Where are you getting your quotes from the angels. They are not found in Scripture. I don't see any evidence presented here for Scripture being contradictory. Bring forth the evidence. Why should we accept your words as more correct than the next guy. Where's the beef?
Jesus lived a sinless life and died on the cross to pay for our sins. All you have to do is trust in Him. Trust in Him and you will be in Heaven after you die.
Take it in context. Peter is writing to Christians who have been scattered abroad due to persecution.
1Pe 1:13 Wherefore gird up the loins of your mind, be sober, and hope to the end for the grace that is to be brought unto you at the revelation of Jesus Christ;
14 As obedient children, not...
You are misinterpreting Scripture. Nowhere in Scripture does it differentiate a state of sin with the act of sin. When the Bible says that Jesus was made sin, it means that our sins were placed upon him. He lived a sinless life, but died to pay the penalty for sins. While on the cross, our sins...
Scripture interprets Scripture. When one portion of the Bible is called false, all other parts of the Bible that are built on that part or that refer to that part must then also be false.
It is your opinion that there are bits and pieces missing. I believe that the canon of Scripture is...
If you question one portion of Scripture, what is to stop you from questioning the other parts? The Bible has to be taken as wholly true or wholly false. It comes down to faith.
Just what exactly do you believe as far as the origin of the earth? Do you believe theistic evolution, the day age theory or the Gap theory? Or is it something else?
I don't know more than they did, but they were not perfect. You don't have to know more to find mistakes. There are many places where the chapter and verse divisions are in a bad place. I am not the only one who says this. There are many very educated and studied people who do.
Perhaps you are unaware that in it's original form, the Bible had no chapters. This is simply a bad chapter break placed by men later, not by the authors.
Exactly as you said: He did so in an organized matter. Evolution is not at all an organized matter. Also, I do not believe the Bible to be a science book, but when it discusses scientific matter it is 100% correct. Scientists have changes their minds so many times. No matter how overwhelming the...
I think that it is a subtle hint, nonetheless. yes it refers to humans, but it makes a distinction between flesh and blood and the Father. Like I said, it was just something I cam across while reading. I can't say for sure until I look into more.
Yes, there are some symbolic things. You have to take several things into account though before concluding that it is metaphorical. For instance, the style of writing (poetry, prose).
Actually, if you don't take genesis literally, it causes the whole Bible to be in error. God inspired the words, not just the ideas. The only way the different men affect the Scriptures is their style's of writing.