• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. U

    Question on the death of Jesus

    Yes, trying to teach a bird calculus is idiotic. However, extreme examples help to illustrate points. This point being that we ought not be shocked to learn that there are spiritual/heavenly/Godly things we simply are not equipped to comprehend. Somewhere in the bible, that fact is written. I...
  2. U

    Pagan Vs Non-Pagan

    I believe it is less about the actual word and more about what the intent of the speaker is behind the word. Whether you call me "buddy," "dude," or whatever, if I understand you are talking to me, then the name you use applies to me. It is said that we really don't know the real name of...
  3. U

    Question on the death of Jesus

    If you try to teach a bird calculus, you'd likely be wasting your time. I recall the bible speaks to there being (obviously??) things relating to God etc. that we simply can't understand. Even so, suppose we cloned your DNA and a baby was born via surrogate with your exact DNA. Could the...
  4. U

    Spiritual vs Physical

    I tend to think of the spiritual as being an additional dimension(s). A dimension with different and/or additional "physics." Entities in this dimension may possess the ability to manifest into "our" "physical" realm in varying degrees, according to the particular entity's...
  5. U

    The nephilim (your take)

    Fallen angels. I believe so. If I follow you, you are suggesting that because angels and humans produced a human hybrid, that this hybrid was not created by God? Then my response is just as God is credited with the creation of humans by Christians etc. even though humans themselves can...
  6. U

    The nephilim (your take)

    I believe fallen angels had the ability to manifest into some sort of body and impregnate earthly (of course) females and thereby causing, due to the non-human DNA of the angelic "bodies," unique offspring; one uniqueness being their giant adult stature.
  7. U

    Why are people mean?

    Many have responded that people are mean due to some personal flaws, etc. they suffer from. While this may be true some of the time, I find that many mean people are actually "successful, well educated, etc." and have no more flaws than everyone else...even fewer actually. I believe it to be...
  8. U

    What - a fallible and angry god?

    Thanks for pointing that out to me. My apologies to you and the moderators.
  9. U

    Christians, please answer this thread...

    The following are my answers as to why Christians in general believe such and such and are not necessarily what I myself believe. I suppose because if you believe you have the true religion, there is no need to open your mind to others. I find this with most (all?) religions. Most...
  10. U

    What - a fallible and angry god?

    You [say you] have no control over the robot either, yet you acknowledge that it still remains your creation. Additionally, just as you designed it to walk from point A to point B, you also designed it to pooh. The robot didn't redesign itself in order to pooh. My original point was more...
  11. U

    What - a fallible and angry god?

    You're welcome! I've thought about this. Suppose I create a computer virus that replicates without "mating" with another virus. I would consider the original virus my creation, as well as it's offspring. (So would the FBI.) Suppose I create two robots, calling them Adam and Eve. I...
  12. U

    What - a fallible and angry god?

    Angels. The Nephilim were the offspring of angels and humans. No. No. He gave his creation freewill. He could have created perfect, non-freewill, robots. If the creations act in grossly disobedient fashion, total destruction of the creation seems a fair option. If I...
  13. U

    Where are those that have already died?

    Since I can't post links per this site's rules (I am new here and have made fewer than ~15 posts) I quote the following "Tomorrow's World" article. I am not affiliated with them other than I believe their teachings (the whole article is 16k characters; I had to cut it to fit within the 10k...
Top