• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Your Political Status

Exaltist Ethan

Bridging the Gap Between Believers and Skeptics
One of my favorite things about this website is that it gives you direct access to label your religion directly. A few months ago I purposed an idea which the same thing could be done but for political status too, to the admins and moderators of this website. It was shot down because this is Religious Forums, not Religious and Political Forums, even though there are some users who frequent the political forums more often than the religious ones.

The purpose of this thread isn't to complain that I didn't get my way. There is that empty space under religion status that I thought could be used for this, but it's fine that it isn't. I still value this website greatly, and there are other ways to declare your political status other than an official status marker of such as part of your profile. One of them was to vote for and participate in a this thread I made several months ago. There's also this thread, which is also bookmarked.

But let's just say that my idea went through and you were allowed to have a politics status as part of your overall profile. What would you have typed in your political status, if anything?

To clear the area as to my political positions I would probably have "Centrist" or "Federalist" in my status. I side with the Republican Party more often than not, but if the Reform Party were more viable I'd probably lend my vote to that instead of the Republicans. I refused to vote for Trump for President so I voted for the Libertarians instead for President, Jo Jorgenson and before that Gary Johnson.

(By the way, I am not trying to violate rule two, the topic of this discussion is to discuss different political statuses, not the argue over the moderation or decisions of the staff here on this forum. I am fine that my idea was shot down. I just want to use this space as a way of communicating the same idea, in thread format rather than profile format.)
 

Rival

Diex Aie
Staff member
Premium Member
Monarchist.

Feudalist.

Christendom.

The Pope??



In seriousness I'd put Disraelite or Victorian Liberal.
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
I typically answer "liberal" but really a liberal (European social democrat) who believes we should do what works (technocrat) and wants to get government spending under control (fair progressive taxation that would make the rich pay their fair share).
 

Eddi

Christianity, Taoism, and Humanism
Premium Member
I wouldn't enter anything

I don't mind the religious label I have chosen for myself because I have strong and detailed religious beliefs

I would not give myself a political label as I don't have strong and detailed political beliefs
 

JustGeorge

Imperfect
Staff member
Premium Member
Like @Eddi , I would leave it blank.

I feel about politics as I feel about poop. I acknowledge its necessary and serves a function, but I find it gross and smelly, and certainly don't want it on my hands.
 

The Sum of Awe

Brought to you by the moment that spacetime began.
Staff member
Premium Member
I would put “Who cares? Everyone in charge has their own agenda”
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
I'd need several lines to label myself. Including socialist, social democrat, liberal, labour (not particularly new labour), green, slightly conservative, renaissance, ecology

Generally leaning left with a hint of centre following British, French and European parties.

Is it any wonder I'm confused?
 

exchemist

Veteran Member
One of my favorite things about this website is that it gives you direct access to label your religion directly. A few months ago I purposed an idea which the same thing could be done but for political status too, to the admins and moderators of this website. It was shot down because this is Religious Forums, not Religious and Political Forums, even though there are some users who frequent the political forums more often than the religious ones.

The purpose of this thread isn't to complain that I didn't get my way. There is that empty space under religion status that I thought could be used for this, but it's fine that it isn't. I still value this website greatly, and there are other ways to declare your political status other than an official status marker of such as part of your profile. One of them was to vote for and participate in a this thread I made several months ago. There's also this thread, which is also bookmarked.

But let's just say that my idea went through and you were allowed to have a politics status as part of your overall profile. What would you have typed in your political status, if anything?

To clear the area as to my political positions I would probably have "Centrist" or "Federalist" in my status. I side with the Republican Party more often than not, but if the Reform Party were more viable I'd probably lend my vote to that instead of the Republicans. I refused to vote for Trump for President so I voted for the Libertarians instead for President, Jo Jorgenson and before that Gary Johnson.

(By the way, I am not trying to violate rule two, the topic of this discussion is to discuss different political statuses, not the argue over the moderation or decisions of the staff here on this forum. I am fine that my idea was shot down. I just want to use this space as a way of communicating the same idea, in thread format rather than profile format.)
The trouble I see in your idea is that there are no universal terms for political positions. Someone on the left of US politics is centre-right in Europe, while someone on the right in the US looks like Genghis Khan in Europe. "Liberal" means quite different things in the US, UK and Australia. And so on.

Furthermore, people like me resist being pigeonholed politically. We like to think we do not have packaged opinions. So we would not want to label ourselves and thereby invite a load of assumptions about what we think on a given subject.

A further complication is that the centres of the various political spectra, on which you might position yourself, shift with time. I used to think of myself, in the UK, as being, at least on many issues, broadly a One Nation Conservative. However politics here has shifted such that I now find myself regarded by many people as left of centre. (The same has happened to the Financial Times newspaper that I read.)

So I can see a lot of snags with the idea.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I'd need several lines to label myself. Including socialist, social democrat, liberal, labour (not particularly new labour), green, slightly conservative, renaissance, ecology

Generally leaning left with a hint of centre following British, French and European parties.

Is it any wonder I'm confused?
And I thought it was because you were a disembodied skull. :rolleyes:
 

Exaltist Ethan

Bridging the Gap Between Believers and Skeptics
So I can see a lot of snags with the idea.

Oh, I completely understand that. While it's not a perfect idea other websites have the same type of barometers to subjectify people's opinions. My parents are staunched Republicans and are also atheist and pro-choice. However, if you can give weight to both their political and religious affiliation it could help people understand where you're coming from. And if someone says they are on the left but we know they come from the United States, that can be weighted too.

The only solution I'd figure that would work is if there was a part of your visible profile where you post there could be a little icon somewhere of your national origin. But having two radical changes to RF like that, both with a "Politics" section and a national origin part probably would never happen. Plus, ultimately I feel like many people wouldn't use either and leave both blank anyways. This website attracts more people who are spiritual and/or religious rather than the political.

@Exaltist Ethan

You may find this thread from 2020 interesting.

RF-Wide Political Compass

I'm going to have to re-take the political compass quiz and post my results there!
 

Jimmy

King Phenomenon
Democrat.
Whatever happened to either democrat or republican? Now we got all these weird labels. Haha.

Well I'm in the pink party with a touch of neo Geo and a dash of progressive Scooby doo
 

The Hammer

Skald
Premium Member
One of my favorite things about this website is that it gives you direct access to label your religion directly. A few months ago I purposed an idea which the same thing could be done but for political status too, to the admins and moderators of this website. It was shot down because this is Religious Forums, not Religious and Political Forums, even though there are some users who frequent the political forums more often than the religious ones.

The purpose of this thread isn't to complain that I didn't get my way. There is that empty space under religion status that I thought could be used for this, but it's fine that it isn't. I still value this website greatly, and there are other ways to declare your political status other than an official status marker of such as part of your profile. One of them was to vote for and participate in a this thread I made several months ago. There's also this thread, which is also bookmarked.

But let's just say that my idea went through and you were allowed to have a politics status as part of your overall profile. What would you have typed in your political status, if anything?

To clear the area as to my political positions I would probably have "Centrist" or "Federalist" in my status. I side with the Republican Party more often than not, but if the Reform Party were more viable I'd probably lend my vote to that instead of the Republicans. I refused to vote for Trump for President so I voted for the Libertarians instead for President, Jo Jorgenson and before that Gary Johnson.

(By the way, I am not trying to violate rule two, the topic of this discussion is to discuss different political statuses, not the argue over the moderation or decisions of the staff here on this forum. I am fine that my idea was shot down. I just want to use this space as a way of communicating the same idea, in thread format rather than profile format.)

Hmmmm...


Socialist
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
I'd have as much trouble with it as I do with religion....lol.
But probably radical centrist if I'm just answering with a simple tag.
 

exchemist

Veteran Member
Oh, I completely understand that. While it's not a perfect idea other websites have the same type of barometers to subjectify people's opinions. My parents are staunched Republicans and are also atheist and pro-choice. However, if you can give weight to both their political and religious affiliation it could help people understand where you're coming from. And if someone says they are on the left but we know they come from the United States, that can be weighted too.

The only solution I'd figure that would work is if there was a part of your visible profile where you post there could be a little icon somewhere of your national origin. But having two radical changes to RF like that, both with a "Politics" section and a national origin part probably would never happen. Plus, ultimately I feel like many people wouldn't use either and leave both blank anyways. This website attracts more people who are spiritual and/or religious rather than the political.



I'm going to have to re-take the political compass quiz and post my results there!
Yeah, I find that political compass test particularly irritating and superficial, trying as it does to reduce political views to a two-dimensional Boston Grid. :rolleyes:
 
Yeah, I find that political compass test particularly irritating and superficial, trying as it does to reduce political views to a two-dimensional Boston Grid. :rolleyes:

I hate things like that and just find myself getting increasingly annoyed at the trite, poorly worded questions because the answer is usually "it depends...".

Even worse are the ones designed to lead you somewhere and the "wrong" choices are so ridiculous.

This "How humanist are you quiz" is particularly vapid :D

upload_2023-2-22_10-18-19.png


How humanist are you?
 
Top