessarily. Rocket science is pretty convoluted. God needn't be convoluted.If you think your God is simpler than rocket science then that's a pretty small god.
Or, that the root of a sequoia tree can be pretty convoluted.I can totally interpret this question as 'if God is incomprehensibly large, knowledgable, without human logic, and beyond anything we can measure, than it's safe to say that your limited view of god, which you have in your head, is about as much the true God as a tiny root branch underground a giant sequoia tree.' In that respect, one would be deluding themselves to believe that they know, understand, or can speak for God.
I am unable to agree but as it applies to me, not others, not you.Do you agree or disagree with this statement: "Your god is not god. Your god (or gods) is, at best, an approach to thinking about god (or to thinking about the gods)." If you agree with the statement, why do you agree? If you do not agree, why not?
God is something beyond our comprehension. Our holy books are just an abstract layer, with its faults. It's like explaining gravity by Newtonian laws (i.e. they are wrong, but a good approximation).Do you agree or disagree with this statement: "Your god is not god. Your god (or gods) is, at best, an approach to thinking about god (or to thinking about the gods)." If you agree with the statement, why do you agree? If you do not agree, why not?
Well he isn't real in the sense that he is a man, he represents our true nature, call that the Buddha, the Christ, Krishna, or whatever name you want to use. Our mind body organism is nothing but a programmed and conditioned organism, but our true Self is beyond this organism, we are One with the Cosmos or what you might call God. So what I have experienced in seeing Jesus was just that, experiencing my true Self, the image of Jesus only represent that which is, this is my truth.If it is true that you have seen Christ, then I don't understand you stating,"It doesn't mean he's real." It makes no sense to me.
Sorry to sound like I'm sitting on the fence but I agree and disagree. We all have an inclination to believe in something as we are born like this. So it is in our nature as the bible says to look for God. Because of this people will make gods out of many different things when looking for the one true God and say that they have found the truth. But if there is a God and God represents the truth then there can only be one God because there cannot be many truths.
Isaiah44:6 — Thus saith the LORD the King of Israel, and his redeemer the LORD of hosts; I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement: "Your god is not god. Your god (or gods) is, at best, an approach to thinking about god (or to thinking about the gods)." If you agree with the statement, why do you agree? If you do not agree, why not?